PLR 200341016: Unused GST exemption allocates to grandchild trust

Number
200341016
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Allocation of Unused GST Exemption
Code sections
§ 2601, § 2602, § 2611, § 2612, § 2631, § 2632, § 2641, § 2642
Ruling dated
July 2, 2003
Publicly released
October 10, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A decedent's will created a trust intended to use his available generation-skipping transfer tax exemption and a separate residuary trust for his daughter. The estate asked whether the unused exemption would automatically go to the first trust under IRC § 2632(e). The IRS concluded that the entire unused exemption was automatically allocated to that trust when the estate tax return was due, giving it an inclusion ratio of zero. No exemption was automatically allocated to the residuary trust because the daughter would become its new transferor before any generation-skipping transfer could occur from it. The ruling rests on the estate's representations and the terms of the will described in the letter.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the decedent's unused GST exemption automatically allocate to the GST trust rather than the residuary trust?
  • Outcome: Approved; the GST trust receives the unused exemption and has a zero inclusion ratio.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2632(e) and 2642(a); Treas. Reg. § 26.2632-1(d)(2).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200341016
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/10/2003
Index Number: 2632.03-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B09-PLR-103727-03
Date:
July 2, 2003
In Re:

LEGEND

Decedent
=

Date 1
=

Daughter
=

$x
=

Dear . :

This letter responds to your letter, dated January 7, 2003, and subsequent correspondence, requesting a generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax ruling under
§ 2632 of the Internal Revenue Code.

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: Decedent died testate on Date 1, survived by Daughter. Decedent’s spouse predeceased him.

After certain specific bequests, the residuary estate is disposed of in accordance with Article Nine of Decedent’s will.

Article Nine, Paragraph D, subparagraph 1(b)(i) of Decedent’s will provides that if Decedent’s Spouse predeceases him, the named trustees are to set aside in the “GST Trust” the amount of Decedent’s available GST exemption, such that the trust will have an inclusion ratio of zero for GST tax purposes. The terms of the GST Trust provide that the trustee shall distribute all net income to Daughter for her lifetime, together with the amounts of principal as necessary for her maintenance, health, education, and support. Upon the death of Daughter, the balance of the GST Trust principal shall be distributed in accordance with the provisions of Article Nine, Paragraph D, subparagraph (1)(b)(iii).

2
PLR-103727-03

Article Nine, Paragraph D, subparagraph 1(b)(ii) of Decedent’s will provides that after the funding of the GST Trust, the balance of the residuary estate shall be held in the “Residuary Trust.” The terms of the Residuary Trust provide that the trustee shall distribute all net income to Daughter for her lifetime, together with the amounts of principal as necessary for her maintenance, health, education, and support. Upon her death, the balance of the Residuary Trust is to be paid to the appointees the Daughter may by her Last Will and Testament select, by specific reference to the general power of appointment hereunder created. Any assets not so appointed shall be distributed in accordance with the provisions of Article Nine, Paragraph D, subparagraph (1)(b)(iii).

Article Nine, Paragraph D, subparagraph (1)(b)(iii) of Decedent’s will provides that upon the death of Daughter, the trustee shall divide any assets to be distributed under Article Nine, Paragraph D, subparagraph (1)(b)(iii), into a sufficient number of separate and equal shares so that there shall be one share for each of Decedent’s grandchildren then living, and one share for the then living issue of any deceased grandchild of Decedent. Each share shall be held in trust for the grandchild, or living issue of a deceased grandchild, and income therefrom shall be paid to or applied for the benefit of the beneficiary or beneficiaries of the trust, together with the amounts of principal as are necessary for the health, education, support, and maintenance of the trust’s beneficiary or beneficiaries.

Article Nine, Paragraph D, subparagraph (1)(e) of Decedent’s will provides that after the death of Daughter, each of Decedent’s grandchildren will have the right to withdraw portions of the principal of his or her trust as he or she reach ages thirty and thirty-five. When each of Decedent’s grandchildren reach age forty, he or she will have the right to withdraw all of the remaining principal of his or her trust.

Article Nine, Paragraph D, subparagraph (1)(f) of Decedent’s will provides that if a separate share becomes payable to the living issue of any deceased grandchild, the share shall be paid outright to the living issue of the deceased grandchild, except for the portion of the share payable to an issue who is less than twenty-one years of age. In that case, the portion shall be held in trust until such issue reaches the age of twenty- one and will be distributed outright at that time.

The executor of Decedent’s estate timely filed the estate’s United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return (Form 706). Decedent’s estate represents that Decedent’s entire $1,000,000 GST exemption was available for allocation at Decedent’s death. In accordance with Decedent’s will, the GST Trust is to be funded with $x, the amount of Decedent’s unused GST exemption, and the Residuary Trust is to be funded with the balance of the residuary estate.

Decedent’s estate requests that we rule that the automatic allocation rules of § 2632(e) operate to cause the unused portion of Decedent’s GST exemption to be allocated to the GST Trust so that the trust has an inclusion ratio of zero.

3
PLR-103727-03

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2612(a)(1) provides, generally, that the term “taxable termination” means the termination (by death, lapse of time, release of power, or otherwise) of an interest in property held in a trust where the property passes to a skip person with respect to the transferor of the property. Section 2612(b) provides that the term “taxable distribution” means any distribution from a trust to a skip person other than a taxable termination or a direct skip. Section 2612(c)(1) provides that a “direct skip” is a transfer subject to federal estate or gift tax made by a transferor to a skip person.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of tax imposed by § 2601 is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines “applicable rate” as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

Under § 2642(a)(1), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a GST is, generally, the excess of 1 over the applicable fraction determined for the trust from which the transfer is made, or in the case of a direct skip, the applicable fraction determined for such skip. The applicable fraction, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption allocated to the trust (or in the case of a direct skip, allocated to the property transferred in such skip), and the denominator of which is the value of the property transferred to the trust (or involved in the direct skip).

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation under
§ 2631(c)) which may be allocated by the individual (or by his or her executor) to any property with respect to which the individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that once an allocation of GST exemption is made, it is irrevocable.

Under § 2632(a), the allocation of the GST exemption may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the individual’s estate tax return (including extensions).

Section 2632(e)(1) (designated as § 2632(c)(1) at the time of Decedent’s death) provides that, in general, any portion of an individual’s GST exemption that has not been allocated within the time prescribed by § 2632(a) shall be deemed to be allocated as follows–

(A) first, to property which is the subject of a direct skip occurring at the individual’s death, and
(B) second, to trusts with respect to which the individual is the transferor and from which a taxable distribution or a taxable termination might occur at or after the individual’s death.

4
PLR-103727-03

Section 26.2632-1(d)(2) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations provides that a decedent’s unused GST exemption is automatically allocated on the due date for filing Form 706 to the extent not otherwise allocated by the decedent’s executor on or before that date. The regulation also supplies the method for the automatic allocation of any unused GST exemption. First, the exemption is allocated pro rata to direct skips on the basis of estate tax values. The balance is then allocated pro rata, on the basis of estate tax values, to trusts with respect to which a taxable termination may occur or from which a taxable distribution may be made. No automatic allocation is made to a trust that will have a new transferor with respect to the entire trust prior to the occurrence of any GST with respect to the trust. The automatic allocation is irrevocable.

With regard to the specific bequests made in Decedent’s will, no direct skips occurred in their distribution. During the life of Daughter, there is no possibility of a GST occurring with respect to any distribution from the Residuary Trust because the income and principal of the Residuary Trust can only be distributed to Daughter, a non-skip person. Following the death of Daughter, the assets of the Residuary Trust will pass pursuant to the exercise or lapse of Daughter’s testamentary general power of appointment and Daughter will be considered the transferor of such assets. With regard to the assets of the GST Trust, no GSTs will occur during the Daughter’s lifetime, but one or more taxable terminations may occur upon the death of Daughter.

Based on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that on the due date for filing Decedent’s Form 706, the entire amount of Decedent’s unused GST exemption is to be automatically allocated to the GST Trust. No automatic allocation is made to the Residuary Trust because it will have a new transferor with respect to the entire trust prior to the occurrence of any GST with respect to the trust. The amount of the GST exemption automatically allocated to the GST Trust will equal the value of the property transferred to the trust, resulting in an inclusion ratio of zero under § 2642(a).

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as specifically ruled herein, we express no opinion on the federal tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

5
PLR-103727-03

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to the taxpayer.

Sincerely,

James F. Hogan

James F. Hogan
Senior Technician Reviewer
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosure
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace