PLR 200311021: State production credit does not reduce federal wind electricity credit

Number
200311021
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Limitations and Adjustments
Code sections
§ 45, § 29
Ruling dated
December 9, 2002
Publicly released
March 14, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A developer planned to generate wind electricity and sell it to an unrelated buyer. State law offered an income tax credit based on electricity produced and sold, with no requirement to reinvest the proceeds in the project. The developer asked whether that state credit would reduce the federal renewable electricity production credit under section 45(b)(3). The IRS ruled it would not, because the state credit was tied to electricity production and sales, rather than the project's construction or acquisition cost. The IRS did not decide whether the project met any other section 45 requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a state income tax credit based on wind electricity production reduce the federal production credit?
  • Outcome: Approved: the state credit does not cause a reduction under section 45(b)(3)
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 45(a), 45(b)(3), 29(b)(3)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200311021
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 3/14/2003
Index Number: 45.02-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:5 -- PLR-153901-02
Date:
December 9, 2002

LEGEND:

Taxpayer =

Project =

State =

State Law =

Dear
:

This letter responds to a letter dated September 24, 2002, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer, requesting a private letter ruling regarding § 45 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Taxpayer represents the following facts:

Taxpayer is currently developing Project in State. Project will produce electricity from wind. Project will generate wind energy and deliver power to customers in the wholesale power market. Taxpayer is currently negotiating a power purchase agreement with an unrelated party to sell electricity produced by Project.

State Law provides a State income tax credit for electricity produced from certain renewable resources, including wind, and sold to an unrelated person. The amount of the State income tax credit is based upon the amount of electricity produced and not the capital cost of construction or acquisition. Taxpayer is not obligated to reinvest any proceeds attributable to the credit in Project or any other project for producing electricity from renewable resources.

Section 45 provides a federal income tax credit for electricity produced from certain renewable resources, including wind, and sold to an unrelated person.

2
PLR-153901-02

Section 45(b)(3) provides that the amount of the credit determined under § 45(a) with respect to any project for any taxable year (determined after the application of § 45(b)(1) and (2)) shall be reduced by the amount that is the product of the amount so determined for the year and a fraction:

(A) the numerator of which is the sum, for the taxable year and all prior taxable years, of:

(i) grants provided by the United States, a State, or a political subdivision of a State for use in connection with the project,

(ii) proceeds of an issue of State or local government obligations used to provide financing for the project the interest on which is exempt from tax under § 103,

(iii) the aggregate amount of subsidized energy financing provided (directly or indirectly) under a Federal, State, or local program provided in connection with the project, and

(iv) the amount of any other credit allowable with respect to any property that is part of the project, and

(B) the denominator of which is the aggregate amount of additions to the capital account for the project for the taxable year and all prior taxable years.

The amounts under the preceding sentence for any taxable year shall be determined as of the close of the taxable year.

Section 29(b)(3) provides a similar reduction in the credit allowed by § 29(a), relating to the production and sale of fuel from a nonconventional source.

Regarding the reduction provided by § 29(b)(3), the Conference Report, H.R.
Conf. Rep. No. 817, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 140 (1980), 1980-3 C.B. 245, 300, states the following:

To the extent that the [§ 29] credit is available for the production and sale of any of the eligible sources, it is reduced in proportion to Federal, State, and local grants, subsidized energy loans, and tax-exempt financing provided in connection with the construction or acquisition of the facility or its equipment.

See also, Rev. Rul. 85-77, 1985-1 C.B. 15.

3
PLR-153901-02

The State income tax credit provided by State Law is directly attributable to the amount of electricity produced and sold by Project and not to the capital cost of construction or acquisition of Project.

Accordingly, based solely on the representations and the relevant law set forth above, we conclude that the amount of any credit under § 45 will not be reduced under § 45(b)(3) because of the State income tax credit provided by State Law.

No opinion is expressed or implied regarding the application of any other provisions of the Code or Income Tax Regulations. Specifically, we express no opinion on whether any other requirement of § 45 is met.

According to the power of attorney on file with the ruling request, a copy of this letter is being sent to Taxpayer and Taxpayer’s other authorized representative.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Susan J. Reaman

SUSAN J. REAMAN
Branch Chief, Branch 5
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures:
Copy of letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace