CCA 200308033: Counsel requests more facts about fishing settlement proceeds

Number
200308033
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Nonrecognition of Gain or Loss on Contributions; Extent of Recognition of Gain or Loss on Distribution; Transfer to Corporation Controlled by Transferor; Pass-Thru of Items to Shareholders
Ruling dated
November 12, 2002
Publicly released
February 21, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel was asked how to treat settlement payments for lost fishing income, reduced permit value, and reduced boat value when fishing activity was conducted through a corporation or partnership. The payments also included punitive damages. Counsel said more facts were needed to determine the tax consequences, including how the timing of the entity's formation related to the damages. The public release gives no substantive answer or Code section analysis beyond the UILC codes printed in its header.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How should fishing settlement proceeds be taxed when a corporation or partnership conducts the activity?
  • Outcome: Advice given: more facts are needed before the tax consequences can be determined.
  • Key authorities: No substantive Code provision is analyzed in the public text; the header lists UILC 721, 731, 351, and 1366.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
IN T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V IC E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL
November 12, 2002

Number: 200308033
CC:PSI:B02
Release Date: 2/21/2003
PRENO-145461-02

UILC: 721.00-00; 731.00-00; 351.00-00; 1366.00-00

MEMORANDUM FOR Associate Area Counsel
CC:SB:7:SEA:1

FROM: Carolyn Hinchman Gray
Senior Counsel CC:PSI:2
Heather Faught
CC:PSI:2

SUBJECT: Reporting of Settlement Proceeds

This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your memorandum dated August 19, 2002.
In accordance with I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3), this Chief Counsel Advice should not be cited as precedent.

ISSUE

What are the tax consequences to taxpayers of the payment of settlement proceeds for lost fishing income, devaluation of an owner’s fishing permit, and devaluation of fishing boats when the fishing activity is conducted by a corporation or partnership formed either before or after these damages occurred?

CONCLUSIONS

More fact development is necessary to adequately address the tax consequences of the settlement proceeds for lost fishing income, devaluation of an owner’s fishing permit, and devaluation of fishing boats when the fishing activity is conducted by a corporation or partnership formed either before or after these damages occurred?

FACTS

A qualified settlement fund has begun distributing settlement payments to taxpayers. Compensatory damages are for lost fishing income, devaluation of an owner’s fishing permit, and devaluation of fishing boats. Punitive damages are paid in proportion to the compensatory damages.
2
PRENO-145461-02

Under state law, the fishing permit may only be owned by an individual. Fishing activities are frequently carried on through a partnership or a corporation, where a partner or a shareholder remains the legal owner of the fishing permit.

CASE DEVELOPMENT, HAZARDS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

In order to answer your questions as to the effect of the settlement proceeds we need to have more information. In particular:

This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may have an adverse effect on privileges, such as the attorney client privilege. If disclosure becomes necessary, please contact this office for our views.

Please call if you have any further questions.

HEATHER C. MALOY
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

By:
CAROLYN HINCHMAN GRAY
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace