PLR 200351026: Closed-end fund receives relief for late dividend election

Number
200351026
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Dividends Paid by Regulated Investment Company After Close of Taxable Year; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 852, § 855, § 4982
Ruling dated
September 15, 2003
Publicly released
December 19, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A closed-end investment fund intended to request more time to file its tax return, but its administrator failed to mail the prepared extension form. The fund later filed its return with a section 855(a) election covering dividends declared and paid after its tax year. The IRS granted relief under the election extension regulations and treated the election as timely made. The ruling covered the election's timing only; it did not remove any late filing penalty or decide whether the fund qualified for regulated investment company treatment. The IRS reserved the question of whether relief would improperly lower the fund's overall tax liability.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the fund's section 855(a) election be treated as timely despite the missed return extension request?
  • Outcome: Approved: the election on the filed return was treated as timely under the extension regulations.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 855(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.855-1(b)(1), 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200351026
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 12/19/2003
Index Nos.: 855.00-00, 9100.00-00 Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:B03 / PLR-120568-03
Date:
SEP 15 2003

In re:

LEGEND

Fund
=

Company
=

Date 1
=

Date 2
=

Date 3
=

Date 4
=

Date 5
=

Date 6
=

Date 7
=

Date 8
=

Date 9
=

Date 10
=

PLR-120568-03
-2-

Date 11
=

Dear

This responds to a letter dated March 20, 2003, submitted on behalf of Fund.
Fund requests that its election under § 855(a) of the Internal Revenue Code to treat dividends distributed after the close of a taxable year as having been paid during that taxable year be considered timely filed pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

FACTS

Fund is a closed-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-1, et seq., as amended. Fund has elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (RIC) under Subchapter M of the Code. Fund files its federal income tax returns on a fiscal year basis with a year end of Date 1. Company serves as the administrator of Fund. Among other duties, Company is responsible for preparing and filing Fund’s federal income tax return, including any extension request.

Fund’s federal income tax return (Form 1120-RIC) for the taxable year ended Date 2, was due on Date 3. Company intended to file a Form 7004 for Fund to obtain an automatic six-month extension of time to file Fund’s federal income tax return. With the filing of the extension request, Fund’s federal income tax return would have been due on Date 4.

On or around Date 2, Company personnel prepared for Fund a Form 7004 for the taxable year ended Date 2, together with a mailing envelope. The form was signed by the Fund’s controller on Date 5, but through inadvertence, the form was not forwarded to the mailroom for delivery to the post office prior to the Date 3 due date. On Date 6, a Company employee discovered the error. Fund was subsequently advised by its public accounting firm to submit a request for relief under § 301.9100-3 that its election under § 855(a) of the Code to treat dividends distributed after the close of a taxable year as having been paid during that taxable year be considered timely filed.

Fund’s Board of Directors declared dividends on Date 7 and Date 8. Fund paid those dividends on Date 9 and Date 10, respectively. The amounts declared for Fund were in accordance with Fund’s policy to distribute any remaining undistributed income and gains necessary to eliminate income and excise taxes under §§ 852 and 4982.

On Date 11, Fund filed its federal income tax return, including the election under § 855(a).

LAW AND ANALYSIS

PLR-120568-03
-3-

Section 855(a) of the Code provides that, if a RIC –

(1) declares a dividend prior to the time prescribed by law for the filing of its return for a taxable year (including the period for any extension of time granted for filing such return), and

(2) distributes the amount of such dividend to shareholders in the 12-month period following the close of such taxable year and not later than the date of the first regular dividend payment made after such declaration, the amount so declared and distributed shall, to the extent the company elects in such return in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary, be considered as having been paid during such taxable year, except as provided in subsections (b), (c) and (d).

Section 1.855-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations sets forth the method of making the election and provides that the election must be made in the return filed by the RIC for the taxable year.

Section 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations provides, in part, that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election (defined in § 301.9100-1(b) as an election whose due date is prescribed by regulations or by a revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an announcement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin), or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-3(a) through (c)(1)(i) set forth rules that the Internal Revenue Service generally will use to determine whether, under the facts and circumstances of each situation, the Commissioner will grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Section 301.9100-3(b) provides that subject to paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (iii) of § 301.9100-3, when a taxpayer applies for relief under this section before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service, the taxpayer will be deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith; and § 301.9100-3(c) provides that the interests of the government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all years to which the regulatory election applies than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).

HOLDING

Based upon the facts presented and representations made by Fund, we hold that Fund has demonstrated good cause for the granting of relief under § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, Fund will be treated as having made a timely election under § 855(a) of the Code on its federal income tax return filed on Date 11 for the Tax Year ended Date 2.

PLR-120568-03
-4-

No opinion is expressed as to whether Fund's tax liability is not lower in the aggregate for the year to which the election applies than Fund's tax liability would have been if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). Upon audit of the federal income tax returns involved, the director will determine Fund's tax liabilities for the year involved. If the director determines that Fund's liability is lower, that office will determine the federal income tax effect.

This ruling is limited to the timeliness of Fund’s election under § 855(a) of the Code. This ruling does not relieve Fund from any penalty that it may owe as a result of its failure to file its federal income tax returns on time. Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied as to any federal excise or income tax consequences regarding Fund. In particular, no opinion is expressed or implied whether Fund qualifies as a RIC that is taxable under subchapter M, part 1 of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely yours,

______
ALICE M. BENNETT
Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate
Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace