PLR 200321026: Minimum funding waiver granted to pension plan

Number
200321026
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
February 27, 2003
Publicly released
May 23, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a waiver of the minimum funding standard for a defined benefit pension plan's year ended January 31, 2002. The company reported declining sales from 1999 to 2001 and cuts to salary and hourly payroll costs. The letter states that plan assets equaled 70 percent of current liability as of February 1, 2002. The waived amount was the contribution otherwise needed to bring the funding standard account to zero for that plan year. The IRS also warned that increasing benefits, accruals, vesting, or liabilities under other company plans while the waived deficiency remained unamortized could have consequences under section 412(f) and ERISA.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Would the IRS waive the plan's minimum funding standard for the stated plan year?
  • Outcome: Approved the funding waiver under section 412(d).
  • Key authorities: IRC § 412(d), (f); ERISA §§ 303, 304(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00
200321026

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

FEB 27 2003

[illegible handwritten notation]

In re:

Dear

This letter constitutes notice that with respect to the above-named defined benefit pension plan we have granted a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ended January 31, 2002.

This waiver for the plan year ended January 31, 2002, has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The waived amount is the contribution which would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account to zero as of the end of the plan year for which this waiver has been granted.

The company has a calendar year fiscal year. The Company sales have steadily declined from 1999 to 2001. The Company has reduced salary costs, and reduced hourly payroll costs. The company has also received a certification that will allow it to be more competitive.

As of February 1, 2002, the value of the assets of the plan was equal to 70% of the plan's current liability,

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA which describe the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized. Please note that any amendment to other retirement plans maintained by the company or to the company’s profit sharing plan, to increase the liabilities of those plans would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA.

200321026
2

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year ended December 31, 2001, the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). A copy of this letter is being sent to the Manager, Employee Plans Classification in

A copy of this letter should be furnished to the enrolled actuary for the plan.

If you have any questions on this ruling letter, please contact

Sincerely,

Norman Greenberg
Acting Manager, Actuarial Group 1

cc: Manager, Employee Plans Classification

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace