PLR 200339008: Supplemental ruling narrows a conversion caveat

Number
200339008
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Material Change in Operations Existing Blue Cross or Blue Shield Organizations
Topics
Code sections
§ 833
Ruling dated
June 10, 2003
Publicly released
September 26, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer requested a change to one caveat in an earlier ruling about a corporate conversion. The IRS retained its statement that it expressed no opinion under IRC § 833, including whether the conversion was a material change under § 833(c). It narrowed the following sentence so that, if the conversion was a material change, the IRS expressed no opinion on its effect on the parent companies' asset bases, earnings and profits, or accounting methods. This supplemental letter incorporates the earlier ruling by reference but does not reproduce its analysis.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will the IRS modify the § 833 material-change caveat in its earlier ruling?
  • Outcome: Approved: the caveat's final sentence was replaced.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 833(c); the earlier ruling incorporated by reference.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200339008
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 09/26/03
Index Number: 0368.05-00
Person to Contact:
1502.75-10
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:DOM:CORP:1-PLR-130487-03
Date:
June 10, 2003

Re:

Parent
=

Holding Company =

Foundation =

Business L =

State X
=

y
=

Dear

This letter responds to a letter dated April 9, 2003, requesting a supplemental letter ruling with respect to our prior letter ruling (PLR-155976-01) dated February 12, 2002 ( the ”Prior Letter Ruling”). The entire text of the Prior Letter Ruling is hereby incorporated by reference, except as modified below, for purposes of this supplemental letter ruling.

PLR-130487-03
2

The Prior Letter Ruling contained the following caveat:

Furthermore, we express no opinion with respect to § 833 of the Code, including whether the Conversion constitutes a material change within the meaning of § 833(c). If the Conversion constitutes such a material change, we express no opinion on its effect on the above rulings.

You have requested that we modify the last sentence of this caveat.

Accordingly, the last sentence of this caveat in the Prior Letter Ruling is hereby modified to read as follows:

If the Conversion constitutes such a material change, we express no opinions on its effect on Parent and Parent Holding Company’s bases in their assets, their earnings and profits, or their accounting methods.

Each affected taxpayer must attach a copy of this letter to the taxpayer’s federal income tax return for the taxable year in which the transaction covered by this letter ruling is consummated.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to the taxpayer.

Sincerely yours,

Michael J. Wilder
Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace