PLR 200330040: Extension granted for dual consolidated loss elections
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer missed several elections, agreements, and annual certifications related to dual consolidated losses. It said its tax professionals had failed to advise it to make the filings, and it sought relief before the IRS discovered the omissions. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the regulatory standard for a good faith request that would not prejudice the government. It granted 30 days from the ruling date to make the listed filings. The letter expressly did not determine whether the taxpayer otherwise qualified to make them.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the taxpayer receive more time to make the listed dual consolidated loss filings?
- Outcome: Approved; a 30-day extension was granted.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3, 1.1503-2.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200330040
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 7/25/2003
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
9100.18-00
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-116141-02
Date:
April 28, 2003
In re:
LEGEND
Taxpayer
=
Individual A
=
Dear
:
This replies to your letter dated March 13, 2002, requesting that Taxpayer be granted an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the following elections: (1) the agreement described in § 1.1503-2A(c)(3) in accordance with Schedule A; (2) to replace the agreements filed under § 1.1503-2A(c)(3) in accordance with Schedule A with the election and agreement described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), pursuant to the transitional rule described in § 1.1503-2(h)(2)(ii), in accordance with Schedule B; (3) the election and agreement described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) in accordance with Schedule C; and (4) the annual certification described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) in accordance with Schedule D. Schedules A, B, C and D are made a part of this ruling letter. Additional information was submitted on September 10, 2002, and April 8, 2003. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process. Individual A was employed in the tax department of Taxpayer during the tax years at 2
In re: PLR-116141-02
issue. The affidavit of Individual A and the facts submitted describe the circumstances that led to the discovery of and reasons for Taxpayer’s failure to file the elections which are the subject of this request. The affidavit and facts indicate that Taxpayer relied on its tax professionals to advise it as to all necessary elections and its tax professionals failed to advise Taxpayer to make these elections. Taxpayer is requesting relief before its failure to file the elections has been discovered by the Service.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
In the present situation, the elections and agreements and the annual certifications are regulatory elections as defined in § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).
Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the following elections: (1) the agreement described in § 1.1503-2A(c)(3) in accordance with Schedule A; (2) to replace the agreements filed under § 1.1503-2A(c)(3) in accordance with Schedule A with the election and agreement described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), pursuant to the transitional rule described in § 1.1503-2(h)(2)(ii), in accordance with Schedule B; (3) the election and agreement described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) in accordance with Schedule C; and (4) the annual certification described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) in accordance with Schedule D.
The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the elections and agreements and the annual certifications. § 301.9100- 1(a). 3
In re: PLR-116141-02
A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the elections and agreements and the annual certifications.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Associate Chief Counsel (International)
By: /s/ Allen Goldstein
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Enclosures:
Schedules A, B, C, D
Copy for § 6110 purposes
4
In re: PLR-116141-02
SCHEDULE A
An extension of time is requested to file the agreement described in § 1.1503- 2A(c)(3) with respect to the dual consolidated losses of each entity listed below
incurred in the tax year ended on
, with the tax return filed for the
tax year ended on
.
ENTITY
IDENTIFICATION
NUMBER
SCHEDULE B
An extension of time is requested to replace the agreements filed under § 1.1503-2 A(c)(3) in accordance with Schedule A above with agreements described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), under the transitional rule provided in § 1.1503-2(h)(2)(ii), with the tax return filed for the tax year ended on
.
SCHEDULE C
An extension of time is requested to file the election and agreement described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to the dual consolidated losses of each entity listed below incurred in the tax years ended as indicated.
NAME OF ENTITY IDENTIFICATION TAX YEARS
NUMBER
ENDED
5
In re: PLR-116141-02
SCHEDULE D
An extension of time is requested to file the annual certification described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) with respect to the dual consolidated losses of as follows: (1) with the tax return filed for the tax year ended on the dual consolidated losses incurred in the tax year ended on ; (2) with the tax return filed for the tax year ended on , the dual consolidated losses incurred in each of the tax years ended
on and .
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace