PLR 200307078: Taxpayer gets more time for GST allocations to child trusts

Number
200307078
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Inclusion Ratio; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 2513, § 2601, § 2611, § 2631, § 2632, § 2642
Ruling dated
November 14, 2002
Publicly released
February 14, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer created separate trusts for a son and daughter and transferred cash and stock to each. The taxpayer and spouse filed gift tax returns electing to split the gifts, but the taxpayer made no generation-skipping transfer tax exemption allocation. The accountant who prepared the returns had not participated in their estate planning and had not been told to make the allocation. The IRS granted 60 days to allocate the taxpayer's available exemption on a supplemental Form 709. The allocations would take effect on the original transfer date, using the value of property transferred on that date. The IRS did not rule on the value of the transferred property.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer make late GST exemption allocations to the two trusts?
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2631, 2632, and 2642(g); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200307078
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 2/14/2003
Index Numbers: 2642.00-00; 9100.00-00 Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B09-PLR-141293-02
Date:
November 14, 2002

LEGEND:

Date 1
=
Taxpayer
=

Trust A
=

Son
=
Trust B
=

Daughter
=
a
=
X
=
Corporation
=
b
=
Year 1
=
c
=
Spouse
=

Dear
:

This is in response to your letter dated July 17, 2002, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an allocation of Generation-Skipping Transfer (GST) exemption.

2
PLR-141293-02

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: On Date 1, Taxpayer established Trust A, an irrevocable trust, for the benefit of Son and Taxpayer’s descendants, and Trust B, an irrevocable trust, for the benefit of Daughter and Taxpayer’s descendants.

Article IV, paragraph 1 of Trust A provides that the trustee shall pay to Son all the net income and may pay to him so much of the principal as the trustee from time to time considers necessary for his support and health, taking into account Son’s income known to the trustee.

Article IV, paragraph 2 of Trust A provides that on Son’s death, the trust estate shall be distributed to or for one or more persons or organizations other than Son, Son’s estate, or the creditors of either, in such proportions and subject to such trusts, powers and conditions as Son appoints by will specifically referring to this power of appointment. To the extent Son does not effectively exercise this power of appointment, on Son’s death the trustee shall divide the trust, per stirpes, into trusts for Son’s then living descendants, or if none, per stirpes into trusts for Taxpayer’s then living descendants. The trustee shall administer each trust set aside for a grandchild of Taxpayer under Article IV, paragraph 3 and shall immediately distribute each trust set aside for a descendant other than a grandchild of Taxpayer to the descendant; except that if a trust is set aside for Daughter, that trust shall be administered under the terms of Trust B.

Article IV, paragraph 3 of Trust A provides for the administration of each trust set aside for a grandchild of Taxpayer.

The terms of Trust B are identical to Trust A, except that the primary beneficiary of Trust B is Daughter.

On Date 1, Taxpayer transferred $a to Trust A and $a to Trust B. Also on Date 1, Taxpayer transferred X shares of Corporation common stock to Trust A and X shares of Corporation common stock to Trust B. The reported value of X shares of Corporation common stock was $b. The total reported value of all property transferred to Trust A and Trust B in Year 1 was $c.

Taxpayer and his spouse, Spouse, each timely filed gift tax returns for Year 1 reporting the transfers to Trust A and Trust B and electing to split gifts made by them to third parties during the calendar year under § 2513 of the Internal Revenue Code. Taxpayer’s and Spouse’s Year 1 gift tax returns were prepared by an accountant. The accountant, however, had not participated in Taxpayer and Spouse’s estate planning and was not told that an allocation of their respective GST exemptions should have been made to the transfers to Trust A and Trust B. No allocation of Taxpayer’s GST exemption was made on the Year 1 gift tax return. No additional transfers have been made to, and no distributions have been made from, Trust A and Trust B.

3
PLR-141293-02

Taxpayer has requested the following ruling: an extension of time under § 2642(g) and §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to make an allocation of Taxpayer’s GST exemption for the transfers to Trust A and Trust B in Year 1.

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer (GST). A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000 (adjusted for inflation under § 2631(c)) that may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual’s estate (determined with regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 2642(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return filed on or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer or is deemed to be made under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1) the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12 (within the meaning of § 2001(f)(2)), or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of an estate tax inclusion period, its value at the time of the close of the estate tax inclusion period, and such allocation shall be effective on and after the date of such transfer, or, in the case of an allocation deemed to have been made at the close of an estate tax inclusion period, on and after the close of such estate tax inclusion period.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of § 2642(g)(1), which was enacted into law on June 7, 2001.

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

4
PLR-141293-02

Notice 2001-50, 2001-34 I.R.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust as a generation-skipping trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make an allocation of Taxpayer’s available GST exemption, with respect to Taxpayer’s transfers to Trust A and Trust B in Year 1. The allocation will be effective as of Date 1, the date of the transfers to Trust A and Trust B. The amount of GST exemption to be allocated to Trust A and Trust B will be based on the value of the property transferred to Trust A and Trust B, respectively, as of the date of the transfers.

The allocation should be made on a supplemental Form 709 United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return and filed with the Internal Revenue

5
PLR-141293-02

Service Center, Cincinnati, OH 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to the supplemental Form 709. A copy is enclosed for this purpose.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as specifically ruled herein, we express or imply no opinion on the federal tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code. In addition, we express or imply no opinion regarding the value of the property transferred to Trust A and Trust B.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Heather C. Maloy

Heather C. Maloy
Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosures
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace