PLR 200416007: Consent to reelect foreign earned income exclusion

Number
200416007
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Reelection
Topics
Code sections
§ 911
Ruling dated
January 7, 2003
Publicly released
April 16, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer used the foreign earned income exclusion while working in one country, then revoked it and claimed a foreign tax credit. After moving to a different country for a new job, she asked to reelect the § 911 exclusion within the five-year period that requires IRS consent. The IRS granted consent for 2002 and later years, citing the changed country, tax treatment, and employer. The ruling did not decide whether her salary actually qualifies for the exclusion, including whether her employer counts as the U.S. government.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer reelect the foreign earned income exclusion after revoking it within the prior five years?
  • Outcome: Approved for reelection, with substantive eligibility left open.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 911; Treas. Reg. § 1.911-7(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200416007
Release Date: 4/16/04
Index Number: 911.11-03

---------------------------
Person To Contact:
-----------------------
-----------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:

  • CC: INTL: B02 – PLR-156397-03
    Date: January 7, 2003
     -
     -
    
     DO:SBSE, Area 15            TY: -------
    

LEGEND
Taxpayer = -----------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------

Bank Y = ----------------------------------

Country A = -----------
Country B = ---------------

C percent = ------------
D percent = ------------

Dear -----------------:

This is in response to a letter dated September 18, 2003, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, requesting permission to reelect the provisions of section 911 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) for tax year ------- and subsequent tax years. Additional information was submitted on November 18, 2003 and December 19, 2003.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination. 2

Taxpayer worked in Country A in 1997, and she excluded her foreign earned income under section 911. Due to the high rate of tax in Country A in comparison to the U.S. tax rate, Taxpayer revoked her section 911 foreign earned income election on her 1998 federal income tax return by taking a credit for the amount of the foreign taxes paid. Taxpayer represents that she has not taken foreign tax credits attributable to income excluded under section 911 and applied them to income earned in 1998 or subsequent taxable years.

On or about August 14, 2002, Taxpayer moved to Country B and began employment with a new employer, Bank Y. Bank Y is an international organization, of which the U.S. is a member. As such, Taxpayer has diplomatic status and pays no income tax to Country B. The U.S. owns C percent share of the capital and holds D percent of the voting power of Bank Y. Taxpayer wants to reelect the section 911 foreign earned income exclusion for tax year 2002 and subsequent tax years.

Treas. Reg. §1.911-7(b) provides that if an individual revoked an election to exclude foreign earned income under section 911(a) and within five taxable years the individual wishes to reelect the exclusion, then the individual may apply for consent to the reelection by requesting a ruling from the Associate Chief Counsel (International). In determining whether to consent to a reelection, the Associate Chief Counsel (International) or his delegate may consider any facts and circumstances relevant to the determination. Relevant facts and circumstances may include a move from one foreign country to another foreign country with differing tax rates, and a change of employer.

Accordingly, based solely on the information and representations set forth above, it is held that Taxpayer may reelect the section 911 foreign earned income exclusion for tax year 2002 and subsequent tax years.

No opinion is expressed as to whether Taxpayer satisfied the requirements for the exclusion provided under section 911(a) of the Code. In particular, no opinion is expressed about whether Taxpayer is employed by the U.S. government and thus, is not eligible to exclude her salary under section 911.

A copy of this ruling letter should be attached to Taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the relevant year.

A copy of this letter is being sent to the Taxpayer’s authorized representative.
3

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(j)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Phyllis E. Marcus
Branch Chief, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief
Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace