PLR 200317053: Pension plan minimum funding waiver denied

Number
200317053
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
January 31, 2003
Publicly released
April 25, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company requested a waiver of its defined benefit pension plan's minimum funding standard for a plan year ending in 2001. The IRS denied the request because the company did not show that its hardship was temporary. The letter notes that the company's shares had stopped trading on NASDAQ, it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation had begun procedures to terminate the plan. It also says a conditional waiver for an earlier plan year became void after the plan failed to meet a later funding standard.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the company qualify for a waiver of its pension plan's minimum funding standard?
  • Outcome: Denied; the company did not establish that its hardship was temporary.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 412 (minimum funding waiver); the letter cites its UILC 0412.06-00.

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00
200317053

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND

GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION JAN 31 2003

In re:
Company =

This letter constitutes notice that with respect to the above-named defined benefit pension plan, your request for a waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ended July 31, 2001, has been denied. Please also note that, because the minimum funding standard for the plan year ended July 30, 2001, was not satisfied,

the conditional waiver for the plan year ended July 30, 2000, previously granted by letter dated February 27, 2001, is now retroactively null and void.

The information furnished indicates that the Company is a

whose shares once traded on the NASDAQ National Market System. However, trading of the Company’s shares has been suspended by NASDAQ and the Company has filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. It is also our understanding that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) has instituted procedures to terminate the plan.

The information furnished failed to demonstrate that the hardship was temporary, and a denial of the request was proposed. You were informed, by telephone call of December 16, 2002, of our tentative denial and were offered a conference of right. You, by telephone call of December 18, 2002, declined our offer of a conference of right. Therefore, our tentative denial is now final.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Manager, Employee Plans Classification in 200317053

2

If you have any questions on this ruling letter, please contact

Sincerely yours,

Carol D. Gold, Director
Employee Plans

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace