PLR 200323043: Pension funding waiver granted with payment conditions

Number
200323043
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
March 13, 2003
Publicly released
June 6, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A manufacturer sought relief from the minimum funding standard for its defined benefit pension plan for the plan year beginning July 23, 2001. The company reported losses during a decline in commercial construction and said it expected its finances to improve. The IRS granted a conditional waiver under section 412(d), requiring a $15,000 contribution by April 7, 2003, and the contributions needed to satisfy the following plan year's minimum funding requirement by April 7, 2004. The waiver would be void retroactively if the company missed either condition. The IRS also warned about restrictions on increasing benefits while the waived amount remained unamortized.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the plan receive a minimum-funding waiver for its 2001 plan year?
  • Outcome: Approved conditionally, with contribution deadlines in 2003 and 2004.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d), 412(f); ERISA §§ 303, 304.

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00
200323043

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

MAR 13 2003

In re:
Dear

This letter constitutes notice that a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard has been granted for the above-named pension plan for the plan year beginning July 23, 2001.

This conditional waiver has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The amount for which the conditional waiver has been granted is the contribution that would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account of the plan to zero as of the end of the plan year for which the waiver has been granted (after the payment of the amount required under section 412(b)(2)(C) of the Code to amortize any waivers for prior plan years and the payment required in condition (2) below).

(the “Company”), founded in 1947, is a manufacturer of products used in the building industry. The majority of the production is custom commercial work manufactured under signed contracts. The Company is located in and its primary sales region includes

The Company adopted the
Defined Benefit Retirement Plan for Hourly Employees of on July 23, 1975. The Plan covers a total of 87 participants, 35 active and 52 inactive.

The Company has experienced significant losses due to declining sales resulting from the current recession. The Company has also been severely affected by the lack of orders following September 11th. Losses for 2001 and 2000 were $1.19 million and $1.2 million respectively. For the eight months ended August 31, 2002, the year-to-date loss was approximately $239,000. This represents a significant improvement over recent years.

200323043

2

The Company has focused on cutting expenses, which includes all benefit accruals under the Plan being frozen as of May 31, 1998. Due to the cyclical nature of the commercial construction industry, the Company's prospects for recovery from this temporary business hardship are significantly affected by the overall condition of the economy. As the economy recovers from the current recession, the Company’s expectation is that their financial situation would also improve. The Company is currently projecting a profit for 2003.

This waiver has been granted subject to the following conditions, which you have agreed to:

(1) The Company will make contributions necessary to satisfy the minimum funding requirement (including the waiver amortization payments for the plan years beginning July 23, 2000 and 2001) of the Plan for the plan year beginning July 23, 2002, by April 7, 2004.

(2) In addition to the waiver amortization payment for the plan year beginning July 23, 2000, the Company will make a $15,000 contribution to the Plan by April 7, 2003, to be credited to the plan year beginning July 23, 2001.

If the Company fails to meet the above conditions, this waiver is retroactively null and void.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304 of ERISA which describes the consequences which result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, to change the rate in the accrual of benefits, or to change the rate of vesting while any portion of the waived amount remains unamortized.

This ruling is directed only to the organization that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year beginning July 23, 2001, the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). We have sent a copy of this letter to the Area Manager in

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact

Sincerely,

(signed) Martin L. Pippins

Martin L. Pippins, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace