PLR 200343014: Two donors receive late GST allocation relief

Number
200343014
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inclusion Ratio
Code sections
§ 2601, § 2602, § 2611, § 2631, § 2632, § 2641, § 2642
Ruling dated
July 9, 2003
Publicly released
October 24, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two taxpayers made gifts to separate family trusts, but their attorney did not timely advise them to allocate generation-skipping transfer tax exemptions. Gift tax returns eventually allocated the exemptions using the original gift values. The IRS granted each taxpayer 60 days to make supplemental allocations. One allocation covered a gift to the first trust, while the other covered gifts to the second trust in three years. The allocations would take effect on the original transfer dates and use the gift tax values then, although the IRS did not rule on the properties' values.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the two taxpayers allocate GST exemptions late to their earlier trust gifts?
  • Outcome: Approved: both received 60 days to file supplemental Forms 709.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631, 2632, and 2642(b)(1) and (g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200343014
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/24/2003
Index Number: 2642.00-00; 9100.00-00 Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B09-PRL-115101-03
Date:
July 9, 2003

Legend
Date 1
=
Taxpayer 1 =

Trust A =
Taxpayer 2 =

Trust B =
Son
=
Daughter =
Year 1
=
W
=
Year 2
=
Year 3
=
X
=
Y
=
Z
=
Attorney =
Accounting Firm =
Date 2
=
Date 3
=

2
PRL-115101-03

Dear
:

This is in response to your authorized representative’s letter dated May 27, 2003, and prior correspondence, requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make allocations of generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: On Date 1, Taxpayer 1 created Trust A and Taxpayer 2 created Trust B, both irrevocable trusts for the benefit of their family.

Pursuant to Trust A, Section II, until the death of Taxpayer 2, the trustee is to pay to or apply for the benefit of Taxpayer 2, Son and Daughter, and their living children, so much of the net income or principal of the trust estate as the trustee in his discretion, deems necessary for their proper support, maintenance, education, or health. Any undistributed income is to be added to the principal at the end of each year. Upon Taxpayer 2’s death, Trust A terminates and the principal and accumulated income is equally distributed to Son and Daughter. If either child should die prior to the termination of Trust A, that child's share is to be distributed to his or her children, per stirpes.

Trust B, Section II requires net income to be accumulated and added to the principal of the trust estate at the end of each year. Principal may be paid to or applied for the benefit of Son and Daughter, in such amounts as the trustee deems advisable to provide for their support, maintenance, education, or health. Trust B terminates upon the death of the latter of Taxpayer 1 and Taxpayer 2. Upon termination, the principal and accumulated income is to be equally distributed to Son and Daughter. If either child should die prior to the termination of Trust B, that child's share is to be distributed to his or her children, per stirpes.

In Year 1, Taxpayer 1 transferred to Trust A property with a reported value of $W as of the date of the transfer. In Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3, Taxpayer 2 transferred to Trust B property with reported values of $X, $Y, and $Z, respectively, as of the date of the transfers. Taxpayer 1 and Taxpayer 2 hired Attorney to provide estate tax planning, tax compliance, and gift tax return preparation. Attorney, however, failed to timely advise Taxpayer 1 and Taxpayer 2 to allocate their available GST exemptions to the Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 transfers, as applicable. Attorney retained Accounting Firm to prepare Forms 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns for Taxpayer 1 and Taxpayer 2. Accounting Firm, however, was not retained until Date 2. Attorney provided Accounting Firm with the amount and date of the gifts to be reported as well as the amount of GST exemption to allocate on each Form 709. The Forms 709 allocating Taxpayer 1’s GST exemption to her Year 1 transfer and Taxpayer 2’s GST exemption to his Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 transfers were not filed until Date 3. The amount of GST exemption allocated to each transfer was based upon the value of the gift as of the date of the respective transfer rather than the value as of Date 3.

3
PRL-115101-03

Taxpayer 1 and Taxpayer 2 are requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g) and § 301.9100-3 to make allocations of their GST exemptions and that the allocations be effective as of the date of the original transfers.

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation-skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines “applicable rate” as the product of the maximum Federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer. Section 2642(a) provides the method for determining the inclusion ratio.

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation under § 2631(c)) that may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual's estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 26.2632-1(b)(2) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the transferor’s lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709, United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return.

As applicable to transfers made during the years under consideration, § 2642(b)(1) provided that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a timely filed gift tax return or is deemed to be made under § 2632(b)(1) [deemed allocations to certain lifetime direct skips] -

(A) the value of such property for purposes of determining the inclusion ration shall be its value for purposes of chapter 12, and

(B) such allocation shall be effective on and after the date of such transfer.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of § 2642(g)(1), which was enacted into law on June 7, 2001.

4
PRL-115101-03

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time for making the allocation shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-34 I.R.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust as a generation-skipping trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, we grant an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter for Taxpayer 1 to make an allocation of her available GST exemption in respect to the transfer to Trust A in Year 1 and Taxpayer 2 to make allocations of his available GST exemption in respect to the transfers to Trust B in Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3. The allocations will be effective as of the date of the transfers to Trust A and Trust B, and the gift tax value of the transfers will be used in determining the amount of GST exemption to be allocated to each trust.

5
PRL-115101-03

These allocations should be made on supplemental Forms 709 and filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Cincinnati, OH 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to each supplemental Form 709. A copy is enclosed for this purpose.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as specifically ruled herein, we express or imply no opinion on the federal tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code. In addition, we express or imply no opinion regarding the value of the property transferred to the Trust A or Trust B.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace