PLR 200303059: Expatriate did not overcome tax avoidance finding

Number
200303059
Outcome
Denied
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Principal Purpose--the Avoidance of Tax
Topics
Code sections
§ 877, § 2107, § 2501
Ruling dated
October 21, 2002
Publicly released
January 17, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A former U.S. citizen asked the IRS to rule that avoiding U.S. tax was not a principal purpose of giving up citizenship. His net worth exceeded the threshold that triggered a presumption of tax avoidance under the law then in effect. The IRS accepted his submission as complete and made in good faith, but concluded that the information he provided clearly established a principal tax avoidance purpose. The letter does not describe the specific facts behind that finding. The IRS said he would be subject to the special income, estate, and gift tax provisions cited in the ruling and described his filing obligations during the following ten years.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the taxpayer's loss of U.S. citizenship lack a principal purpose of avoiding U.S. tax?
  • Outcome: Denied.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 877, 2107, 2501(a)(3); Notice 98-34.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 200303059
Release Date: 1/17/03
Index No.: 877.01-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number

Refer Reply to
CC:INTL:Br1; PLR-100824-02
Date:

October 21, 2002
Legend
A
=
Date B =
Date C =
Country D =
Date E =
Year F =

Dear :

This is in response to a letter dated B, by A’s authorized representative, requesting a ruling under section 877(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 ("Code") that A’s loss of U.S. citizenship did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes under subtitle A or subtitle B of the Code.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by penalty of perjury statements executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for ruling, it is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

A has been a citizen of Country D during his entire life by reason of his birth on Date E in Country D. A became a naturalized U.S. citizen in Year F. A relinquished his U.S. citizenship (“expatriated”) on Date C. On the date of A’s expatriation, his net worth exceeded the threshold required under section 877(a)(2).

Section 877 generally provides that a citizen who loses U.S. citizenship or a U.S. long-term resident who ceases to be taxed as a lawful permanent resident (individuals who "expatriate") within the 10-year period immediately preceding the close of the taxable year will be taxed under section 877(b) and section 877(d) for such taxable year, unless such loss did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. Sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3) provide special estate and gift tax regimes, respectively, for individuals who expatriate with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes.

PLR-100824-02
Page 2

A former citizen or former long-term resident will be treated as having expatriated with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes for purposes of sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3) if the individual's average income tax liability or the individual's net worth on the date of expatriation exceeds certain thresholds. See sections 877(a)(2), 2107(a)(2)(A), and 2501(a)(3)(B).

Under Notice 98-34, 1998-2 C.B. 29, modifying Notice 97-19, 1997-1 C.B. 394, a former U.S. citizen or former long-term resident whose net worth or average tax liability exceeds the applicable threshold will not be presumed to have a principal purpose of tax avoidance if that former citizen or former resident is described within certain categories and submits a complete and good faith request for a ruling as to whether such loss had for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. A is eligible to request a ruling pursuant to Notice 98-34 because A is a citizen of Country D, the country in which A was born.

Notice 98-34 requires that certain information be submitted with a request for a ruling that an individual's expatriation did not have for one of its principal purposes the avoidance of U.S. taxes. A submitted all the information required by Notice 98-34, including any additional information requested by the Service after review of the submission.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that A has made a complete and good faith submission in accordance with section 877(c)(1)(B) and Notice 98-34. However, we further conclude that A will, nevertheless, be treated under section 877(a)(1) as having as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes because the information submitted clearly establishes a principal purpose to avoid taxes under subtitle A or B of the Code. Accordingly, A will be subject to the provisions of section 877(b) and section 877(d) and the applicable provisions of sections 2107 and 2501(a)(3).

Because A is treated under section 877(a)(1) as having as one of his principal purposes for expatriating the avoidance of U.S. taxes, he must file a U.S. income tax return (Form 1040NR), with the information described in Notice 97-19, section VII, Annual Information Reporting, for each year in the 10-year period following expatriation if he is liable for U.S. tax under any provision of the Code, as modified by section 877. For purposes of computing the tax due under section 877, A must recognize the realized or unrealized gains as a result of any “exchange” described in section 877(d)(2)(B), (d)(2)(E)(i), or (d)(2)(E)(ii) in the year of the exchange. For further information, A should refer to the Instructions to Form 1040NR, U.S. Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed as to A's U.S. tax liability for taxable periods prior to his loss of U.S. citizenship or for taxable periods after his

PLR-100824-02
Page 3

loss of U.S. citizenship under sections of the Code other than sections 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3).

A copy of this letter must be attached to A's U.S. income tax return for the year in which A obtained the ruling.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to A’s representative.

Sincerely yours,

________
W. EDWARD WILLIAMS
Senior Technical Reviewer
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace