PLR 200351030: Pension plan receives conditional funding waiver

Number
200351030
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
September 24, 2003
Publicly released
December 19, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard for a company's pension plan for the year ending January 31, 2002. The company had reported losses in four of five fiscal years, and the plan's assets covered 89.8 percent of current liabilities at the end of that plan year. The IRS found that applying the funding standard would be adverse to plan participants as a group. To keep the waiver, the company had to make the contributions needed for the next plan year's minimum funding requirement by October 15, 2003. Missing that condition would make the waiver retroactively void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the pension plan receive relief from the minimum funding standard for its 2002 plan year?
  • Outcome: Approved conditionally: the company had to meet the next year's funding requirement by October 15, 2003.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 412(d), (f); ERISA §§ 303, 304.

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00
200351030

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

SEP 24 2003
T:EP:RA:T:A2

In re: [illegible]

This letter constitutes notice that a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard has been granted for the above-named pension plan for the plan year ending January 31, 2002.

This conditional waiver has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The amount for which the conditional waiver has been granted is the contribution that would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account of the plan to zero as of the end of the plan year for which the waiver has been granted.

[illegible] (the “Company”) is the parent of a single subsidiary:
[illegible]. The Company engages primarily in the business of purchasing, processing and reselling [illegible] and also conducts [illegible] operations at
[illegible] including reclamation of [illegible]. The Company has experienced temporary substantial business hardship as evidenced by losses in income in four of the last five fiscal years. According to the information received, the [illegible] and
[illegible] has been in a severe downturn in recent years, and many U.S.
[illegible] companies have filed for bankruptcy. [illegible] are the primary purchaser of
[illegible] and [illegible], which is the primary product of the Company, and the reduction in the number of potential customers has had a further impact on the Company’s financial hardship.

The Company has taken several steps to recover from this hardship. They have reduced costs by making significant reductions in its workforce and closing losing operations. The Company has successfully negotiated additional [illegible] servicing agreements. Additionally, they have entered into an agreement for the sale of real estate that would net approximately $12.75 million for the Company. The Company has received significant non-refundable deposits towards this sale, and the closing is scheduled to occur no later that July 18, 2004. Proceeds from the sale would allow them

200351030

2

to significantly reduce their debt load and free up cash flow for use in its operations in the future. Further, the tariffs recently imposed by the administration on imported [illegible] should strengthen the remaining [illegible] and add to their demand for [illegible] and [illegible] services that are supplied by the Company.

Plan assets as of January 31, 2002, were $4,816,457, and current liabilities were
$5,361,921, with a funding ratio of 89.8%. The Plan had an accumulated funding deficiency for the plan year ended January 31, 2001. According to the information received, the excise taxes associated with this deficiency have been paid.

It has been determined that an application of the minimum funding standard would be adverse to the interests of plan participants in the aggregate. Accordingly, this waiver has been granted subject to the following condition, which you have agreed to:

The Company will make contributions necessary to satisfy the minimum funding requirement (including the waiver amortization payment for the plan year ending January 31, 2002) of the Plan for the plan year ending January 31, 2003 by October 15, 2003.

If the Company fails to meet the above condition, this waiver is retroactively null and void.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304 of ERISA which describes the consequences which result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, to change the rate in the accrual of benefits, or to change the rate of vesting while any portion of the waived amount remains unamortized.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as others as precedent.

When re-filing Form 5500 for the plan year ending January 31, 2002, the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). We have sent a copy of this letter to the EP Classification Manager in [illegible] and to the authorized representatives listed on the power of attorney (Form 2848) on file with this office.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact [illegible]

Sincerely,

[signature]
Martin L. Pippins, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace