PLR 200346002: County insurance pool service provider is a government instrumentality

Number
200346002
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
If Employed in States Where There are Political Subdivisions or Instrumentalities
Code sections
§ 3121, § 3101, § 3111
Ruling dated
August 13, 2003
Publicly released
November 14, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A nonprofit supplied management, claims, and risk prevention services to self-insurance pools created by participating counties. It asked whether it was a government instrumentality for Social Security tax purposes. Applying its six-factor test, the IRS found that the nonprofit performed county functions, was publicly controlled, had no private owners, and depended on county-funded pools. It ruled that the nonprofit was an instrumentality of the counties. Services of employees who qualified as participants in a qualifying state retirement system would therefore be excluded from employment for the specified Social Security taxes. The IRS did not decide whether the state's retirement systems met that requirement.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is the county pool service provider an instrumentality whose qualifying employees' services are excluded from Social Security employment taxes?
  • Outcome: Approved as to instrumentality status; the retirement system qualification was left open.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 3121(b)(7)(F), 3101(a), 3111(a); Rev. Rul. 57-128.

Full text (IRS public release)

8881

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200346002
Release Date: 11/14/2003
Index Number: 3121.02-05

Person To Contact:
------------------------, ID No. ------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET2 PLR-129926-03
Date:
-
August 13, 2003

Legend:

State V =
X
=
Y
=
Z
=

Date A =
Date B =

Dear
:

This is in response to the request for a letter ruling made by your organization’s attorney dated April 30, 2003, as supplemented on July 23, 2003. Your attorney requested a ruling on behalf of Y that Y is an instrumentality of State V (or a political subdivision thereof) within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 3121(b)(7)(F), and consequently is not required to withhold or pay Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance tax under Code sections 3101(a) and 3111(a).

Facts:

Y is a State V non-profit corporation. On Date A, Y received a favorable determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service indicating that it is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(a) of the Code as an organization described in section 501(c)(3).

In accordance with State V law, Y was formed to provide general management, risk management, technical and other services to X which was created by participating state

counties. X was created pursuant to intergovernmental agreements in accordance with State V law in order to provide self-insurance for workers’ compensation, property and casualty risks, and group health benefits for county employees. The self-insurance pools were formed to pool risks and resources in order to lower individual insurance costs of participating counties. Y provides employees to carry out the functions of X. Through these employees, Y provides bookkeeping, accounting, file maintenance, claims review and administration, regulatory compliance, risk management and loss prevention services for X. As part of its risk management and loss prevention services, Y routinely provides consulting services on management and operational issues to participating counties to include: employment practices consultation, review of county policies and practices, review of proposed building plans, salary surveys, and human resource personnel training. These services specifically assist participating counties in minimizing risk and exposure to loss that produce insurance claims resulting in increased cost of operation and depletion of the insurance pools’ loss fund from which claims are paid. By contract, Y provides the same services to Z, another State V governmental self-insurance pool. The employees of Y participate in the Public Employee’s Retirement System of State V. There are no agreements under Section 218 of the Social Security Act in place with respect to Y or X.

The participating counties provide the funding for X, which has no employees, and which is governed by a board of directors appointed by the participating counties. On date B, X obtained a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service indicating that the income of X is excludable from gross income under section 115 of the Code. In the ruling it was determined that the income to X was derived from the exercise of essential government functions. X provides funding to Y with respect to X activities. Risk management and loss prevention services are generally financed on a fee-per- service basis.

Y is governed by a six-member board of directors. Two directors each are appointed by the boards of X. Y’s Bylaws provide that a director must be on a Board of Directors of X to be a director on the board of Y.

Law:

Code section 3121(b)(7)(F) provides that the definition of “employment” includes service in the employ of a State, of any political subdivision thereof, or of any instrumentality of the foregoing, by an individual who is not a member of a retirement system of such State. Section 3121(b)(7)(F) contains five exceptions to this rule, none of which are relevant in this case.

2

Code section 3101(a) imposes a tax on employees for Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance on the income of every individual received by such individual with respect to employment.

Code section 3111(a) imposes a tax on employers for Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance with respect to individuals in his employ paid by him with respect to employment.

In Revenue Ruling 57-128, 1957-1 C.B. 311, the Internal Revenue Service provided six factors to take into consideration in determining whether an organization is an instrumentality of a State or political subdivision for purposes of Code section 3121:

(1) whether it is used for a governmental purpose and performs a governmental function;
(2) whether performance of its function is on behalf of one or more states or political subdivisions;
(3) whether there are any private interests involved, or whether the states or political subdivisions involved have the powers and interests of an owner;
(4) whether control and supervision of the organization is vested in public authority or authorities;
(5) whether express or implied statutory or other authority is necessary or exists for the creation and/or use of the organization; and (6) the degree of financial autonomy and the source of its operating funds.

Analysis:

To determine if Y is an instrumentality within the meaning of Code section 3121(b)(7)(F), Y must be evaluated using the factors of Revenue Ruling 57-128.

  1. Y is used for a governmental purpose and performs a governmental function. State
    V’s Revised Statutes grant authority for public entities to pool insurance coverage by creating self-insurance pools. The bylaws of the Workers’ Compensation Pool provide that the purposes of the pool are to provide a workers’ compensation protected self- insurance pool and to assist members in controlling costs by providing specialized governmental risk management services. The second pool is the Health Pool. The bylaws of the Health Pool provide that the purpose of the pool is to provide members with a means of providing benefits to their employees, including benefit planning, funding, design and administration. The third pool is the Casualty and Property Pool. The bylaws of the Casualty and Property Pool provide that the purposes of the pool are to provide a risk management fund for defined property and casualty coverage and to
                                        3
    

assist members in controlling costs by providing specialized governmental risk management services and systems.

  1. Y performs a governmental function on behalf of the participating counties. The
    State V Constitution recognizes the right of counties to cooperate and contract with each other to provide any function, service, or facility. Y’s Articles of Incorporation provide that Y ‘s primary purpose is to serve State V county governments, “including but not limited to, administrative, management, risk management, loss prevention, technical, and any other service which would or could otherwise be provided by [State V] county or governments.”

  2. There are no private interests involved. Y’s Articles of Incorporation state that Y is
    not organized for profit and will have no capital stock. The articles provide:

          No part of the net earnings of [Y] shall inure to the benefit of or be
          distributable to its directors, officers, or other private persons, except that
          [Y] shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation
          for services rendered and to make payments and distributions in
          furtherance of the purposes set forth in these Article of Incorporation.
    

The participating counties have the powers and interests of an owner. The participating counties provide all of the funding for X, which in turn provides all of the funding for Y. The Articles of Incorporation also provide that Y “may do any and all acts or things which are deemed necessary or proper for carrying out its purposes.” The articles also provide that upon dissolution any assets remaining in Y will be distributed to the participating counties.

  1. Control and supervision of Y is vested in public authorities. Y’s Bylaws provide that
    the business and affairs of Y shall be managed by its Board of Directors. Y’s Articles of Incorporation provide that Y has six directors. Two directors are appointed from and by each Board of Directors of the three organizations that comprise X. The Board of Directors of each of the three organizations that comprise X are appointed by the participating counties. A director may hold office so long as the director continues to serve on the Board of Directors of one of the three organizations that constitute X. The officers of the corporation are elected by Y’s Board of Directors. Y’s Bylaws provide that the president, “subject to the control of the Board of Directors”, will generally supervise and control all of the business and affairs of Y. The bylaws also provide that the Board of Directors of Y will adopt an annual budget and will have an annual audit of its financial affairs by a certified public accountant. A copy of the budget and audit is required to be given to the Boards of Directors of X.

                                          4
    
  2. Y is created pursuant to State V statute. State V Revised Statutes provide that
    counties can enter into a self-insurance pool for workers’ compensation. State V Revised Statutes provide that counties can enter into a self-insurance pool for casualty coverage. State V Revised Statutes provide that counties can enter into a self- insurance pool for property coverage. State V Revised Statutes imply that counties can provide for group heath benefits to their employees as part of their compensation. State V Revised Statutes provide that governments, to include counties, “may cooperate or contract with one another to provide any function, service, or facility lawfully authorized to each of the cooperating or contracting units, including the sharing of costs….” State V Revised Statutes give counties the authority to establish separate legal units to accomplish the agreed to cooperation. Accordingly, State V Revised Statutes provide for the creation of the insurance pools as well as the cooperation of the pools by establishment of a separate legal unit to facilitate the agreed to cooperation.

  3. The major source of Y’s operating expenses with respect to X are from X. The
    funding for X is provided by the participating counties. State V Revised Statutes provide that a county may fund for self-insurance workers’ compensation coverage. State V Revised Statutes provide that a county may fund for self-insurance property coverage. State V Revised Statutes provide that a county may fund for self-insurance casualty coverage. State V Revised Statutes provide that a county may fix compensation and by implication may include a provision for group health benefits. Generally services under the category of risk management and loss prevention are free to the participating counties. However, certain services are rendered on a fee-for- service basis. Thus, Y has no financial autonomy but is dependent on the contributions of X and the participating counties.

Conclusion:

Accordingly, based on the above analysis, we conclude that Y satisfies the criteria of Revenue Ruling 57-128, and is an instrumentality of the counties that participate in X. Inasmuch as the counties that participate in X are political subdivisions of State V, within the meaning of Code section 3121(b)(7)(F), the services performed by Y’s employees who are qualified participants in a retirement system within the meaning of section 3121(b)(7)(F) are excluded from employment for purposes of Code sections 3101(a) and 3111(a). No opinion is expressed on whether the retirement systems of State V constitutes a retirement system within the meaning of section 3121(b)(7)(F).

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer’s representative and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the

5

material submitted in support of the request for a ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Code section 6110(k)(3) provides that this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to Y.

Sincerely,

Lynne Camillo
Chief, Employment Tax Branch 2
Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel
(Exempt Organizations/Employment
Tax/Government Entities)

Cc:

6

7

------------------

--------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------

8

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace