PLR 200302044: Changes to stock offering and intercompany debt leave prior spin-off rulings intact

Number
200302044
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Spin-Off; Assets for Control of Transferee (Type "D")
Code sections
§ 355, § 368
Ruling dated
October 9, 2002
Publicly released
October 10, 2003

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2003
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer sought a supplemental ruling about corporate distributions previously addressed under sections 355 and 368. The taxpayer said one controlled corporation would not make a public stock offering within the originally represented 12 months and that some intercompany debt remained after its stock distribution. The IRS held that those changes had no adverse effect on the prior letter's rulings, which remained in force. The letter gives no new ruling on issues beyond those changes.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Do a delayed public stock offering and later repayment of intercompany debt alter the prior rulings on the distributions?
  • Outcome: Approved: the prior rulings remain in full force and effect.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 355, 368.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200302044
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/10/2003
Index Numbers: 355.01.00
Person to Contact:
368.04-00
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B03-PLR-150931-02
Date:
October 9, 2002

Legend

Distributing
=

Controlled 1
=

Controlled 2
=

ii
=

Date X
=

Date Y
=

Date Z
=

Dear
:

This letter responds to a request dated September 12, 2002, for a supplemental ruling with respect to a ruling letter dated February 5, 2001 (PLR-108328-00, LTR 200118045), (the “Prior Letter”). The Prior Letter concerned a proposed transaction under §§ 355 and 368 (“Distributions”). The facts and representations set forth in the Prior Letter are hereby incorporated, except as modified below, for purposes of this supplemental ruling.

The Prior Letter contained the following paragraphs:

-2-
PLR-150931-02

(xiv) Within one year of the completion of the Distributions, each of Controlled 1 and Controlled 2 will issue ii% of its stock to the public.

(5n) No intercorporate debt will exist between Distributing or any related party, on the one hand, and Controlled 1 or Controlled 2 or any related party, on the other hand, at the time of or after the Distributions except for the continued guarantee by Distributing of the Controlled 2 public debentures and continued guarantee by Distributing of the Controlled 2 redemption rights.

In your current request you have indicated that, contrary to the facts and representations of the Prior Letter, 1) there will not be a public offering of Controlled 1 stock within 12 months of Date X, the date of the distribution of Controlled 1 stock, and 2) some intercorporate debt, not previously described, still existed between Distributing and Controlled 1 after Date X. Controlled 1 will now issue stock to the public by Date Y. All debt between Distributing and Controlled 1 was not repaid until Date Z.

Based upon the facts and information submitted, we hold that the changes from the Prior Letter, described above, will have no adverse effect on any of the rulings contained in the Prior Letter and such rulings remain in full force and effect.

We express no opinion about the tax treatment of the transaction under other provisions of the Code and regulations or about the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the transaction that are not specifically covered by the above ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings. It is subject to verification on examination.

Each affected taxpayer must attach a copy of this letter to the taxpayer's federal income tax return for the tax year in which the transaction covered by this ruling letter is consummated.

-3-
PLR-150931-02

We have sent a copy of this letter to the authorized representative designated on the power of attorney on file in this office.

Sincerely yours,

Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace