PLR 200323033: Affiliates get more time to file branch profits tax waivers

Number
200323033
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Branch Tax
Code sections
§ 884
Ruling dated
February 25, 2003
Publicly released
June 6, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two affiliated corporations believed, based on a tax adviser's advice, that they owed no branch profits tax for a tax year. They did not use the complete-termination rule or file waivers extending the period for assessing that tax. The IRS granted them 30 days from the letter date to file the waivers under the section 884 regulations. The letter did not decide whether the corporations were otherwise eligible to file the waivers or met the complete-termination requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporations file their branch profits tax assessment waivers after the deadline?
  • Outcome: Approved a 30-day extension to file the waivers.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.884-2T(a)(2)(i)(D), 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200323033
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 6/6/2003
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
884.00-00
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-105101-02
Date:
February 25, 2003

LEGEND

Parent
=

Corp A
=

Corp B
=

Year X
=

Year Y
=

Individual A
=

Tax Advisor
=

CPA Firm
=

2

PLR-105101-02
______________

Dear

This replies to a letter dated January 3, 2002 in which Parent, Corp A and Corp B (sometimes collectively referred to as the Taxpayers) request an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file a waiver provided under § 1.884-2T(a)(2)(i)(D) extending the period for assessment of the branch profits tax for each of Corp A and Corp B for year X until a date not earlier than the last day of year Y. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

Parent is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations that included at the end of year X Corp A and Corp B. Corp A and Corp B were owned by a member of Parent’s affiliated group.

Individual A is the assistant vice president of taxes at Parent. Tax Advisor is a tax partner in CPA Firm. The affidavits of Individuals A and Tax Advisor and the facts submitted show that Corp A and Corp B each believed that it did not have a branch profits tax for year X. This belief was based on the advice of Tax Advisor. Consequently, neither Corp A or Corp B availed itself of the complete termination rule of
§ 1.884-2T, nor filed a waiver for year X as provided under § 1.884-2T(a)(2)(i)(D).

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

3

PLR-105101-02
______________
In the present situation, § 1.884-2T(a)(2)(i)(D) fixes the time to file the waiver. Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayers an extension of time, provided that Taxpayers satisfy the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the facts and the representations submitted, we conclude that Taxpayers satisfy § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayers are granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the waivers as provided under
§ 1.884-2T(a)(2)(i)(D) extending the period for assessment of the branch profits tax of Corp A and Corp B for year X until a date not earlier than the last day of year Y. The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayers are otherwise eligible to file the waivers. § 301.9100-1(a).

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented. In particular, no opinion is expressed as to whether Taxpayers have satisfied the requirement for complete termination under §1.884-2T(a)(2).

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with Taxpayers’ tax return for year X.

This ruling letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

/s/ Allen Goldstein______
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

Enclosures
Copy for 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace