CCA 200301041: IRS should not claim proceeds from rings held by another agency
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2003, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer with unpaid tax liabilities sent two rings for the benefit of the Treasury. The rings reached the General Services Administration, and the IRS initially suggested that the agency sell them and send the net proceeds to the IRS. Chief Counsel advised that the IRS should take no action and should not ask the GSA to act on its behalf. When the IRS pursues property held by another federal agency, established practice calls for a formal levy. Chief Counsel found no authority to bypass the Code's seizure and sale rules by having the GSA sell the rings and remit proceeds. The GSA could dispose of the rings as it chose, but any sale proceeds should not be sent to the IRS.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the IRS have the GSA sell forfeited rings and remit proceeds toward the taxpayer's liability?
- Outcome: Advice; do not seek the sale or its proceeds.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6330, 6331, 6335; United States v. Freedman, 444 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1971).
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
-1-
November 27, 2001
OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL
Number: 200301041
CC:PA:CBS:Br1
Release Date 1/3/2003
GL-132553-01
UIL: 6330.00-00; 6331.00-00; 6335.00-00
MEMORANDUM FOR Area Counsel
SBSE:Area 3
Nashville
FROM: Mitchel S. Hyman
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
(Collection, Bankruptcy & Summonses)
SUBJECT: Disposition of Rings Forfeited for the Benefit of the
United States Treasury
This memorandum responds to your request for advice in the above-referenced matter. In accordance with I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3), this Chief Counsel Advice should not be cited as precedent. This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may have an adverse effect on privileges, such as the attorney client privilege. If disclosure becomes necessary, please contact this office for our views.
QUESTION PRESENTED
What action, if any, should the Service take with regard to two rings now in the possession of the General Services Administration that a taxpayer, who has outstanding tax liabilities, forfeited for the benefit of the United States Treasury?
CONCLUSION
We agree with your conclusion that the General Services Administration be informed that the Service does not plan to take any action or request that the GSA take any action with respect to the rings. The GSA may dispose of the rings as it sees fit. If the GSA decides to sell the rings, no sale proceeds should be remitted to the Service.
-2-
FACTS
On
, the taxpayer, who has outstanding tax liabilities, sent a letter to
, enclosing two rings that belonged to the . The value of the rings has not been determined.
The taxpayer’s letter stated that he was forfeiting the rings for “the benefit of the
United States Treasury” and asked that
forward them to the Treasury.
The taxpayer conceded “defeat” in an apparent dispute with the Service over his tax liabilities. After an unsuccessful attempt to return the rings to the taxpayer, on April 27, 2001, sent them to the General Services Administration (“GSA”). The GSA contacted the
, which in turn asked the Service whether it wished to seize the rings and sell them. The Service indicated that it did not wish to seize the rings but suggested that the GSA sell them and forward the net sale proceeds to the Service.
DISCUSSION
It is an established practice of the Service, recognized by the courts, to proceed against property in the hands of other federal agencies by a formal levy. See, e.g., United States v. Freedman, 444 F. 2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1971); Carlo v. United States, 286 F. 2d 841, 848-49 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U. S. 944 (1961); Simpson v. Thomas, 271 F. 2d 450 (4th Cir. 1959); see also I.R.M. 5.11.6.
Citing the procedural requirements of levying on the rings, the Service indicated that it does not wish to pursue this avenue. We find no authority for asking the GSA to sell the rings and forward the proceeds to the Service. Furthermore, we advise against any course of action that may appear to circumvent the Code’s requirements in the case of seizures and sales. See I.R.C. §§ 6330, 6331, 6335.
We, therefore, agree with your determination to advise the GSA that the Service does not plan to take any action or request that the GSA take any action with respect to the rings. The GSA may dispose of the rings as it sees fit. If the GSA decides to sell the rings, no sale proceeds should be remitted to the Service.
Please call the attorney assigned to this case at with any further comments or questions.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace