PLR 200318051: Duty injury and survivor benefits excluded from income

Number
200318051
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Workmen's Compensation
Code sections
§ 104, § 213
Ruling dated
January 23, 2003
Publicly released
May 2, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A state fund paid disability benefits to employees injured in the course of duty and survivor benefits after an employee died from a duty related injury or illness. The IRS found that the described state provisions were in the nature of workers' compensation laws. It ruled that disability reimbursements and benefits under two provisions, catastrophic injury benefits under two others, and survivor benefits under a fifth were excluded from recipients' gross income under § 104(a)(1). The conclusion depended on the benefits being limited to work related injuries or deaths. The letter did not address other tax rules that might apply to the benefits.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are the fund's described duty injury and survivor payments excluded from recipients' income?
  • Outcome: Approved for the specified benefits.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 104(a)(1); Treas. Reg. § 1.104-1(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Number: 200318051
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 5/2/2003
Index Number: 104.02-00 Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:TE/GE:EB:HW - PLR-150698-02
Date:
January 23, 2003
Legend

Taxpayer =

Fund =

Statute A =

Statute B =

Statute C =

Statute D =

Statute E =
2

Dear
:

This responds to your request of September 9, 2002, on behalf of the Taxpayer, concerning the Federal income tax treatment under section 104 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) of certain benefits paid under the Fund.

The Fund was created by the State Legislature to establish, operate, and make contributions for the payment of benefits to disabled employees and to the qualified survivors of deceased employees. The Fund is further authorized by State statute to establish disability expense reimbursements and disability pensions for employees who incur a disability in the line of duty and for the payment of benefits to dependent parents, surviving spouses, and dependent unmarried children of employees who die in the line of duty

Statute A provides that in the event an Employee who is participating in [Statute A] incurs a disability through the performance of duty, the Employee or Employee's beneficiary or estate shall be entitled to receive from the Fund reimbursement for all travel, medical, surgical, and hospital expense directly resulting from such disability incurred before the Employee's death.

In addition, the Employee shall be entitled to receive monthly payments from the Fund. The amount of monthly disability payment shall be determined in accordance with the extent of disability. Disability payments shall be based on the possibility of twenty (20) Years of Service and on a maximum of one-half (½) of the average monthly salary received, or to be received, during the highest paid consecutive twelve (12) months, plus twenty dollars ($20). In the event an Employee shall become totally disabled in the performance of duty, he shall, in addition to the monthly disability pension payment, and for the same period as such payment, receive from the Fund forty dollars ($40) per month for each dependent parent and each dependent minor child less than eighteen (18) years of age.

Statute B states, that in the event an Employee who is participating in [Statute B] incurs a disability through the performance of duty, the Employee or Employee's beneficiary or estate shall be entitled to receive from the Fund reimbursement for all travel, medical, surgical, and hospital expense directly resulting from such disability incurred before the Employee's death.

In addition, the Employee shall be entitled to receive monthly payments from the Fund. The amount of monthly disability payment shall be determined in accordance with the extent of disability. Disability payments shall be based on the possibility of twenty-five (25) Years of Service and on a maximum of one-half (½) of the Average Monthly Salary.

In the event an Employee shall become totally disabled in the performance of duty, he shall, in addition to the monthly disability pension payment, and for the same period as 3

such payment, receive from the Fund forty dollars ($40) per month for each dependent parent and each dependent minor child less than eighteen (18) years of age.

Statute C provides that, effective July 1, 2002, the disability benefits for a regular, paid police employee who is participating in [Statute A] immediately prior to his or her disability and is permanently and totally disabled by a catastrophic personal injury that (1) is sustained in the line of duty afer January 1, 2001, and (2) permanently prevents the Employee from performing any gainful work, shall be determined by this Section. An Employee that meets the requirements of this Section shall receive a disability pension equal to the Employee's regular salary at the commencement of the disability The disability pension provided under the terms of this Section is provided instead of the monthly disability pension payment set forth in [Statute A].

Statute D provides that, effective July 1, 2002, the disability benefits for a regular, paid police employee who is participating in [Statute B] immediately prior to his or her disability and is permanently and totally disabled by a catastrophic personal injury that (1) is sustained in the line of duty afer January 1, 2001, and (2) permanently prevents the Employee from performing any gainful work, shall be determined by this Section. An Employee that meets the requirements of this Section shall receive a disability pension equal to the Employee's regular salary at the commencement of the disability The disability pension provided under the terms of this Section is provided instead of the monthly disability pension payment set forth in [Statute B].

Under Statute E, if an employee dies in the line of duty, a surviving spouse, dependent children, dependent parent or parents are entitled to receive payments from the Fund.

Section 104(a)(1) of the Code states that, “Except in the case of amounts attributable to (and not in excess of) deductions allowed under section 213 (relating to medical, etc. expenses) for any prior taxable year, gross income does not include—(1) Amounts received under workmen's compensation acts as compensation for personal injuries or sickness... .”

Section 1.104-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations states that section 104(a)(1) of the Code excludes from gross income amounts received by an employee under a workmen's compensation act or under a statute in the nature of a workmen's compensation act that provides compensation to employees for personal injuries or sickness incurred in the course of employment. Section 104(a)(1) also applies to compensation which is paid under a workmen’s compensation act to the survivor or survivors of a deceased employee. However, section 104(a)(1) does not apply to a retirement pension or annuity to the extent that it is determined by reference to the employee's age or length of service, or the employee's prior contributions, even though the employee's retirement is occasioned by an occupational injury or sickness.

Accordingly, whether benefit payments are excludable by the recipient under section 104(a)(1) of the Code depends upon the nature of the statute under which they are paid, not the particular circumstances of the recipient, and benefits will not be 4

excludable where the statute allows for disability payments for any reason other than on-the-job injuries. See, Haar v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 864, (1982), affd. 709 F.2d 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

Based on the information submitted, representations made, and authorities cited above, we conclude as follows:

Statute A and Statute B restrict benefits to a class of employees who incur disabilities while in the performance of their duties and constitute statutes in the nature of workmen's compensation acts. Disability reimbursements and benefits paid under Statute A and Statute B to an employee who suffers a disability through the performance of duty are excludable from the gross income of the recipient under section 104(a)(1) of the Code.

Statute C and Statute D restrict benefits to a class of employees who become permanently and totally disabled by a catastrophic personal injury incurred in the line of duty and constitute statutes in the nature of workmen's compensation acts. Accordingly, disability benefits paid under Statute C and Statute D to an employee who suffers a catastrophic personal injury are excludable from the gross income of the recipient under section 104(a)(1) of the Code.

Statute E provides benefits which are limited to survivors of employees who die as a direct result of injury or illness incurred in the line of duty. Accordingly, amounts received by a surviving spouse, dependent children, dependent parent or parents of a deceased employee under Statute E are excludable from the gross income of the recipient under section 104(a)(1) of the Code.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied with respect to the application of any other provisions of the Code or the regulations to the benefits described.

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Harry Beker
Chief, Health & Welfare Branch
Office of Division Counsel /
Associate Chief Counsel
(Tax Exempt & Government Entities)

Enclosures
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace