PLR 200404051: IRA rollover waiver letter with conflicting facts and amounts

Number
200404051
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Rollover Contributions
Code sections
§ 408
Ruling dated
October 30, 2003
Publicly released
January 23, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The request describes a woman who had suffered a stroke, moved to assisted living, and faced unexpected home repair costs. She sought a waiver of the 60 day IRA rollover deadline for an amount labeled F. The IRS letter says it grants a waiver and another 60 days to contribute an amount labeled D, subject to the other rollover rules. The published letter is internally inconsistent: its analysis refers to a wife's injury and hospitalization, and its ruling names D even though the request names F and says D was already put back within 60 days. The ruling's precise reach is therefore unclear from the released text.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would disability and relocation difficulties justify waiving the 60 day IRA rollover deadline?
  • Outcome: The letter grants a waiver, but conflicting facts and amount labels make its scope unclear.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 408(d)(3)(I); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
200404051

TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES DIVISION
OCT 30 2003




T:EP:RA:T4

Legend:
Individual A = ****
Broker B =
*
IRA X =
*****
Amount C = $
*
Amount D = $
*
Amount E = $
*
Amount F = $
****

Dear Individual A:

This is in response to a request submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative by letter dated July 1, 2003, for a ruling to waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).

The following facts and representation have been submitted under penalties of perjury to support the ruling request.

200404051

Page 2

In 1996, Individual A suffered from a stroke that forced her into retirement and onto disability insurance. Maintaining a home with her disabilities became so burdensome she applied to an assisted living community, and around June 2002 an apartment opened up.

A supporting schedule for Individual A’s federal income tax return for 2002 shows that Individual A withdrew Amount C from IRA X in 2002, and re- contributed Amount D back into IRA X within 60 days. Amount E is an IRA distribution, and reported on her federal income tax return for 2002. Individual A requests a waiver in order to rollover Amount F into her IRA.

Individual A used Amount E for the purposes of making a down payment on her apartment and for unexpected repairs to her home in order to prepare it for sale.

Because Individual A was disabled plus the turmoil caused by relocating and unexpected substantial repairs to her home, she could not reasonably satisfy the 60-day rollover limitation.

Based on the above facts, you request a ruling that the Service waive the 60- day rollover requirement with respect to the portion of the distribution from IRA X of Amount F, because the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience under the provisions of section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if—

200404051


Page 3

(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or

(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the

day of such receipt such individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA, which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration,

200404051

Page 4

restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

It is represented that the 1-year rollover limitation under section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code is not applicable in your case.

Information presented demonstrates substantial hardship by reason of the turmoil caused by your wife’s injury and hospitalization and its impact upon your ability to timely deposit the amount you received into an IRA. The failure to waive the 60-day requirement would be against equity or good conscience.

Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of IRA X of the Amount D. You are granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute Amount D, in cash, into another IRA provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code are satisfied, except the 60-day requirement with respect to such contribution, then, this amount will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may be applicable thereto.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney on file in this office.

200404051

Page 5

If you have any questions please contact [illegible], at [illegible].

Sincerely yours,

Alan C. Pipkin, Jr., Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 4

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of this letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose, Notice 437

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace