PLR 200422060: Municipal pension contributions excluded from current income and withholding
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A municipality planned to pay mandatory employee contributions to a pension plan for certain police officers by reducing their current salary. Its resolution made the contributions mandatory and gave employees no cash option. The IRS ruled that the amounts picked up by the employer would be treated as employer contributions under section 414(h)(2), so they would not enter employees' gross income when contributed. They also would be excluded from wages for federal income tax withholding under section 3401(a)(12)(A). The arrangement could take effect no earlier than the later of the dates the final resolution was signed or put into effect. The IRS gave no opinion on Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Are the municipality's mandatory pension contributions excluded from current employee income and federal withholding wages?
- Outcome: Approved on the stated facts and plan qualification assumption.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 414(h)(2), 3401(a)(12)(A); Rev. Rul. 81-35 and 81-36.
Full text (IRS public release)
200422060
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
MAR - 5 2004
Uniform Issue List 414.07-00
Attn: Pension Administrator
Legend:
Employer A =
State B =
Plan X =
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
This is in response to a ruling request dated January 20, 2003 from your authorized representative, concerning the pick up of certain employee contributions to Plan X under section 414(h)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).
The following facts and representations have been submitted:
Employer A, a municipality of State B within the meaning of Code section 414(d), sponsors Plan X for the benefit of certain of its police officer employees. Plan X meets the qualification requirements of Code section 401(a).
State B enacted legislation, which enabled Employer A to establish and maintain Plan X. Under State B’s Pension Code, Employer A is required to withhold a
2 200422060
certain percentage of each employee’s salary who participates in Plan X and pay the amount withheld directly to Plan X. State B’s Pension Code allows Employer A to reduce the current salary of Plan X participants and pay the mandatory employee contribution directly to Plan X in lieu of contributions by the individual participants.
Employer A’s board of directors passed a resolution dated to be effective upon the issuance of a favorable ruling by the Internal Revenue Service. The resolution provides, in part, that : Employer A shall pick up the mandatory contribution to Plan X; Employer A shall reduce eligible employees' current salary by the amount picked up by Employer A; Employer A shall cease to withhold Federal and State income taxes on the picked up contributions; and eligible employees of Plan X shall not be given the option to receive cash directly in lieu of contributions.
Based on the foregoing facts and representations, you have requested the following rulings:
-
That the mandatory employee contributions “picked up” by
Employer A shall be excluded from the gross income of eligible participants until distributed or otherwise made available; and -
That the “picked up contributions paid by Employer A are not
wages for Federal income tax withholding purposes and Federal income tax need not be withheld on the “picked up” contributions.
Code section 414(h)(2) provides that contributions, otherwise designated as employee contributions, shall be treated as employer contributions if such contributions are made to a plan described in Code section 401(a), established by a state government or a political subdivision thereof, or any agency or instrumentality of any one of the foregoing, and are picked up by the employing unit.
The federal income tax treatment to be accorded contributions which are picked up by the employer within the meaning of Code section 414(h)(2) is specified in Revenue Ruling 77-462, 1977-2 C.B. 358. In that revenue ruling, the employer school district agreed to assume and pay the amounts employees were required by state law to contribute to a state pension plan. Rev. Rul. 77-462 concluded that the school district's picked up contributions to the plan are excluded from the employees’ gross income until such time as they are distributed to the employees. The revenue ruling held further that under the provisions of Code section 3401(a)(12)(A), the school district's contributions to the plan are excluded from wages for purposes of the Collection of Income Tax at Source on Wages; therefore, no withholding is required from the employees' salaries with respect to such picked up contributions.
3 200422060
The issue of whether contributions have been picked up by an employer within the meaning of Code section 414(h)(2) is addressed in Revenue Ruling 81-35, 1981-1 C.B. 255 and Revenue Ruling 81-36, 1981-1 C.B. 255. These revenue rulings established that the following two criteria must be met: (1) the employer must specify that the contributions, although designated as employee contributions, are being paid by the employer in lieu of contributions by the employee; and (2) the employee must not be given the option of choosing to receive the contributed amounts directly instead of having them paid by the employer to the pension plan. Furthermore, it is immaterial, for purposes of the applicability of Code section 414(h)(2), whether an employer picks up contributions through a reduction in salary, an offset against future salary increases, or a combination of both.
In Revenue Ruling 87-10, 1987-1 C.B. 136, the Internal Revenue Service considered whether contributions designated as employee contributions to a governmental plan are excludable from the gross income of the employee. The Service concluded that to satisfy the criteria set forth in Revenue Rulings 81-35 and 81-36 with respect to particular contributions, the required specification of designated employee contributions must be completed before the period to which such contributions relate.
Employer A's resolution satisfies the criteria set forth in Code section 414(h)(2), Revenue Ruling 81-35, and Revenue Ruling 81-36 by providing that Employer A will make contributions in lieu of contributions by eligible employees and that no employee will have the option of receiving the contribution instead of having it contributed to Plan X.
Accordingly, we conclude the amounts picked up by Employer A for employees shall be treated as employer contributions and will not be includable in employees’ gross income for the taxable year in which such amounts are contributed.
Because we have determined that the picked up amounts are to be treated as employer contributions, they are excepted from wages as defined in Code section 3401(a)(12)(A) for Federal income tax withholding purposes. Therefore, no withholding of Federal income tax is required from employees’ salaries with respect to such picked up amounts.
The effective date for the commencement of any proposed pick up cannot be any earlier than the later of the date the final resolution is signed or put into effect.
This ruling is based on the assumption that Plan X will be qualified under Code section 401(a) at the time of the proposed contributions and that Employer A is a
4 200422060
governmental unit, agency or instrumentality under Plan X and Code section 414(d).
No opinion is expressed as to whether the amounts in question are subject to tax under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act. No opinion is expressed as to whether the amounts in question are paid pursuant to a “salary reduction agreement’ within the meaning of Code section 3121 (v)(1)(B).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Code section 6110(k) provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.
For any questions regarding this ruling, please contact ........
A copy of this ruling is being sent to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office.
Sincerely yours,
Donzell Littlejohn,
Manager, Employee Plans
Technical Branch 4
Tax Exempt and Government
Entities Division
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace