PLR 200343005: Delayed executive stock purchase leaves earlier rulings intact

Number
200343005
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Spin-Off
Code sections
§ 355, § 368
Ruling dated
July 16, 2003
Publicly released
October 24, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Earlier IRS rulings covered a corporate stock distribution and related transactions, including a plan for senior executives to buy stock in a controlled company. Unexpected developments delayed an executive ownership target by one month because the executives needed bonuses to fund their purchases. The company asked whether that change affected its earlier rulings. The IRS said the facts in this supplemental request had no adverse effect, and the earlier rulings remained in force. It expressed no opinion on matters outside those rulings and this supplement.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the delayed executive stock purchases change the earlier distribution rulings?
  • Outcome: Approved: the earlier rulings remained in force on the stated facts.
  • Key authorities: The original and two supplemental private letter rulings identified in the IRS letter.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200343005
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/24/2003
Index Number: 355.01-00 Person to Contact:
368.04-00
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:4-PLR-117176-03
Date:
July 16, 2003

h
=

Date B =

This letter responds to your February 28, 2003 request that we supplement our letter ruling dated December 16, 1998 (PLR-116429-98)(the “Original Letter Ruling”) and supplemental letter rulings dated June 16, 1999 (PLR-105017-99)(the “First Supplemental Letter Ruling”) and January 30, 2002 (PLR-147187-01)(the “Second Supplemental Letter Ruling”). The Original Letter Ruling, the First Supplemental Letter Ruling and the Second Supplemental Letter Ruling are together referred to herein as the "Prior Letter Rulings." Capitalized terms not defined in this ruling have the meanings assigned to them in Prior Letter Rulings.

The Prior Letter Rulings address certain federal income tax consequences of a distribution of stock of a controlled corporation and related transactions. Step (vii) of the First Supplemental Letter Ruling provided that "[w]ithin a months of the Distribution, the b most senior executives of Business B and Business C will have been issued stock in Controlled 2 representing in the aggregate a greater than c percent interest. Within d months, this interest will rise to greater than e percent. The total cost to the Business B and Business C executives for their Controlled 2 stock will be approximately f dollars."

Distribution 2 was completed on Date A. Since then, unexpected developments have materially impacted Controlled 2's ability to implement its equity incentive plans as originally anticipated.

Consequently, Controlled 2 senior executives exceeded the d-month period to reach the e percent ownership objective by one month because the senior executives needed their bonuses to finance the stock purchase. In addition, the senior executives

PLR-117176-03
2

purchased Controlled 2 stock for h dollars by Date B, and are expected to pay considerably more as they exercise additional stock options that they have been granted.

Based solely on the information submitted with the supplemental ruling request, we rule that the facts set forth herein will have no adverse effect on the rulings contained in the Prior Letter Rulings, which remain in full force and effect.

We express no opinion on the tax treatment of the transaction under any other provisions of the Code or regulations, or the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the transaction that are not specifically covered by the Prior Letter Rulings or this supplemental letter ruling.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer(s) requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to the taxpayer and an additional representative.

Sincerely,

______
Richard K. Passales
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace