PLR 200318035: Invalid S election excused after stock class correction

Number
200318035
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362
Ruling dated
January 17, 2003
Publicly released
May 2, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation elected S status after redeeming its preferred stock, but later discovered that two outstanding classes of common stock had different liquidation rights. Its board resolved to amend the charter to remove the distinction. The IRS found the resulting invalid S election inadvertent under § 1362(f). It ruled that the corporation would be treated as an S corporation from the intended effective date and afterward, provided its election was not otherwise terminated. The IRS did not decide whether the corporation met all other S corporation eligibility rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the corporation retain S treatment despite an inadvertently invalid election caused by a second common stock class?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to no other termination of the election.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b)(1), 1362(f).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200318035
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 5/2/2003
Index Number: 1362.04-00 Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01-PLR-168321-02
Date:
January 17, 2003

Legend

X
=

Date 1 =

Date 2 =

Date 3 =

Date 4 =

Dear
:

This responds to the letter dated December 9, 2002, and additional correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Facts

X was organized in Date 1 and elected to be treated as an S corporation effective Date 2. Prior to filing the election to be treated as an S corporation X had one class of common stock and three classes of preferred stock. Prior to Date 2 X redeemed all of the outstanding shares of the three classes of preferred stock. In Date 3 an attorney for one of X’s shareholders informed X that X’s certificate of incorporation authorized, and that X had issued, and had outstanding, a second class of common stock that provided different rights upon liquidation than the first class of common stock. On Date 4 X’s board of directors adopted a resolution to amend the certificate of incorporation to eliminate any distinction between the first and second classes of common stock. X and its shareholders then requested inadvertent invalid election relief under 1362(f) of the Code. 2 PLR-168321-02

X represents that there was no intent to knowingly make an invalid S election and that the events that resulted in the invalid election were not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required by the Secretary consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Law and Analysis

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term "S corporation" means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under 1362(a) is in effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) defines a "small business corporation" as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more than 75 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.

Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under 1362(a) by any corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of 1361 (b) or to obtain shareholder consents, (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in ineffectiveness, steps were taken so that the corporation is once more a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to 1362(f), agrees to make any adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to the period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness, the corporation shall be treated as continuing to be an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Conclusion

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X's invalid subchapter S election, as described above, was inadvertent within the meaning of 1362(f). Therefore, X will be treated as an S corporation from Date 2 and thereafter provided that X's S election is not otherwise terminated under 1362(d).

Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the above-described facts under any other provision of the 3 PLR-168321-02

Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed on whether X is otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being forwarded to the taxpayer.

Sincerely,

/s/ David R. Haglund

David R. Haglund
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace