PLR 200314025: Former resident's expatriation lacks tax avoidance purpose
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A long-term U.S. resident planned to give up his green card and live in his country of birth and citizenship, where he would be taxed on worldwide income. His net worth exceeded the threshold for a tax avoidance presumption under section 877 as it then applied. The IRS concluded that his submission met the complete and good-faith requirements of Notice 98-34, removing that presumption. Based on the information submitted, it also concluded that U.S. tax avoidance was not one of his principal purposes for expatriating.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Does the planned relinquishment of permanent resident status have a principal U.S. tax avoidance purpose?
- Outcome: Approved; the IRS found no principal tax avoidance purpose
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 877, 2107, 2501(a)(3); Notice 98-34
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200314025
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 4/4/2003
Index Number: 877.01-00 Person to Contact:
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:Br1-PLR-153904-02
Date:
January 2, 2003
TY:
Legend
A
=
Date B
=
Country C
=
Year 1
=
Year 2
=
Date D
=
Dear
:
This is in response to your letter dated September 9, 2002, requesting a ruling that A’s loss of lawful permanent resident status (expatriation) will not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code. Additional information was submitted in a letter dated November 18, 2002. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
A was born on Date B in Country C. A came to the United States for employment reasons in Year 1 and obtained a green card in Year 2. A is a citizen of Country C. On Date D, A will relinquish his green card. A will be subject to Country C tax on his worldwide income. On the date of A's expatriation, his net worth exceeded the applicable amount set forth in section 877(a)(2). 2 PLR-153904-02
Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be subject to the special rules of section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.
A former U.S. citizen or former U.S. long-term resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107 and 2501(a)(3) if the individual's average income tax liability or the individual's net worth on the date of expatriation exceed certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A) and 2501(a)(3)(B).
A former U.S. citizen whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds these thresholds, however, will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen is described within certain statutory categories and submits a request for a ruling within one year of the date of loss of U.S. citizenship for the Secretary's determination as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. See sections 877(c)(1), 2107(a)(2)(B), and 2501(a)(3)(C).
Under Notice 98-34, 1998-2 C.B. 29, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B. 394, a former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable thresholds will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.
Notice 98-34 requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual's expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes.
A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because he is a citizen and resident, fully subject to tax in Country C, the country in which he was born.
A submitted all of the information required to be submitted by Notice 97-19, as modified by Notice 98-34, including additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.
Accordingly, based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34. Therefore, A will not be presumed under section 877(a)(2) to have as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes. We further conclude that A will not be treated under section 877(a)(2) as having 3 PLR-153904-02
as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes because the information submitted clearly establishes the lack of a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A's U.S. tax liability for the taxable years prior to or after his expatriation under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).
A copy of this letter must be attached to A's U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling (whether or not A is otherwise required to file a return).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to A.
Sincerely,
M. Grace Fleeman
Senior Counsel
CC:INTL:Br1
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace