PLR 200328037: Conditional 2002 pension funding waiver granted

Number
200328037
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
April 14, 2003
Publicly released
July 11, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company facing losses and reduced liquidity asked for a waiver of its defined benefit pension plan's minimum funding standard for the 2002 plan year. The IRS granted a conditional waiver of the contribution needed to reduce the plan's funding standard account balance to zero. The company had 90 days from the letter date to execute documents for an arrangement satisfactory to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation to secure repayment. Failure to meet that condition would void the waiver retroactively. The letter also points to restrictions on benefit increases while the waived amount remains unamortized.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the company receive a waiver of its 2002 pension minimum funding requirement?
  • Outcome: Approved subject to a repayment-security condition.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d), 412(f); ERISA §§ 303, 304.

Full text (IRS public release)

200328037

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00 Third Party Contacts - Employees of the

Company (Nov. 2002 — Dec. 2002)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

APR 14 2003
T:EP:RA:T:A2

In re:
EIN:
Company =

Dear

This letter constitutes notice that a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard has been granted for the above-named pension plan for the plan year beginning January 1, 2002.

The conditional waiver has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The amount for which the waiver has been granted is the contribution that would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account of the plan to zero as of the end of the plan year for which the waiver has been granted.

The Company, formerly operated as a division of another [redacted], purchased its major operating assets from the [redacted] in 1984 through a leveraged employee stock ownership plan [redacted] transaction. Through the
[redacted], the Company was employee owned until 1989, when the Company's stock began trading publicly. The Company is a major integrated producer of
[redacted], with principal product lines consisting of [redacted] and [redacted]. In recent years, the U.S. [redacted] has been in a state of crisis characterized by record operating losses, more than two dozen bankruptcies, and the permanent closure of a significant amount of productive capacity. During this time the Company, like most U.S. integrated producers, has sustained significant operating losses and decreased liquidity as a result of adverse market conditions resulting from a slowing economy, depressed product selling prices, and high levels of foreign imports. The

200328037

Company experienced net losses for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2000 through 2002, and reported both negative working capital and negative net worth for the fiscal years 2001 and 2002.

The Company commenced a restructuring in the spring of 2001 to fundamentally reposition its business to focus on higher margin value-added products. The restructuring included reductions in workforce, streamlining management, entering into financing programs with vendors to improve liquidity, increasing liquidity and borrowing availability by refinancing the Company's working capital facilities through a senior credit facility, restructuring long-term debt, and lowering debt service costs.

As part of its recovery efforts the Company has secured concessions from its bargaining unit employees, including cancellation of a planned $1 per hour wage increase that would have gone into effect in April 2003, an immediate 5 percent pay and wage reduction, a six-month postponement of 50 percent of vacation pay that would have been payable to certain employees in February 2003, and freezing of Plan benefit accruals, intended to become effective on or about April 30, 2003. The same pay reduction and Plan freeze will also be applicable on the same dates to all of the Company’s salaried employees. The Company plans to reposition its business by pursuing the acquisition of strategic assets

from other [redacted] that are working to reposition their business, and pursuing other asset acquisitions that meet the Company's goal of exiting the [redacted]. The Company expects its proprietary technology to
[redacted] with a polymer film to be a major source of growth. The Company has substantial obligations related to its employee post-retirement plans for medical and life insurance benefits and pensions. The Company has stated that it is currently holding meetings with its pre-age 65 retirees to discuss significant reductions in future health care costs.

The above-named defined benefit Plan was originally effective [redacted]. Plan contributions for the plan years [redacted] exceeded the minimum funding requirement for those years, and the resulting large credit balances in the funding standard account were sufficient to meet minimum funding requirements for the
[redacted] plan years. The minimum funding requirement for the 2002 plan year includes approximately [redacted] for an additional funding charge. As of January 1, 2002, the ratio of market value of assets to accrued liability is approximately [redacted] percent. The 2002 actuarial report for the Plan gives investment losses and the retirement of nearly [redacted] participants with enhanced benefits in 2001 and early 2002, as a result of corporate restructuring, as primary causes of decreases in the Plan’s funded status.

200328037

This waiver has been granted subject to the following condition, which you have agreed to:

Within 90 days from the date of this letter, all necessary documents to provide an arrangement to secure the repayment of the waived amount satisfactory to the PBGC will be executed.

If the Company fails to meet the above condition, this waiver is retroactively null and void.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304 of ERISA which describes the consequences which result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, to change the rate in the accrual of benefits, or to change the rate of vesting while any portion of the waived amount remains unamortized.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year ending December 31, 2002, the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). We have sent a copy of this letter to the [redacted] and to your authorized representatives (Form 2848) on file with this office. If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact
[redacted]. In any correspondence
relating to this letter, please refer to [redacted] as well.

Sincerely,

[signature]

Carol D. Gold, Director
Employee Plans

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace