CCA 200307087: Retread tire costs depend on use and useful life

Number
200307087
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Repair v. Permanent Improvement
Code sections
§ 162, § 263
Ruling dated
January 28, 2003
Publicly released
February 14, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel clarified earlier advice about taxpayers that did not elect a special capitalization method for vehicle tires. Such taxpayers must treat retread tires used as original or replacement tires on newly acquired trucks, tractors, or trailers as separate assets. Their cost must be capitalized and depreciated unless the tires are consumed in less than one year. The cost of retreading existing tires also must be capitalized if the work appreciably extends their useful life or materially increases their value. Whether those conditions are met depends on the facts, and Chief Counsel did not determine the useful life of any taxpayer's tires.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How should taxpayers outside the special tire method account for retread tires and retreading costs?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 1.162-4; W.H. Thompkins Co. v. Commissioner, 47 B.T.A. 292 (1942); Rev. Rul. 59-249.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL
January 28, 2003

Number: 200307087
Release Date: 2/14/2003
CC:PSI:6:
POSTS-103748-03
UILC: 263.03-02

MEMORANDUM FOR ROBIN HERRELL, SPECIAL COUNSEL, CC:LM:HMT:CIN:1

FROM: Kathleen Reed
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 6, Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), CC:PSI:6

SUBJECT: Request for Supplemental Advice on “Retread” or “Recap”
Tires

This Chief Counsel Advice supplements the advice previously issued in this matter on October 31, 2002. In accordance with section 6110(k)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, this Chief Counsel Advice should not be cited as precedent.

Our previous Chief Counsel Advice (“Advice”) considered the proper accounting treatment of the cost of “retread” or “recap” tires (hereinafter, “retread tires”) for taxpayers electing to account for this cost under the original tire capitalization method described in section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2002-27, 2002-17 I.R.B. 802 (the “OTC method”), as well as for taxpayers not electing to account for this cost under the OTC method. You have asked us to clarify the portion of our Advice that concerns taxpayers that did not elect to use the OTC method to account for the cost of their retread tires. It has been suggested that, in accordance with our Advice, such non-electing taxpayers generally should deduct the cost of all retread tires. As discussed below, the Advice does not support this proposition.

The Advice makes clear that taxpayers not electing to account for the cost of original tires and replacement tires for all qualifying vehicles under the OTC method may not treat retread tires used as the original or replacement set of tires on newly acquired tractors, trailers and/or trucks as part of the vehicle for depreciation purposes but, instead, must treat these tires as separate assets. As such, the cost of retread tires must be capitalized and recovered through depreciation unless the tires are consumable in less than one year. See W.H. Thompkins Co. v.
Commissioner, 47 B.T.A. 292 (1942); Rev. Rul. 59-249, 1959-2 C.B. 55. The Advice makes no statement regarding the useful life of retread tires. The useful life of a particular taxpayer’s retread tires is a question of fact subject to verification upon audit.

2
POSTS-103748-03

In addition, we note that the cost of retreading tires must be capitalized if the retreading process appreciably prolongs a tire’s original useful life or materially increases its value. See section 1.162-4 of the Income Tax Regulations. It is our understanding that tires are put through the retreading process when they are no longer usable because of low tread depth. Presumably, the tires have little value at this point. After the retreading process, the tires are again usable and, according to our information, are generally worth about 50% of the value of new tires. Therefore, the retreading process appears to appreciably prolong a tire’s original useful life or materially increases its value. However, these conclusions can only be reached by factual inquiry.

If you have any questions on this matter, contact at
.

Kathleen Reed
Kathleen Reed

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace