PLR 200344025: Replacement plan reduces pension reversion tax

Number
200344025
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Tax on Reversion of Qualified Plan Assets to Employer
Topics
Code sections
§ 61, § 111, § 401, § 415, § 4980, § 501
Ruling dated
August 6, 2003
Publicly released
October 31, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company proposed to terminate a defined benefit pension plan and transfer part of its surplus to a defined contribution plan before receiving the rest. The IRS ruled that the receiving plan qualified as a replacement plan if it received at least 25 percent of the maximum possible employer reversion. The transfer would neither count as an employer reversion nor enter the company's income, and the company could not deduct it. The amount returned to the company would enter its income and face a 20 percent excise tax rather than 50 percent. The ruling assumed both plans and their trusts retained their qualified and exempt status. The official nine-page PDF appends four pages of a separate ruling, 0344026; only the five pages of this ruling are transcribed here.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the replacement plan and direct transfer reduce the excise tax on the pension plan's surplus reversion?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to the specified transfer and plan qualification assumptions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 61, 401(a), 415, 4980(d)(2), and 501(a).

Full text (IRS public release)

200344025

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

[illegible]

AUG - 6 2003

Index No.: 4980.00-00

Attn.:

Legend:

Company M =
Plan X =
Plan Y =

Dear :

This letter is in response to a request submitted by your authorized representative dated August 15, 2002, as supplemented by letters dated November 21, 2002, July 16, 2003, July 29, 2003, concerning the proper treatment of a reversion from its pension plan under section 4980 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted:

Company M established Plan X, a defined benefit plan, for its employees on January 1, 1956. On December 31, 1992, Company M froze Plan X and, effective January 1, 1993, established Plan Y in order to enhance retirement benefits for its employees. Plan Y is a defined contribution plan with a cash or deferred arrangement as described in section 401(k) of the Code. Participation in Plan Y is offered to all employees of Company M. Both Plan X and Plan Y are qualified plans under section 401(a) and their related trusts are exempt from taxation under section 501(a).

Plan X provided 100 percent vesting for all the participants when it was frozen on December 31, 1992. Since then a majority of the participants took lump sum distributions from Plan X. Currently there are 59 participants receiving monthly benefits from Plan X.

200344025

Plan X’s assets as of January 1, 2002, amounted to approximately $1,500,000. The actuaries estimated that the actuarial present value of future benefits is approximately $570,000. Thus, the asset surplus as of January 1, 2002, was approximately $930,000.

Company M established Plan Y effective January 1, 1993. Under Plan Y, the participants may elect to defer a percentage of their compensation on a pre-tax basis. Company M also makes discretionary profit sharing contributions to Plan Y, which are allocated on behalf of participants based on their respective compensation for the plan year, which is a calendar year. For 2001, Company M contributed approximately
$11,000 to Plan Y.

Company M proposes to terminate Plan X and distribute the vested benefits, including annuity contracts to all participants. Company M proposes to make a direct transfer from Plan X to Plan Y, before any reversion of any excess money is made to Company M. Company M proposes to distribute 25 percent of the surplus to Plan Y or approximately $232,500 and the residual to Company M or approximately $697,500 (which are the January 1, 2002, figures). The actual amount to be transferred to Plan Y will be equal to the excess of:

(a) 25 percent of the maximum amount the employer could receive as an employer reversion without regard to section 4980(d) of the Code, over

(b) an amount equal to the present value of the aggregated increases in the accrued benefits under the terminated plan, Plan X, of any participants or beneficiaries pursuant to a plan amendment adopted during the sixty day period ending on the date of termination and that takes effect immediately on the termination date.

With respect to the contributions to Plan Y, Company M proposes to credit this amount to a suspense account that will be allocated together with the earnings thereof ratably over a period not more than seven years to the account of the participants of Plan Y starting with the year of the reversion. The allocations will be coordinated with the limitations under section 415 of the Code that may apply to certain participants in Plan Y, the replacement plan. The percentage of the active participants in Plan Y who will remain as employees of Company M and who are participating in the replacement plan, Plan Y, is 96.6 percent.

Company M is proposing to pay an excise tax of 20 percent under section 4980 of the Code and will include the residual of the reversion in its taxable income in the year the proposed transaction is effected.

Based on the foregoing, the following rulings are requested:

(1) That Plan Y is a qualified replacement plan of terminated Plan X within the meaning of section 4980(d)(2) of the Code, which would permit Company M

200344025

to use a rate of 20 percent on the amount of the reversion, rather than 50 percent.

(2) That the direct transfer of assets from Plan X to Plan Y is not included in Company M’s income in the year of the plan asset reversion.

(3) That the transfer of 25 percent of the surplus assets directly from the terminated defined benefit pension plan to Plan Y will not be treated as an employer reversion under section 4980 of the Code and will not subject Company M to the excise tax under section 4980.

(4) That Company M will be subject to an excise tax equal to 20 percent, rather than 50 percent of the residual assets to Company M under section 4980 of the Code as a result of the existence of Plan Y.

Section 61 of the Code defines gross income as all income from whatever source derived (subject to certain exceptions). Section 111(a) provides that gross income does not include income attributable to the recovery during the taxable year of any amount deducted in any prior taxable year to the extent that such amount did not reduce the amount of tax imposed by sections 1 through 1400L.

Section 4980(a) of the Code provides for a 20 percent excise tax of the amount of any reversion from a qualified plan. Section 4980(d)(1) provides, in general, that the excise tax under section 4980(a) shall be increased to 50 percent with respect to any employer reversion from a qualified plan unless the employer establishes or maintains a qualified replacement plan, or the plan provides for certain benefit increases which take effect immediately on the termination date.

Section 4980(c)(2)(A) of the Code provides that the term “employer reversion” means the amount of cash and the fair market value of other property received (directly or indirectly) by an employer from the qualified plan.

Section 4980(d)(2) of the Code generally established a two-part test to determine whether a plan is a “qualified replacement plan.” Initially, the plan must be established or maintained by the employer in connection with a qualified plan termination with respect to which at least 95 percent of the active participants in the terminated plan who remain as employees of the employer after the termination are active participants in the replacement plan. Additionally, a direct transfer must be made from the terminated plan to the replacement plan before any “employer reversion” and the transfer must be in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of (1) 25 percent of the maximum amount the employer could receive as an “employer reversion” (determined without regard to section 4980(d)) over (II) the present value of the aggregate increases in the accrued benefits under the terminated plan of any participants or beneficiaries under a plan amendment which is adopted within 60 days before the plan termination and which takes effect immediately upon plan termination.

200344025

Section 4980(d)(2)(B)(iii) of the Code provides that, in the case of any amount transferred under section 4980(d)(2)(b)(i) from a terminated plan to a qualified replacement plan, such amount (I) shall not be included in the gross income of the employer, (II) no deduction shall be allowed with respect to such transfer, and (III) such transfer shall not be treated as an employer reversion for purposes of section 4980.

Section 4980(d)(2)(C)(1) of the Code provides that, if the replacement plan is a defined contribution plan, the amount transferred to the replacement plan must be: (I) allocated under the plan to the accounts of participants in the plan year in which the transfer occurs; or (Il) credited to a suspense account and allocated from such account to accounts of participants no less rapidly than ratably over the seven plan year period beginning with the year of the transfer. Section 4980(d)(4)(B) provides, in part, that the allocation of any amount (or income allocable thereto) to any amounts under section 4980(d)(2)(C) shall be treated as an annual addition for purposes of section 415.

Of the active employees who were participants in Plan X and who are still employed by Company M, it has been represented that 96.6 percent of these employees are active participants in Plan Y and will receive an allocation under Plan Y. Thus, at least 95 percent of the active participants in Plan X who remain as employees of Company M after Plan X’s termination will be active participants in Plan Y.

Under the terms of Plan X, any amount transferred from Plan X into the suspense account in Plan Y will be allocated no less rapidly than ratably over the seven-year-period beginning with the year of the transfer. The allocations will be correlated with the limitations under section 415 of the Code that may apply to certain participants in Plan Y.

The direct transfer from Plan Y to Plan X will be made before any reversion of any excess money is made to Company M. The amount to be transferred to Plan Y will be equal to the excess of

(a) 25 percent of the maximum amount the employer could receive as an employer reversion without regard to section 4980(d) of the Code, over

(b) an amount equal to the present value of the aggregated increases in the accrued benefits under the terminated plan of any participants or beneficiaries pursuant to a plan amendment adopted during the sixty day period ending on the date of termination and that takes effect immediately on the termination date.

Since at least 25 percent of the excess assets remaining after the termination of Plan X will be directly transferred to the trust which holds the Plan Y assets, the requirements of section 4980(d)(2) of the Code will be met with respect to Plan Y. Accordingly, with respect to the first ruling request, we conclude that Plan Y constitutes a qualified replacement plan within the meaning of section 4980(d)(2), provided that an

200344025

amount equal to at least 25 percent of the maximum amount Company M could receive as a reversion is directly transferred from Plan X to Plan Y.

With respect to ruling requests number two, three and four, we conclude that if an amount that is equal to at least 25 percent of the maximum amount which Company M could receive as an employer reversion is directly transferred from Plan X to Plan Y, such amount transferred from Plan X to Plan Y, in accordance with Code section 4980(d)(2)(B)(iii), is not includible in the gross income of Company M, no deduction is allowable with respect to the amount transferred, the amount transferred is not treated as an employer reversion for purposes of section 4980 and will not be subject to the excise tax under section 4980; Company M will be subject to an excise tax equal to 20 percent, rather than 50 percent of the employer reversion because Plan Y is treated as a replacement plan within the meaning of section 4980(d)(2); and the employer reversion received by Company M is subject to the 20 percent excise tax under section 4980(a) and is includible in Company M's gross income under section 61.

These rulings are based on the assumptions that Plan X and Plan Y are qualified under section 401(a) of the Code and that their related trusts are tax-exempt under section 501(a) at all times relevant to this ruling.

No opinion is expressed as to the whether the Code section 401(h) account Company M maintains for its retired employees prior to and subsequent to the termination of Plan X, or whether the funding of such account prior to and subsequent to the termination of Plan Y meets the requirements of Code section 401(h).

This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

If you have any questions, please contact .

We have sent a copy of this letter to your authorized representative pursuant to a Form 2848 (power of attorney) on file with our office.

Sincerely yours,

Joyce E. Floyd, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 2

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter ruling
Form 437

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace