PLR 200418047: Revised hospital reorganization preserves exempt status
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A healthcare system had already received an IRS ruling on a proposed reorganization, then reported changes to the plan. The changes included keeping one hospital as a division of another entity, merging an additional for-profit subsidiary, and revising the parent organization's bylaws. The IRS ruled that the changes would not disturb the entities' tax exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3) or their nonprivate foundation status under § 509(a). The conclusions depend on the stated facts remaining materially unchanged.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Do the revised reorganization terms affect the entities' exempt and nonprivate foundation status?
- Outcome: Approved: neither status is adversely affected on the stated facts.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(3), 509(a); Rev. Rul. 69-545.
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 200418047
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
Date: FEB -6 2004 Contact Person:
ID Number:
Telephone Number:
[illegible handwritten notation]
Employer Identification Number:
Legend:
A =
B =
C =
D =
E =
F =
Dear Sir or Madam:
This is in response to a letter from your authorized representative requesting a series of rulings on your behalf regarding the tax consequences associated with certain changes regarding a reorganization of a healthcare system.
In a letter dated August 12, 2003, the Internal Revenue Service ruled that a reorganization described in a request for rulings dated July 7, 2003, would not adversely affect the exempt entities’ tax exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and would not adversely affect their nonprivate foundation status under section 509(a) of the Code.
You have stated that the following are material changes to your ruling request of July 7, 2002:
(1) B remains a division of D and there will be no change in its ownership or operations as part of the reorganization. The latter’s Articles of Incorporation have been amended to remove B as a supported organization.
(2) Four wholly-owned for-profit subsidiaries of D will merge into D and cease to exist, instead of three.
(3) The Bylaws of A have been modified as follows: (1) the purposes of A no
-2- 200418047
longer reference “supporting” B; (2) an increase in the maximum percentage of members of A’s Board of Trustees who may be physicians who are active or retired staff of D from 25% to 40% (to now include in this percentage limitation the President of D’s medical staff as an ex-officio voting member; (3) four separate committees of the Board of Trustees; (4) the Vice-President of the Board of Trustees does not automatically advance to the Chairperson position and (5) the Secretary is elected by the Board of Trustees and not appointed by the President and Chief Executive Officer.
(4) E will amend its Articles of Incorporation to change its name to F.
A will serve as the parent and controlling organization of the reorganized system and will be the sole member of C, D and E and is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code and is classified as a nonprivate foundation under section 509(a).
B and C operate hospitals. They are exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code and are classified as nonprivate foundations under section 509(a).
D is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code and is classified as a nonprivate foundation under section 509(a). It operates hospitals.
E is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code and is classified as a nonprivate foundation under section 509(a). It solicits funds for the benefit of D.
You have requested the following rulings in connection with the modification to the reorganization described above:
-
The modifications to the reorganization will not adversely affect the exempt entities’
tax exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. -
The modifications to the reorganization will not adversely affect the exempt
entities’ nonprivate foundation status under section 509(a) of the Code.
Section 501(a) of the Code provides an exemption from federal income tax for organizations described in section 501(c)(3), including organizations that are organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational or scientific purposes.
Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the term “charitable” is used in section 501(c)(3) of the Code in its generally accepted legal sense.
- 200418047
Revenue Ruling 69-545, 1969-2 C.B. 117, acknowledges that the promotion of health is a charitable purpose within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Code.
The reorganization described herein will not adversely affect the tax exempt status of A, B, C, D or E under section 501(c)(3) of the Code as they will conduct activities that form the basis for their exemption from federal income tax. In addition, the reorganization will not adversely affect the nonprivate foundation status of these entities as the basis for their classification as nonprivate foundations under section 509(a) will not change.
Accordingly, based on all the facts and circumstances described above, we rule:
-
The modifications to the reorganization will not adversely affect the exempt entities’
current exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. -
The modifications to the reorganization will not adversely affect the exempt entities’
nonprivate foundation status under section 509(a) of the Code.
These rulings are based on the understanding that there will be no material changes in the facts upon which they are based.
These rulings are directed only to the organizations that requested them.
These rulings do not address the applicability of any section of the Code or regulations to the facts submitted other than with respect to the sections described.
Please keep a copy of these rulings in your permanent records.
Sincerely,
(signed) Marvin Friedlander
Marvin Friedlander
Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 1
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace