PLR 200409005: Research credit group may revoke alternative incremental credit election

Number
200409005
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Alternative Incremental Credit
Code sections
§ 41
Ruling dated
November 12, 2003
Publicly released
February 27, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation had elected the alternative incremental method of computing the research credit for itself and its controlled group. It requested consent to revoke the election before the return due date for a later tax year. The IRS granted permission to revoke it for qualified research expenses paid or incurred in that year. The group should use the general § 41(a) credit computation for that year and later years unless the corporation makes a new alternative-method election. The IRS did not decide whether any reported expenditures were qualified research expenses.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the corporation and its controlled group revoke their alternative incremental research credit election?
  • Outcome: Approved for the stated tax year and later years, subject to any new election.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 41(a), 41(c)(4), 41(f)(1).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200409005
Release Date: 2/27/04
Index Number: 41.01-00

-----------------------------
Person To Contact:
---------------------------
---------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
-
CC:PSI:B07 – PLR-152172-03
Date:
November 12, 2003

Legend:

Corporation = -----------------------------
-----------------------
x = --------------------------
y = --------------------------

Dear Sir:

This letter responds to a letter received from your authorized representative, dated August 28, 2003, requesting permission for Corporation to revoke its election under
§ 41(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The represented facts are as follows:

Corporation is an accrual and completed contract method taxpayer with a calendar taxable year. Corporation is the parent of a § 41(f)(1) controlled group, all the members of which are included in Corporation’s consolidated group. For the taxable year ending on x, Corporation elected to utilize the alternative incremental research credit rules under § 41(c)(4) to calculate its research credit, for itself and on behalf of its § 41(f)(1) controlled group. Before the due date for its return (including extensions) for the taxable year ending on y, Corporation submitted a request, for itself and on behalf of its
§ 41(f)(1) controlled group, to revoke its election to determine its research credit under the alternative incremental research credit rules of § 41(c)(4) for qualified research expenses paid or incurred on or after the taxable year ending on y and all subsequent years.

For taxable years beginning after June 30, 1996, taxpayers may elect to determine their research credit under the alternative incremental research credit rules of § 41(c)(4). Section 41(c)(4)(B) provides that any election under § 41(c)(4)(A) shall apply for the taxable year in which made and all succeeding taxable years unless revoked with the consent of the Secretary.

2
PLR-152172-03

Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we grant permission for Corporation to revoke its election to determine its credit for increasing research activities under the alternative incremental research credit rules of § 41(c)(4) for qualified research expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year ending on y. Corporation and its § 41(f)(1) controlled group should compute the research credit for the taxable year ending on y and all succeeding years using the general rule of § 41(a), provided that Corporation does not make a new election to determine its credit for increasing research activities under the alternative incremental research credit rules of
§ 41(c)(4) in a later year.

Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Further, we express or imply no opinion concerning expenditures Corporation or any member of its controlled group treated as qualified research expenses.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative. A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda M. Stewart
Senior Counsel
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace