PLR 200252093: Divorce order may secure a spouse's claim against retirement benefits

Number
200252093
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Domestic Relations Orders
Code sections
§ 401, § 414, § 501
Ruling dated
October 21, 2002
Publicly released
December 27, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A divorcing couple planned to give one spouse a security interest in the other's remaining retirement plan account to secure an obligation under their divorce judgment. The IRS ruled that the security interest would be a permitted assignment under section 401(a)(13)(B) if it was incorporated into a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO). The order had not yet been drafted, so the ruling assumes it would meet the requirements of section 414(p). The IRS also assumed the plan and trust remained qualified and exempt, and it did not rule on a separate distribution to the spouse.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a QDRO give one spouse a security interest in the other's retirement plan benefits?
  • Outcome: Approved, assuming the later order qualifies as a QDRO.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(13)(B), 414(p), 501(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.401(a)-13(c)(1)(ii), 1.401(a)(13)-1(g)(1).

Full text (IRS public release)

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

200252093

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

OCT 21 2002

UIL No: 401.10-04

Legend

Taxpayer A

Spouse B
Plan X
State Y

Dear

This is in response to your letter dated August 26, 2002, submitted by your personal representative, in which you request a ruling that a security interest pursuant to a Martial Settlement Agreement between you and your spouse is an assignment permitted under section 401(a)(13)(B) of the Code.

Taxpayer A and Spouse B are in the process of completing a divorce in State Y. Pursuant to the Martial Settlement Agreement incorporated into the Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage between Taxpayer A and Spouse B, the following transactions are to occur:

  1. The sum of $ [redacted] from Taxpayer’s A account in Plan X will be
    transferred to Spouse B as her sole and separate property to be distributed and rolled over into an individual retirement account pursuant to a QDRO. The QDRO was entered on [redacted].

  2. The balance of Taxpayer A’s account in the Plan is to be Taxpayer
    A’s sole and separate property.

  3. Spouse B is to receive a security interest in Taxpayer A’s remaining
    interest in Plan X to secure Taxpayer A’s obligation to Spouse B under the Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage between Taxpayer A and Spouse B.

  4. The assignment of the security interest in paragraph (3) above will
    occur pursuant to a second QDRO not yet drafted.

200252093

Plan X received a favorable determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service dated July 22, 1998 on its status as a qualified plan under section 401(a) of the Code.

Based on the above facts and representations, your authorized representative has requested a ruling that the creation of the security interest (as described in paragraph (3) above is an assignment permitted pursuant to section 401(a)(13)(B) of the Code.

Section 401(a)(13)(A) of the Code provides in general that a trust shall not constitute a qualified trust unless the plan of which the trust is a part provides that benefits provided under the plan may not be assigned or alienated.

However, Code section 401(a)(13)(B) provides a special rule for QDROs. Code section 401(a)(13)(B) provides that subparagraph (A) shall apply to the creation, assignment, or recognition of a right to any benefit payable with respect to a domestic relations order, except that subparagraph (A) shall not apply if the order is determined to be a QDRO.

Under section 1.401(a)-13(c)(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations, the term “assignment” includes any direct or indirect arrangement (whether revocable or irrevocable) whereby a party acquires from a participant or beneficiary a right or interest enforceable against the plan in, or to, all or any part of a plan benefit payment which is, or may become, payable to the participant or beneficiary.

Section 1.401(a)(13)-1(g)(1) of the Regulations provides in relevant part that the term "QDRO" has the meaning set forth in section 414(p) of the Code.

Section 414(p)(1)(A) of the Code provides that, for purposes of section 414(p) and section 401(a)(13) of the Code, the term "QDRO" means a domestic relations order (i) which creates or recognizes the existence of an alternate payee's right to, or assigns to an alternate payee the right to, receive all or a portion of the benefits payable with respect to a participant under a plan, and (ii) with respect to which the requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) are met.

Paragraph (2) of Code section 414(p) provides that the order must clearly specify certain facts. These facts include (A) the names and addresses of the participant and each alternative payee, (B) the amount or percentage, or manner of determining the amount or percentage, to be paid by the plan to each alternate payee, (C) the number of payments or period to which the order applies, and (D) each plan to which the order applies.

Paragraph (3) of Code section 414(p) provides that the order may not alter the amount, form, etc. of benefits under the plan. The order may not (A) require a plan to provide any type or form of benefit, or any option, not otherwise provided under the plan, (B) require a plan to provide increased benefits, or (C) require

200252093

payment of benefits to an alternate payee which are required to be paid to another alternate payee under another QDRO.

However, clause (A) of Code section 414(p)(3) is subject to an exception for certain payments made before a participant has separated from service, but after the participant has attained the earliest retirement age, as defined in Code section 414(p)(4). In addition, section 1.401(a)-13(g)(3) of the Regulations provides for a waiver of certain distribution requirements when a payment is made pursuant to a QDRO.

Under section 414(p)(1)(B) of the Code, the term "domestic relations order" means, in relevant part, any judgement which (i) relates to the provision of marital property rights to a spouse or former spouse of a participant, and (ii) is made pursuant to a State domestic relations law (including a community property law).

Code section 414(p)(8), in relevant part, defines “alternate payee" to include any spouse or former spouse of a plan participant who is recognized by a domestic relations order as having a right to receive all, or a portion of, the participant's plan benefit.

You have asked whether the security arrangement described in paragraph (3) above, in which a security interest is placed against Taxpayer A’s remaining interest in Plan X in accordance with the terms of a QDRO, is an assignment permitted under section 401(a)(13)(B) of the Code.

Section 1.401(a)-13(c)(1)(ii) of the Regulations defines "assignment" broadly, to include any indirect arrangement whereby a party, such as Spouse B, acquires from a participant, such as Taxpayer A, a right enforceable against the plan in all or any part of a plan benefit payable to the participant. Accordingly, the security arrangement described in paragraph (3) above constitutes an assignment of the sort normally proscribed by Code section 401(a)(13)(A).

Code section 401(a)(13)(B), however, provides that an assignment normally proscribed by section 401(a)(13)(A) will be permitted, if the assignment is made pursuant to a domestic relations order which is determined to be a QDRO. Whether a domestic relations order is a QDRO is determined under section 414(p) of the Code.

The Martial Settlement Agreement that is part of the Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage is a domestic relations order which has assigned to an alternate payee Spouse B, as security for her share in the martial property, a security interest in the remaining portion of the benefits payable under Plan X with respect to Taxpayer A, pursuant to a QDRO that is not yet drafted. You have represented that you will seek to enter, as the QDRO required by the Martial Settlement Agreement, an order, which incorporates inter alia the terms of the security

200252093

interest, described in paragraph (3). In order to be a QDRO, the order sought must also meet the requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Code section 414(p). Thus, you represent that the order will be (1) a domestic relations order which assigns to an alternate payee a right to receive a portion of a participant's plan benefit, and (2) an order which meets the terms of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Code section 414(p).

Accordingly, the security interest described in paragraph (3) above constitutes an assignment which will be incorporated in a QDRO. Because it will be an assignment of a right pursuant to a QDRO, it will be an assignment that is permitted under Code section 401(a)(13)(B).

Accordingly, we rule that the creation of the security interest in Taxpayer A’s interest in Plan X, as described in paragraph (3) above, will be an assignment permitted pursuant to Code section 401(a)(13)(B).

This ruling is premised on the assumption that the order incorporating the terms of paragraph (3) above will be determined to be a QDRO.

This ruling is further premised on the assumption that Plan X is qualified under Code section 401(a), and that the related trust is tax-exempt under Code section 501(a), at all times relevant to the transactions described above.

This ruling expresses no opinion regarding the qualified status of Plan X under Code section 401(a)(13)(B) upon the distribution of $ [redacted] from the Plan to the Spouse B, pursuant to paragraph (1) above.

The original of this letter has been sent to your authorized representative in accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office.

If you or your authorized representative have any questions with regard to this

letter, please contact

Sincerely yours,

Alan Pipkin

Employee Plans, Technical Group 4

Enclosures:

Deleted copy of letter ruling
Form 437

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace