PLR 200315038: Government pension plan may transfer excess assets to retiree health account

Number
200315038
Outcome
Mixed outcome
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Governmental Plan
Code sections
§ 401, § 412, § 414, § 420
Ruling dated
January 15, 2003
Publicly released
April 11, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A county pension plan asked whether it could move excess pension assets to a retiree health account without losing qualified plan status. The IRS said governmental plans are eligible for section 420 transfers, but must calculate excess assets under the referenced section 412 rules even though governmental plans are generally exempt from section 412. The transfer is permitted if the section 401(h) account and section 420 conditions are met. The IRS declined to rule on whether this particular proposed transfer would preserve the plan's overall qualified status.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can a governmental plan transfer excess pension assets to a retiree health account?
  • Outcome: Mixed: general eligibility confirmed; plan-specific qualification ruling declined.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(h), 412(c)(7), 412(h)(3), 414(d), 420.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

200315038

TAX EXEMPT AND

GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JAN 15 2003

UIL: 414.07-00
420.00-00

In Re:
Act =

State A =
County B =
Dear

This is in response to your request for a ruling that the establishment of a section 401(h) account within the Plan and the transfer of excess pension assets to such account in accordance with section 420 of the Internal Revenue Code (“the Code") will not cause the Plan to fail to be a qualified plan under section 401 (a) of the Code.

Facts

The Plan was established in 1942 by the County and is a single-employer contributory defined benefit pension plan. Plan benefits and obligations are under authority of the Act. You have represented that the Plan is a governmental plan within the meaning of section 414(d) of the Code. You requested this ruling because the Plan, as a governmental plan, is not subject to the provisions of section 412 of the Code, subsections of which are included by reference in the provisions of section 420 of the Code.

The provisions of the Act apply to each county in the State of A in which a retirement system has been established. The Act provides that each retirement system, when established, shall be administered by a county retirement board. The Act also creates in each county in which a retirement system has been established a county employee's retirement fund consisting of all moneys arising from appropriations made by the county, contributions made by members of the county's retirement system, and all interest earned by investments of moneys of the fund.

200315038

Moneys contributed by the county are credited to a county annuity reserve account. Amounts contributed by members are credited to members’ annuity reserve accounts.

The Act provides that, upon retirement, members receive a retirement allowance (the "Retirement Allowance") consisting of a member's annuity that is actuarially equivalent to the accumulated contributions in the member's annuity account and a county annuity equal to a (varying) percentage of the member's final salary multiplied by his years of service. The Act also provides that in addition to the Retirement Allowance a county retirement board may grant to retired employees insurance or other similar benefits that the county has granted to other county employees.

On November 30, 2000, the county retirement board of County B (the "Board") passed a resolution that called for a portion of the assets in the county annuity reserve account of the County B employee's retirement fund (the "Fund") to be transferred to a separate medical plan account to be established within the Fund (the "Proposed Transfer"), subject to the receipt of a favorable ruling by the Internal Revenue Service concerning the tax- favored treatment of retirees and current County B employees who make contributions to and receive benefits from the Fund. In accordance with that resolution you request a ruling that the Proposed Transfer will comply with sections 401(h) and 420 of the Code and will not cause the Plan to fail to be a qualified plan.

Law

Section 412(c)(2)(A) of the Code provides that for purposes of that section, the value of the plan's assets shall be determined on the basis of any reasonable actuarial method of valuation which takes into account fair market value used to determine costs under the plan.

Section 412(c)(7)(A) of the Code provides that for purposes of paragraph (6), the term "full funding limitation" means the excess (if any) of -----

(i) the lesser of

(I) the applicable percentage of current liability (including the expected increase in current liability due to benefits accruing during the plan year), or

(II) the accrued liability (including normal cost) under the plan (determined under the entry age normal funding method if such accrued liability can not be directly calculated under the funding method used for the plan), over

200315038

(ii) the lesser of
(I) the fair market value of the plan's assets, or

(II) the value of such assets determined under paragraph (2) of that section.

Section 412(c)(7)(B) of the Code provides that for purposes of subparagraph (D) and subclause (I) of subparagraph (A)(i), the term "current liability" has the meaning given such term by subsection (l)(7) (without regard to subparagraphs (C) and (D) thereof) and using the rate of interest used under subsection (b)(5)(B).

Section 412(h)(3) of the Code provides that that section shall not apply to any governmental plan (within the meaning of section 414(d)).

Section 420(a)(1) of the Code provides that if there is a qualified transfer of any excess pension assets of a defined benefit plan (other than a multiemployer plan) to a health benefits account which is part of such plan, a trust which is part of such plan shall not be treated as failing to meet the requirements of subsection (a) or (h) of section 401 solely by reason of such transfer (or any other action authorized under that section).

Section 420(e)(2) of the Code provides that the term “excess pension assets” means the excess (if any) of

(A) the amount determined under section 412(c)(7)(A)(ii) over (B) the greater of (i) the amount determined under section 412(c)(7)(A)(i), or (ii) 125 percent of current liability (as defined in section 412(c)(7)(B))

The determination under section 420(e)(2) shall be made as of the most recent valuation date of the plan preceding the qualified transfer.

Analysis

The Plan is a pension plan and thus, subject to the provisions of section 401(h) of the Code, may establish a separate health benefit account within the Plan. The Plan is not a multi-employer plan and thus, subject to the provisions of section 420 of the Code, may transfer assets to such a health benefits account without causing the Plan to be treated as

failing to satisfy the requirements of subsections (a) and (h) of section 401(a) of the Code solely by reason of such transfer.

200315038

The fact that the Plan is a governmental plan does not bar the Plan from transferring excess pension assets to a separate health benefits account within the meaning of section 420 of the Code. Multiemployer plans are the only type of defined benefit plans expressly excluded by statutory language from making section 420 transfers. However, the general exemption of governmental plans from the requirements of section 412 of the Code (provided in section 412(h)(3)) does not provide an exemption from the technical requirements of certain provisions of section 420 that reference subsections of section 412.

Thus, a governmental plan, in order to comply with the requirements of section 420 of the Code must determine the amount of available excess assets available for transfer in accordance with section 420(e)(2) of the Code, and therefore must make the determinations provided for in sections 412(c)(7)(A)(i), 412(c)(7)(A)(ii), and 412(c)(7)(B) of the Code, notwithstanding the general exclusion of governmental plans from section 412. The fact that a governmental plan might not perform these calculations in the normal course of operations does not alter the fact that the meaning of the term “excess pension assets” for a governmental plan is the amount derived from performing the computations described in section 420(e)(2).

Therefore the transfer of excess pension assets to a retiree health account (satisfying the requirements of section 401(h) of the Code) within a qualified governmental plan is permitted under section 420 of the Code provided that such transfer satisfies the requirements of section 420, including, as noted above, the requirements of section 420 that reference subsections of section 412 of the Code.

Section 6.03 of Revenue Procedure 2002-4, 2002-1 IRB 127, provides that the Employee Plans Technical office ordinarily will not issue letter rulings on matters involving a plan’s qualified status under sections 401 through 420 of the Code and section 4975(e)(7) of the Code and that matters involving a plan’s qualified status are generally handled by the Employee Plans Determination program as provided in Rev. Proc. 2003-6 of 2003-1 IRB 191, Rev. Proc 93-19, and Rev. Proc. 93-12.

Therefore, we can not rule as to whether the Proposed Transfer in accordance with the Board resolution of November 30, 2000, will cause the Plan to fail to meet the requirements of sections 401(a) of the Code.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

A copy of this letter is being furnished to your authorized representative pursuant to a power of attorney (Form 2848) on file.

200315038

5

If you have any questions on this letter, please contact

Sincerely,

James E. Holland, Jr., Manager
Employee Plans Technical

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace