PLR 200408035: Foreign housing grant furthers foundation's charitable purposes

Plain-English summary

A private foundation proposed funding housing construction and repairs through the government of an impoverished foreign country. The housing would serve people displaced by a natural disaster and others living in inadequate conditions, using recipient lists and oversight rules described in the grant agreement. The IRS ruled that the grant would serve charitable purposes and count as a qualifying distribution. On the stated facts, it would not create unrelated business taxable income or the listed private foundation excise taxes, and the foundation would not need expenditure responsibility for the grant to the foreign government. Payments to an independent project manager would be compensation for services and qualifying distributions, not grants.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Does the proposed foreign housing grant qualify as charitable activity without triggering unrelated business income or private foundation excise taxes?
• Outcome: Approved on the stated facts and grant controls.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(3), 4940-4945, 513; Treas. Reg. § 53.4945-5(a)(4)(iii).

Full text (IRS public release)

200408035

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION
Date: NOV 25 2003 Contact Person:
Identification Number:
Contact Number:
Employer Identification Number:
U.I.L. Nos.
501.03-15
4940.00-00
LEGEND
4941.04-00
4942.03-05
M = 4943.03-00
X = 4944.00-00
4945.04-05
513.00-00
Dear Sir or Madam: 4945.04-04

We have considered your request dated September 30, 2002 for rulings that X's proposed grant for housing will further its exempt purposes under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and will not result in unrelated business taxable income or liability under chapter 42.

Facts

X is a private foundation described in sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a) of the Code. X proposes to make a Grant to the Government of M (an impoverished foreign country) for housing for residents. The majority of the people of M live below the officially recognized poverty level. Natural disaster damage some years ago has left many thousands homeless and forced to live in metal and wood containers (used to transport humanitarian aid to the region), without toilets or running water. Others continue to live in damaged, overcrowded housing.

A public charity, working with an advisory board composed of academics, government officials, and community representatives, created a list of families in need of better housing. Requirements for inclusion on the list include the following:

1. lost home in natural disaster;

2. dwelling in a container;

3. monthly expenditures less than a low specified amount;

4. resident of the district at time of natural disaster and now; and
5. no receipt of any subsidy for adequate housing

200408035

Preference is given for people with additional burdens (e.g., elderly, disabled, large family). The Government will create a similar list for people who reside in other inadequate and unsanitary housing. The Government will maintain and update these Housing Recipient lists.

With the assistance of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Government has selected certain apartment buildings owned and operated by the municipal government as needing repair or renovation. The Government is also planning some new housing construction that the municipal government will own and operate. The Grant will fund this construction, repair, and renovation.

Residents of the new or repaired/renovated housing must come from the Housing Recipient Lists. The Government will make its selections by lottery unless a person has a possessive right to the housing unit. A person has a possessive right if the person is on a Housing Recipient List and can demonstrate a possessive right to the repaired/renovated unit immediately prior to the natural disaster.

The right to occupy the unit shall be granted free of charge (aside from a nominal and customary charge) provided that the recipient agrees to occupy the unit, and not transfer or sell the right of occupancy, for a certain number of years.

The Grant involves the disbursement of funds as needed, up to a maximum amount. The Government Is neither a disqualified person with respect to X nor controlled by disqualified persons. The Government has agreed that the terms of Grant agreement will not be overridden or unduly burdened by taxes or other laws in M. Under the terms of the Grant, the Government must: use the funds exclusively for the purpose of constructing the specified public housing; immediately return to X any funds not so used; not disburse any Grant funds to any disqualified person with respect to X or for any purpose prohibited under section 4945(d)(1)-(3); hold Grant funds in a separate segregated account; maintain books and records on the progress of construction, available for inspection by X; and make progress reports to X regarding the construction and the Housing Recipient Lists. X may terminate the Grant upon discovery of any diversion or misuse of funds, or without cause upon reasonable notice. The Government must use standardized bidding documents and procedures to secure contractors’ services and supplies, except where the Government believes that a particular contractor is uniquely qualified for a portion of the work, and the project manager concurs and finds the contract terms fair and reasonable.

X has hired an on-site Project Manager (who will not be a disqualified person with respect to X) to monitor the Government’s compliance with the terms of the Grant Agreement. X retains the right to approve the selection of contractors and housing recipients, and requests for disbursements, to ensure compliance with the Grant Agreement. X will also have the Government hire supervisors to enforce compliance with construction codes and design specifications.

Rulings Requested

X requests the following rulings:

200408035

A. The Grant is for exclusively charitable, program-related activities for purposes of the Code because it will be used exclusively to provide housing to the needy and vulnerable in M, to relieve conditions of poverty and to combat community deterioration.

B. The funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant will not cause the imposition of any of the private foundation excise taxes, and specifically:

1. The tax on net investment income under section 4940 does not apply because if any
   funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant are required to be repaid to X, such funds represent a repayment of principal not taxable under section 4940 rather than net investment income;

2. The Government of M is unrelated to X, and the funds disbursed pursuant to
   the Grant to the Government of M will not create any self-dealing pursuant to section 4941, and furthermore there is no indirect act of self-dealing under the facts described;

3. The funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant are qualifying distributions for
   purposes of meeting the minimum qualifying distribution amount under section 4942;

4. The funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant do not create any “business
   holdings” within the meaning of section 4943;

5. The funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant do not create any jeopardizing
   investments within the meaning of section 4944;

6. The funds provided pursuant to the Grant are for exclusively charitable
   purposes and are not taxable expenditures pursuant to, and are not subject to the expenditure responsibility rules of, section 4945 because the Grant is made to the Government of M and the Government will make no secondary grants of the funds, but only payments of compensation for goods and services received; and

C. The Grant will not give rise to unrelated business taxable income under sections 511-513.

D. The payments to the Project Manager are fees for personal services rendered in connection with X's program-related charitable activities, and are qualifying distributions made in furtherance of X’s exempt purposes, as compensation and not “grants.”

Law

Sections 170(c)(2)(B) and 501(c)(3) of the Code both refer to organizations organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes.

200408035

Section 511 of the Code imposes a tax on the unrelated business taxable income of exempt organizations.

Section 512 of the Code defines "unrelated business taxable income" as gross income derived from any unrelated trade or business regularly carried on by it, less certain deductions and modifications.

Section 513(a) of the Code defines "unrelated trade or business" as any trade or business the conduct of which is not substantially related (aside from the need of such organization for income or funds or the use it makes of the profits derived) to the exercise or performance by such organization of its exempt purpose or function.

Section 513(c) of the Code provides that “trade or business” includes any activity which is carried on for the production of income from the sale of goods or the performance of services. For purposes of the preceding sentence, an activity does not lose identity as a trade or business merely because it is carried on within a larger aggregate of similar activities or within a larger complex of other endeavors which may, or may not, be related to the exempt purposes of the organization. Where an activity carried on for profit constitutes an unrelated trade or business, no part of such trade or business shall be excluded from such classification merely because it does not result in profit.

Section 4940 of the Code imposes an excise tax on the net investment income of a private foundation.

Section 4941 of the Code imposes an excise tax on each act of self-dealing between a disqualified person and a private foundation.

Section 4941(d)(1) of the Code defines self-dealing as any direct or indirect

(A) sale or exchange, or leasing, of property between a private foundation and a disqualified person;

(B) lending of money or other extension of credit between a private foundation and a disqualified person;

(C) furnishing of goods, services, or facilities between a private foundation and a disqualified person;

(D) payment of compensation (or payment or reimbursement of expenses) by a private foundation to a disqualified person;

(E) transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of, a disqualified person of the income or assets of a private foundation.

(F) agreement by a private foundation to make any payment of money or other property

200408035

to a government official (as defined in section 4946(c)), other than certain employment agreements.

Section 4941(d)(2)(D) of the Code provides that the furnishing of goods, services, or facilities by a private foundation to a disqualified person shall not be an act of self-dealing if such furnishing is made on a basis no more favorable than that on which such goods, services, or facilities are made available to the general public.

Section 4942 of the Code imposes an excise tax on a private foundation's undistributed income, defined as its distributable amount less qualifying distributions.

Section 4942(g)(1)(A) of the Code defines a “qualifying distribution” as including any amount (including that portion of reasonable and necessary administrative expenses) paid to accomplish one or more purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B), other than certain contributions to organizations controlled by the foundation or by disqualified persons or to private non-operating foundations.

Section 4943 of the Code imposes an excise tax on the excess holdings by a private foundation in business enterprises.

Section 4944 of the Code imposes an excise tax on a private foundation's making of an investment in such a manner as to jeopardize the carrying out of any of its exempt purposes.

Section 4944(c) of the Code provides that an investment is not jeopardizing if its primary purpose is to accomplish 170(c)(2)(B) purposes and no significant purpose is the production of income or the appreciation of property.

Section 4945 of the Code imposes an excise tax on each taxable expenditure of a private foundation.

Section 4945(d) of the Code defines a "taxable expenditure" by a private foundation as an amount paid or incurred--

(1) to attempt to influence legislation,

(2) to influence a specific public election or carry on a voter registration drive,

(3) to grant funds to an individual for travel, study, or similar purposes unless certain requirements are met,

(4) to grant funds to an organization unless it is described in sections 509(a)(1), (2), or (3) or 4940(d)(2) or unless the private foundation exercises expenditure responsibility with respect to the grant in accordance with section 4945(h), or

(5) for a non-170(c)(2)(B) purpose.

Section 4946 of the Code defines "disqualified persons" with respect to a private foundation as substantial contributors, foundation managers, 20% owners of a substantial contributor, family members of an individual who is one of the above, entities 35% owned by

200408035

one of the above, and certain government officials.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the term "charitable" includes relief of the poor and distressed or of the underprivileged; erection or maintenance of public buildings, monuments, or works; lessening of the burdens of Government; and promotion of social welfare by organizations designed to combat community deterioration.

Section 1.513-1(b) of the regulations provides that for purposes of section 513 the term “trade or business” has the same meaning it has in section 162, and generally includes any activity carried on for the production of income from the sale of goods or performance of services.

Section 53.4941(d)-3(b)(1) of the regulations provides generally that under section 4941(d)(2)(D) of the Code, the furnishing of goods, services, or facilities by a private foundation to a disqualified person shall not be an act of self-dealing if such goods, services, or facilities are made available to the general public on at least as favorable a basis as they are made available to the disqualified person, so long as such goods, services, or facilities are functionally related to the exercise or performance by a private foundation of its charitable, educational, or other purpose or function constituting the basis for its exemption under section 501(c)(3).

Section 53.4941(d)-3(b)(2) of the regulations provides that for purposes of this paragraph, the term “general public” shall include those persons who, because of the particular nature of the activities of the private foundation, would be reasonably expected to utilize such goods, services, or facilities. This paragraph shall not apply, however, unless there is a substantial number of persons other than disqualified persons who are actually utilizing such goods, services, or facilities. Thus, a private foundation which furnishes recreational or park facilities to the general public may furnish such facilities to a disqualified person provided they are furnished to him on a basis which is not more favorable than that on which they are furnished to the general public.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(a)(2) of the regulations defines a “qualifying distribution" as including any amount (including program-related investments and reasonable and necessary administrative expenses) paid to accomplish 170(c)(2)(B) purposes, other than certain contributions to organizations controlled by the foundation or one or more disqualified persons or to non-operating private foundations.

Section 53.4943-10(b) of the regulations provides that business holdings do not include program-related investments.

Section 53.4944-3(a)(1) of the regulations defines a “program-related investment” as an investment which possesses the following characteristics:

(i) its primary purpose is to accomplish 170(c)(2)(B) purposes;

(ii) No significant purpose is the production of income or the appreciation of property; and

(iii) No purpose is to accomplish 170(c)(2)(D) purposes.

200408035

Section 53.4945-2(a)(5)(i) of the regulations provides that a grant by a private foundation to an organization described in section 509(a)(1), (2) or (3) of the Code does not constitute a taxable expenditure by the foundation under section 4945(d), other than under section 4945(d)(1), if the grant by the private foundation is not earmarked to be used for any activity described in section 4945(d)(2) or (5), is not earmarked to be used in a manner which would violate section 4945(d)(3) or (4), and there does not exist an agreement, oral or written, whereby the grantor foundation may cause the grantee to engage in any such prohibited activity or to select the recipient to which the grant is to be devoted. For purposes of this paragraph (a)(5)(i), a grant by a private foundation is earmarked if the grant is given pursuant to an agreement, oral or written, that the grant will be used for specific purposes.

Section 53.4945-2(a)(5)(ii) of the regulations provides that for purposes of section 53.4945- 2, an organization shall be considered a section 509(a)(1) organization if it is treated as such under section 53.4945-5(a)(4) of the regulations.

Section 53.4945-2(a)(6)(ii) of the regulations provides that a grant by a private foundation to fund a specific project of a public charity is not a taxable expenditure by the foundation under section 4945(d)(1) of the Code to the extent that—

(A) The grant is not earmarked, within the meaning of section 53.4945-2(a)(5)(i) of the regulations, to be used in an attempt to influence legislation, and

(B) The amount of the grant, together with other grants by the same private foundation for the same project for the same year, does not exceed the amount budgeted, for the year of the grant, by the grantee organization for activities of the project that are not attempts to influence legislation. If the grant is for more than one year, the preceding sentence applies to each year of the grant with the amount of the grant measured by the amount actually disbursed by the private foundation in each year or divided equally between years, at the option of the private foundation. The same method of measuring the annual amount must be used in all years of a grant. This paragraph (a)(6)(ii) applies without regard to whether the public charity has made the election under section 501(h).

Section 53.4945-2(a)(6)(iii) of the regulations provides that for purposes of determining the amount budgeted by a prospective grantee for specific project activities that are not attempts to influence legislation under section 53.4945-2(a)(6)(ii), a private foundation may rely on budget documents or other sufficient evidence supplied by the grantee organization (such as a signed Statement by an authorized officer, director or trustee of such grantee organization) showing the proposed budget of the specific project, unless the private foundation doubts or, in light of all the facts and circumstances, reasonably should doubt the accuracy or reliability of the documents.

Section 53.4945-4(a)(2) of the regulations provides that, for purposes of section 4945 of the Code, the term “grants” shall include, but is not limited to, such expenditures as scholarships, fellowships, internships, prizes, and awards. Grants shall also include loans for purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B) and “program related investments” (such as investments in small businesses in central cities or in businesses which assist in neighborhood renovation). Similarly, “grants” include such expenditures as payments to exempt organizations to be used in furtherance

200408035

of such recipient organizations’ exempt purposes whether or not such payments are solicited by such recipient organizations. Conversely, “grants” do not ordinarily include salaries or other compensation to employees. For example, “grants” do not ordinarily include educational payments to employees which are includible in the employees’ incomes pursuant to section 61. In addition, “grants” do not ordinarily include payments (including salaries, consultants' fees and reimbursement for travel expenses such as transportation, board, and lodging) to persons (regardless of whether such persons are individuals) for personal services in assisting a foundation in planning, evaluating or developing projects or areas of program activity by consulting, advising, or participating in conferences organized by the foundation.

Section 53.4945-4(a)(4)(ii) of the regulations provides that a grant by a private foundation to an organization described in section 509(a)(1), (2), or (3) of the Code, which the grantee organization uses to make payments to an individual for purposes described in section 4945(d)(3), shall not be regarded as a grant by the private foundation to the individual grantee (regardless of the application of section 53.4945-4(a)(4)(i) of the regulations) if the grant is made for a project which is to be undertaken under the supervision of the section 509(a)(1), (2), or (3) organization and such grantee organization controls the selection of the individual grantee. This rule shall apply regardless of whether the name of the individual grantee was first proposed by the private foundation, but only if there is an objective manifestation of the section 509(a), (1), (2), or (3) organization's control over the selection process, although the selection need not be made completely independently of the private foundation. For purposes of this rule, an organization shall be considered a section 509(a)(1) organization if it is treated as such under section 53.4945-5(a)(4).

Section 53.4945-5(a)(2) of the regulations cross-references section 53.4945-4(a) for the definition of grants for purposes of section 4945(d)(4) of the Code.

Section 53.4945-5(a)(4)(iii) of the regulations provides that a foreign government (or agency or instrumentality) is treated as a 509(a)(1) organization for purposes of section 53.4945-5 even if it is not described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. However, a grant to any such organization must be made exclusively for 170(c)(2)(B) purposes.

Section 53.4945-5(a)(6)(i) of the regulations provides that a grant by a private foundation to a grantee organization which the grantee organization uses to make payments to another organization (the secondary grantee) shall not be regarded as a grant by the private foundation to the secondary grantee if the foundation does not earmark the use of the grant for any named secondary grantee and there does not exist an agreement, oral or written, whereby such grantor foundation may cause the selection of the secondary grantee by the organization to which it has given the grant. For such purpose, a grant described herein shall not be regarded as a grant by the foundation to the secondary grantee even though such foundation has reason to believe that certain organizations would derive benefits from such grant so long as the original grantee organization exercises control, in fact, over the selection process and actually makes the selection completely independently of the private foundation.

Rev. Rul. 70-585, 1970-2 C.B. 115, stated that it is held generally that where an organization is formed for charitable purposes and accomplishes its charitable purposes through a

200408035

program of providing housing for low and, in certain circumstances, moderate income families, it is entitled to exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The ruling set forth several situations. In Situation 1, an organization was formed to develop a program for new home construction and the renovation of existing homes for sale to low income families on long-term, low-payment plans. It purchased homes for renovation and lots for building new homes throughout the city in which it was located. It built new homes for sale to low income families who qualified for loans under a Federal housing program and who could not obtain financing through conventional channels. It also aided financially those families eligible for the loans who did not have the necessary down payment. Rehabilitated homes were made available to families who could not qualify for any type of mortgage loan. The cost of these homes was recovered, if possible, through very small periodic payments. The organization derived its operating funds through Federal loans and contributions from the general public. Where possible, renovations were made with volunteer help. The Service reasoned that by providing homes for low income families who otherwise could not afford them, the organization relieved the poor and distressed, and thus qualified under section 501(c)(3). The determination of what constitutes low income is a factual question based on all of the surrounding circumstances. In Situation 3, an organization was formed to formulate plans for the renewal and rehabilitation of a particular area in a city as a residential community. Studies of the area showed that the median income level in the area was lower than in other sections of the city and the housing located in the area generally old and badly deteriorated. The organization's membership was composed of the residents, businesses, and community organizations in the area. The organization cooperated with the local redevelopment authority in providing residents of the area with decent, safe, and sanitary housing without relocating them outside the area. The organization developed an overall plan for the rehabilitation of the area: sponsored a renewal project in which the residents themselves took the initiative; and arranged monthly meetings to involve residents in the planning for the renewal of the area. As part of the renewal project, it purchased an apartment house that it planned to rehabilitate and rent at cost to low and moderate income families with preference given to residents of the area. The organization was supported by Federal funds, membership fees, and contributions. The Service reasoned that the organization's purposes and activities combatted community deterioration by assisting in the rehabilitation of an old and run-down residential area, and thus the organization qualified under section 501 (c)(3).

Rev. Rul. 71-460, 1971-2 C.B. 231, held that a 501(c)(3) organization may conduct part or all of its charitable activities in a foreign country.

Rev. Rul. 74-125, 1974-1 C.B. 327, held that a private foundation's payments to consultants were not grants under section 4945(d)(3) of the Code. The foundation’s activities included disseminating publications and developing and conducting training programs to assist educators in using improved educational methods. The consultants’ services included the development of model curricula in a particular educational area and the design of materials to assist educators in the performance of their educational functions. The Service reasoned that the consultants’ services were personal services assisting the foundation in planning and developing its projects under section 53.4945-4(a)(2) of the regulations.

Rev. Proc. 76-47, 1976-2 C.B. 670, provides guidelines for determining whether a grant made by a private foundation under an employer-related grant program to an employee or child is a scholarship or fellowship grant subject to the provisions of section 117(a) of the Code. Section

200408035

-10-

4.02 provides that selection of grant recipients must be made by a committee consisting wholly of individuals totally independent and separate from the private foundation, its organizer, and the employer concerned. However, the forwarding of the selections by the independent selection committee to the employer or private foundation for the sole purpose of verifying the eligibility requirements and selection criteria followed by the committee in considering the candidates and in making its selection will not disqualify the program.

Rev. Rul. 76-408, 1976-2 C.B. 145, held exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code an organization that provided interest-free loans to homeowners in a badly deteriorated urban residential area. Homeowners used the loans to make repairs to their homes necessary to meet local housing code regulations. To obtain a loan, homeowners had to qualify under low income standards as determined by an appropriate government agency and show that they were unable to obtain a loan elsewhere. The organization periodically reviewed the work on the repairs to assure that the funds were used for the stated purpose. The Service reasoned that the organization relieved the poor and distressed.

Rev. Proc. 96-32, 1996-1 C.B. 717, sets forth a safe harbor and a facts-and- circumstances test under which organizations that provide low-income housing are considered charitable as relieving the poor and distressed. The Service acknowledged that providing housing for low-income persons accomplishes charitable purposes by relieving the poor and distressed, and that poor and distressed beneficiaries must be needy in the sense that they cannot afford the necessities of life, including adequate housing. The safe harbor uses HUD definitions for "low-income" persons that are not readily applicable outside the United States, requires that most of the housing (setting forth minimum percentages) be actually occupied by low- and very-low-income persons, and requires that the housing be affordable to the charitable beneficiaries, such as through government-imposed rent restrictions. The facts-and- circumstances test for relieving the poor and distressed considers all the surrounding facts and circumstances, such as the following:

(1) A substantially greater percentage of residents than required by the safe harbor with incomes up to 120 percent of the area's very low-income limit.

(2) Limited degree of deviation from the safe harbor percentages.

(3) Limitation of a resident's portion of rent or mortgage payment to ensure that the housing is affordable to low-income and very low-income residents.

(4) Participation in a government housing program designed to provide affordable housing.

(5) Operation through a community-based board of directors, particularly if the selection process demonstrates that community groups have input into the organization's operations.

(6) The provision of additional social services affordable to the poor residents.

200408035

-11-

(7) Relationship with an existing 501(c)(3) organization active in low-income housing for at least five years if the existing organization demonstrates control.

(8) Acceptance of residents who, when considered individually, have unusual burdens such as extremely high medical costs which cause them to be in a condition similar to persons within the qualifying income limits in spite of their higher incomes.

(9) Participation in a homeownership program designed to provide homeownership opportunities for families that cannot otherwise afford to purchase safe and decent housing.

(10) Existence of affordability covenants or restrictions running with the property. Rationale Each of the requested rulings is discussed in turn below.

A. We are satisfied under the circumstances presented that the Grant will be made exclusively for the charitable purposes under sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2)(B) of the Code of relieving the poor and distressed or underprivileged and combatting community deterioration. Moreover, X has taken reasonable steps to ensure that the Grant will be used exclusively for the intended charitable purposes and not diverted for non-charitable purposes.

B.1. The Grant program as described will not generate any net income or capital gain for X. Therefore, a return to X of grant funds would not result in net investment income that would be taxable under section 4940 of the Code.

B.2. Section 4941 of the Code defines self-dealing as certain direct or indirect transactions between a private foundation and a disqualified person. The Government of M is not a disqualified person with respect to X, and therefore the Grant is not a direct act of self-dealing. Moreover, we find no indirect self-dealing under the facts described.

B.3. A qualifying distribution under section 4942 of the Code generally includes a grant paid to a foreign government to accomplish charitable purposes. Since the Government of M is not controlled by disqualified persons with respect to X, the Grant will be a qualifying distribution.

B.4. X will not receive anything in return for its Grant, including any kind of ownership interest in a business enterprise that would constitute a business holding under section 4943 of the Code. Moreover, X’s making of the Grant is not itself a trade or business that would constitute a sole proprietorship of X or a joint venture with the Government of M.

B.5. X’s Grant, in which X does not expect to receive back any principal and will not in any event receive net income or gain, is not an investment in the ordinary financial sense of the term. If the Grant were considered an investment under section 4944 of the

200408035

-12-

Code, then it would constitute a program-related investment.

B.6. The Grant is not earmarked for purposes set forth in sections 4945(d)(1), (2), and (3) of the Code, and the Grant Agreement prohibits the use of Grant funds for such purposes. X need not exercise expenditure responsibility under section 4945(h) with respect to the Grant, because the Government of M is deemed a 509(a)(1) organization for such purposes, and the Government of M will make no secondary grants of the funds, but only payments of compensation for goods and services received. Moreover, X’s review and approval of contracts and housing recipients to ensure conformity with the terms of the Grant agreement is not the equivalent of earmarking funds for such persons.

C. X's Grant activity is not a trade or business within the meaning of section 513 of the Code, because there is no expectation of any profit (or even return of capital) from the activity. If the activity were considered a trade or business, then it would be a related trade or business, because it contributes importantly to the accomplishment of X's charitable purposes.

D. The services to be provided by the Project Manager are consulting services like those described in Rev. Rul. 74-125 to assist the foundation in planning and developing its projects. Thus, under sections 53.4945-4(a)(2) and 5(a)(2) of the regulations, X’s payments to the Project Manager, while qualifying distributions made in furtherance of X's exempt purposes, are compensation and not grants.

Rulings

Accordingly, we rule as follows:

A. The Grant is for exclusively charitable, program-related activities for purposes of sections 501(c)(3) and 170(c)(2)(B) of the Code because it will be used exclusively to provide housing to the needy and vulnerable in M, to relieve conditions of poverty and to combat community deterioration.

B. The funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant will not cause the imposition of any of the private foundation excise taxes, and specifically:

1. The tax on net investment income under section 4940 does not apply because if any
   funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant are required to be repaid to X, such funds represent a repayment of principal not taxable under section 4940 rather than net investment income:

2. The Government of M is unrelated to X, and the funds disbursed pursuant to
   the Grant to the Government of M will not create any self-dealing pursuant to section 4941, and furthermore there is no indirect act of self-dealing under the facts described;

3. The funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant are qualifying distributions for

200408035

-13-

purposes of meeting the minimum qualifying distribution amount under section 4942;

4. The funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant do not create any “business
   holdings” within the meaning of section 4943;

5. The funds disbursed pursuant to the Grant do not create any jeopardizing
   investments within the meaning of section 4944:

6. The funds provided pursuant to the Grant are for exclusively charitable
   purposes and are not taxable expenditures pursuant to, and are not subject to the expenditure responsibility rules of, section 4945 because the Grant is made to the Government of M and the Government will make no secondary grants of the funds, but only payments of compensation for goods and services received; and

C. The Grant will not give rise to unrelated business taxable income under sections 511-513.

D. The payments to the Project Manager are fees for personal services rendered in connection with X's program-related charitable activities, and are qualifying distributions made in furtherance of X’s exempt purposes, as compensation and not “grants.”

Except as we have ruled above, we express no opinion as to the tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions of the Code or under any other provisions of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to X. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Because this letter could help resolve future tax questions, you should keep a copy of this ruling in your permanent records.

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Terrell M. Berkovsky
Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 2