PLR 200314012: First QTIP election cannot be extended; second was timely

Number
200314012
Outcome
Mixed outcome
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Gift to Spouse (Marital Deduction Allowed v. Not Allowed)
Topics
Code sections
§ 2523
Ruling dated
December 17, 2002
Publicly released
April 4, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer transferred property to a trust in two different years and sought relief concerning gift tax QTIP elections. No gift tax return or QTIP election was filed for the first transfer, while the election for the second transfer appeared on a timely filed return. The IRS said it lacked discretion under section 301.9100-3 to extend the first election's statutory deadline, and the automatic extension was unavailable because the first return was not filed on time. It concluded that the second year's election satisfied section 2523(f).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the missed first-year QTIP election be extended, and was the second-year election valid?
  • Outcome: Mixed; no extension for the first year, but the second election satisfied the statute
  • Key authorities: IRC § 2523(f); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-2(b), 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200314012
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 4/4/2003
Index Number: 2523.00-00 Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B04-PLR-169030-01
Date:
DECEMBER 17, 2002
In Re:

Legend:

Taxpayer =
Trust =
Date 1 =
Year 1 =
Year 2 =
$a =
$b =

Dear
:

This responds to a letter, dated March 19, 2002, and prior correspondence requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an inter vivos “qualified terminable interest property” (QTIP) election under § 2523(f) of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to Taxpayer’s Year 1 and Year 2 gifts to Trust.

FACTS

The facts submitted and representations made are as follows. Taxpayer established Trust on Date 1 in Year 1, transferring property valued at approximately $a to Trust in Year 1. Taxpayer did not file a Form 709 (United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return) for Year 1 and, accordingly, Taxpayer did not make the § 2523(f) QTIP election with respect to the transfer. In Year 2, Taxpayer transferred $b to Trust and made a QTIP election for $b on Schedule A of the timely filed Year 2 Form 709. 2 PLR-169030-01

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 2523(a) provides that where a donor transfers during the calendar year by gift an interest in property to a donee who at the time of the gift is the donor’s spouse, there shall be allowed as a deduction in computing taxable gifts for the calendar year an amount with respect to such interest equal to its value.

Section 2523(f)(1) provides that in the case of qualified terminable interest property, for purposes of § 2523(a), such property shall be treated as transferred to the donee spouse, and for purposes of § 2523(b)(1), no part of such property shall be considered as retained in the donor or transferred to any person other than the donee spouse.

Section 2523(f)(2) provides that the term “qualified terminable interest property” means any property which is transferred by the donor spouse, in which the donee spouse has a qualifying income interest for life, and to which an election under § 2523(f)(4) applies.

Section 2523(f)(4)(A) provides that an election under § 2423(f) with respect to any property shall be made on or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for filing a gift tax return with respect to the transfer (determined without regard to § 6019(2)) and shall be made in such manner as the Secretary shall by regulations prescribe. An election under § 2523(f)(4), once made, is irrevocable. § 2523(f)(4)(B).

Section 301.9100-1 provides that the Commissioner, in exercising his discretion, may grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. A statutory election means an election whose due date is prescribed by statute. § 301.9100-1(b).

An automatic extension of 6 months from the due date of a return excluding extensions is granted to make regulatory or statutory elections whose due dates are the due date of the return or the due date of the return including extensions provided the taxpayer timely files its return for the year the election should have been made and the taxpayer takes corrective action (file an original or a supplemental return) within that 6-month extension period. § 301.9100-2(b), (c).

The time for filing the inter vivos QTIP election is expressly prescribed by § 2523(f)(4). The taxpayer did not timely file a Form 709 for Year 1 and, accordingly, the 6-month automatic extension period under § 301.9100-2(b) was not available to the taxpayer for Year 1. Further, the taxpayer did not take any corrective action for Year 1 within the 6-month extension period. Because § 301.9100-3 is applicable only to requests for extensions of time fixed by regulations or other published guidance, the 3 PLR-169030-01

Commissioner does not have the discretion to grant a request for an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 to make the QTIP election under § 2523(f)(4) for the Year 1 transfer to the trust. A QTIP election for the Year 2 transfer of $b was made on Schedule A of the timely filed Year 2 Form 709 and, accordingly, satisfies the statutory requirements under § 2523(f).

The ruling contained in this letter was based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by the taxpayer. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosure
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace