TAM 200347023: Abatement advised for private foundation excise taxes

Number
200347023
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Technical Advice Memorandum
IRS subject
Abatement of Private Foundation First Tier Taxes In Certain Cases
Code sections
§ 501, § 4942, § 4943, § 4944, § 4945, § 4962
Ruling dated
June 17, 2003
Publicly released
November 21, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers IRS technical advice on one taxpayer's case, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It answered an IRS office's question about one taxpayer's case on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation owned a for-profit subsidiary holding a hotel and made stock grants to other organizations, relying on counsel's advice. An earlier IRS memorandum found violations involving undistributed income, excess business holdings, jeopardizing investments, and expenditure responsibility for the grants. The foundation had taken corrective action. In this technical advice memorandum, the IRS advised that the initial excise taxes under sections 4942, 4943, 4944, and 4945 should be abated under section 4962 for the stated years. Section 4962 allows abatement of certain first-tier taxes when a taxable event was due to reasonable cause rather than willful neglect and was corrected within the required period.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the foundation's initial excise taxes for the four chapter 42 violations be abated?
  • Outcome: Advice given; the IRS said all four initial taxes should be abated.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 4942, 4943, 4944, 4945, 4962(a).

Full text (IRS public release)

200347023

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
JUN 17 2003 TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM

EO Area Manager:

Taxpayer's Name:
Taxpayer's Address:
Taxpayer's EIN:
Tax Years Involved:

UIL: 501.00-00
4942.00-00
4943.00-00
4944.00-00
4945.00-00
4962.00-00

Legend:
X =

Issues:

  1. Should the initial excise taxes due under section 4942 of the Internal Revenue Code on X's
    undistributed income for the years ending December 31, 1988 through December 31, 1992 be abated under section 4962?

  2. Should the initial excise taxes due under section 4943 on X's excess business holdings for
    the years ending December 31, 1988 through December 31, 1997 be abated under section 4962?

  3. Should the initial excise taxes due under section 4944 on X's jeopardizing investment for the
    years ending December 31, 1988 through December 31, 1997 be abated under section 4962?

  4. Should the initial excise tax due under section 4945 on X's taxable expenditures for the year
    ending December 31, 1988 be abated under section 4962?

Facts:

X is an organization described in 501(c)(3) of the Code. X received an advance ruling as a public charity in 1980, and was reclassified as a private foundation in June 1985.

In 1985, X began construction of a hotel. In 1986, the hotel opened for business, and X placed the hotel in a wholly owned for-profit subsidiary. X relied on the written advice of counsel that its ownership of the subsidiary would not result in a violation of chapter 42 of the Code. In 1993, the Service issued a technical advice memorandum (9340002, June 16, 1993), which determined violations under sections 4942, 4943, and 4944 resulting from the ownership of the subsidiary. X has completed action to correct the chapter 42 violations. 200347023

  • 2 -

In 1988, X made grants of stock to several organizations, also on the advice of counsel. The 1993 technical advice memorandum also held that X failed to exercise its expenditure responsibility requirements in connection with the grants in 1988. The stock produced no dividends in 1988. The situation was corrected in 1989.

Applicable Law:

Section 4962(a) of the Code provides that if it is established to the satisfaction of the Secretary that--

(1) a taxable event was due to reasonable cause and not to willful neglect, and (2) such event was corrected within the correction period for such event,

then any qualified first tier tax imposed with respect to such event (including interest) shall not be assessed and, if assessed, the assessment shall be abated and, if collected, shall be credited or refunded as an overpayment. The section applies to taxable events occurring after December 31, 1984.

H.R. Rep. No. 432 (Pt. 2), 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 1472 (1984), and S. Rep. No. 169 (Vol. 1), 98th Cong., 2d Sess. 591 (1984), indicate the intent of Congress that a chapter 42 violation due to ignorance of the law is not to qualify for abatement under section 4962(a) of the Code.

Delegation Order No. 237 (Rev. 2), updated November 24, 1999, delegates authority to abate substantial first-tier excise taxes to the Director, Exempt Organizations. "Substantial qualified first-tier tax amount" is described as a sum exceeding $200,000 for all such tax payments or deficiencies (excluding interest, other taxes, and penalties) involving all related parties and transactions arising from chapter 42 taxable events within the statute of limitations as determined by the key district office involved. See IRM 1.2.2.137.

Conclusion:

  1. The initial excise taxes due under section 4942 of the Internal Revenue Code on X's
    undistributed income for the years ending December 31, 1988 through December 31, 1992 should be abated under section 4962.

  2. The initial excise taxes due under section 4943 on X's excess business holdings for
    the years ending December 31, 1988 through December 31, 1997 should be abated under section 4962.

  3. The initial excise taxes due under section 4944 on X's jeopardizing investment for the
    years ending December 31, 1988 through December 31, 1997 should be abated under section 4962.

  4. The initial excise tax due under section 4945 on X's taxable expenditures for the year
    200347023

  • 3 -

ending December 31, 1988 should be abated under section 4962.

A copy of this technical advice memorandum is to be given to X. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

-END-

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice addressed one taxpayer's case and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace