PLR 200338017: Nonprofit health system receives a minimum funding waiver for its pension plan

Number
200338017
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Standards
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
June 23, 2003
Publicly released
September 19, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A nonprofit health system requested relief from the minimum funding requirement for its money purchase pension plan for the year ended December 31, 2001. The IRS granted a waiver under section 412(d) for the contribution needed to bring the plan's funding standard account to zero. The sponsor's losses and cash flow problems followed a managed care contract, and the IRS described the hardship as temporary. The letter says the waived deficiency must be amortized over five years and the plan must be amended to reflect the waiver unless it already provides for one.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the pension plan receive a minimum funding waiver for its 2001 plan year?
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d), 412(b)(2)(C), 412(f); ERISA § 303; Rev. Rul. 78-233.

Full text (IRS public release)

200338017

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUN 23 2003

[illegible]

In re:

Dear

This letter constitutes notice that with respect to the above-named money purchase pension plan we have granted a waiver for the plan year ended December 31, 2001.

This waiver for the plan year ended December 31, 2001 has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The waived amount is the contribution which would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the

funding standard account to zero as of the end of the plan year for which this waiver has been granted.

The Plan sponsor is a nonprofit corporation, which operates healthcare systems and facilities. The business hardship experienced by the sponsor primarily resulted from a managed care contract entered into between a subsidiary hospital owned by the sponsor and PacifiCare, which caused the hospital to incur net losses during the first two years of the contract. The contract was terminated in June 1999, effective January 1, 2000, and was replaced by a fee-for-service contract. The new contract reversed the losses that the hospital had suffered, but the shift from the prepayment system to the fee-for-service system resulted in cash flow problems. Furthermore,

the physician’s group incurred additional losses because it was unable to cancel its contract with PacifiCare until March 31, 2001.

The business hardship appears to be temporary and related to the contract with PacifiCare. Additionally, the company has reviewed all of its billing and data

processing and procedures and many changes have been made to insure that the company receives correct reimbursement.

When a defined contribution plan receives a waiver of the minimum funding requirements, the plan, in accordance with Rev. Rul. 78-233, 1978-1 C.B. 125, must

be amended to reflect the waiver if the plan does not otherwise provide for such waiver

200338017

Your attention is called to the following:

(1) Section 412(f) of the Code describes the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized.

(2) Section 412(d) of the Code provides that the amortization charge described in Section 412(b)(2)(C) must be computed by using an interest rate as described in Section 412(d)(1).

(3) Section 412(b)(2)(C) of the Code, as amended by Section 9307(a)(1) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, requires that, for plan years beginning after December 31, 1987, each waived funding deficiency must be amortized by equal annual installments over a period of 5 years. This provision is applicable to an amortization base established in a plan year beginning after December 31, 1987, as in this case for the waiver granted for the plan year ending December 31, 2001.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

In accordance with the instructions to Form 5500, a Schedule B (Actuarial Information) must be filed for each plan year for which a waiver is being amortized (see line 5 of Schedule R [Retirement Plan Information]). Schedule B should be filed for this plan; accordingly, when filing Form 5500 for the plan year ending December 31, 2002, the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (see line 8a). For this reason we suggest that you furnish a copy of this letter to the individual who is responsible for the completion of the Schedule B, who does no have to be an enrolled actuary in this case.

200338017

A copy of this letter is being sent to the Manager, Employee Plans Classification in

A copy of this letter should be furnished to the enrolled actuary for the plan.

If you have any questions on this ruling letter, please contact

  • Sincerely,

LD

Norman Greenberg
Manager, Actuarial Group 1

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace