PLR 200404032: IRS declines to rule on bonus depreciation election request

Number
200404032
Outcome
Other outcome
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Section 168; MACRS
Code sections
§ 168
Ruling dated
October 22, 2003
Publicly released
January 23, 2004

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2004, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2004
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation omitted the statement electing out of 30 percent additional first year depreciation for qualified property, although its timely filed return did not claim the deduction. It asked for more time to make the election under § 168(k)(2)(C)(iii). The IRS said the request appeared to fall under Rev. Proc. 2003-50, which provides a deemed election when its conditions are met. It therefore declined to rule and said it would refund the user fee.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will the IRS extend the time to elect out of additional first year depreciation?
  • Outcome: No ruling issued; the IRS referred the taxpayer to Rev. Proc. 2003-50.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 168(k)(2)(C)(iii); Rev. Proc. 2003-50, § 3.02(2).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200404032
Release Date: 01/23/2004
Index Number: 9100.04-00

------------------------------------------------------------ Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------------------- ----------------, ID No. -------------
------------------------
Telephone Number:
-----------------------
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
In Re: Request for an Extension of Time to CC:PSI:6 – PLR-138251-03
Make a Regulatory Election
Date:
--------------------------------------------------- October 22, 2003
-----------------
------------------------
-----------------------

Taxpayer = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
Parent = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
x = -------------------
y = -------------------

Dear ---------------:

This letter responds to a letter submitted by Parent on behalf of Taxpayer, dated x, requesting a letter ruling under ' 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to extend the time to make the election provided under section 168(k)(2)(C)(iii) of the Internal Revenue Code, not to deduct the 30-percent additional first year depreciation for qualified property placed in service in the taxable year that included September 11, 2001.

Parent and Taxpayer represent that Taxpayer is a member of an affiliated group that files a consolidated federal income tax return and the return for the taxable year ended y, which included September 11, 2001, was timely filed. On this return, Taxpayer did not deduct the 30-percent additional first year depreciation for all qualified property placed in service during the taxable year ended y, but inadvertently failed to attach the election out statement to the return.

Rev. Proc. 2003-50, 2003-29 I.R.B. 119, amplified and modified Rev. Proc. 2002- 33, 2002-1 C.B. 963, by providing additional time for any taxpayer that timely filed its federal income tax return for the taxable year that included September 11, 2001, to, among other things, elect not to deduct the 30-percent additional first year depreciation for a class of property that is qualified property or qualified New York Liberty Zone property placed in service after September 11, 2001, during the taxable year that included September 11, 2001. Section 3.02(2) of Rev. Proc. 2003-50 provides that such a taxpayer will be deemed as making the election not to deduct the 30-percent additional first year depreciation for a class of property that is qualified property or qualified New York Liberty Zone property placed in service by the taxpayer after September 10, 2001, during the taxable year that included September 11, 2001, if the taxpayer, on the federal income tax return for that taxable year, did not claim the 30- percent additional first year depreciation for that class of property but did claim depreciation, and does not file an amended federal tax return (or a qualified amended return) or a Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, within the time and the manner prescribed in section 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2003-50 to claim the 30- percent additional first year depreciation for the class of property for the taxable year that included September 11, 2001.

Based solely on the information provided in Taxpayer=s request, we believe that this request falls under Rev. Proc. 2003-50. Accordingly, we will not rule on Taxpayer=s request.

We have attached a copy of Rev. Proc. 2003-50. We are taking steps to refund Taxpayer=s user fee and it will be returned under separate cover.

In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter to Parent=s and Taxpayer=s authorized representatives. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the appropriate Internal Revenue Service official in the operating division that has examination jurisdiction of Parent=s federal tax returns. If you have any questions regarding this matter, contact ---------------------.

Sincerely yours,

Kathleen Reed

KATHLEEN REED
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Attachment (1) copy of Rev. Proc. 2003-5--

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace