PLR 200251020: Pension plan receives a conditional funding waiver for 2001

Number
200251020
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
September 24, 2002
Publicly released
December 20, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard for a company's defined benefit pension plan for the year ended December 31, 2001. A new actuary had reported a much larger funding deficiency than the company had previously been told to expect. The company froze benefit accruals, raised prices, and planned expense reductions; the plan's assets covered 68 percent of its current liability at the start of 2001. The waiver required timely minimum funding contributions for the 2002 and 2003 plan years without further waivers. If that condition was not met, the waiver would become retroactively void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the plan receive a waiver of its 2001 minimum funding standard?
  • Outcome: approved, subject to timely 2002 and 2003 contributions
  • Key authorities: IRC § 412(d), (c)(10), and (f); ERISA §§ 303 and 304(b)

Full text (IRS public release)

200251020

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
SEP 24 2002

UIL: 412.06-00
[illegible handwritten notation]

In re:

Company =

This letter constitutes notice that with respect to the above-named defined benefit pension plan we have granted a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ended December 31, 2001.

This conditional waiver for the plan year ended December 31, 2001, has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The waived amount is the contribution which would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account to zero as of the end of the plan year for which this conditional waiver has been granted.

The Company has a calendar year fiscal year. Cumulatively, from 1998 through 2001, the Company had de minimus net profits. Near the end of 2001, the Company was first informed by the new enrolled actuary for the Pension Plan (who had taken over the Pension Plan beginning with the 2001 plan year) that the plan had a significantly larger funding deficiency than the deficiency that had been reported by the prior enrolled actuary for the plan, and that the minimum funding contribution for the plan year ending December 31, 2001, would be substantially higher than it had been in previous years. Note that the other information available to the Company was not sufficient for it to determine the magnitude of the funding deficiency.

To effect a recovery, and to be able to meet the minimum funding requirements for future plan years, the Company has frozen benefit accruals under the Pension Plan, instituted price increases, and is developing programs to reduce expenses through the closure of marginal profit centers and the institution of policies and procedures to curtail future capital expenditures.

200251020

2

As of January 1, 2001, the value of the assets of the plan was equal to 68% of the plan's current liability. Because the prospects for recovery are uncertain and because the plan is under-funded, we are granting this waiver subject to the following condition:

The contributions required to satisfy the minimum funding standard for the plan years ending December 31, 2002 and 2003, are to be timely made as defined in section 412(c)(10) of the Code (without a waiver being granted for such years).

If this condition is not satisfied, the waiver is retroactively null and void. You agreed to this condition in a letter dated August 26, 2002.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA which describe the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized. Please note that any amendment to other retirement plans maintained by the company or to the company’s profit sharing plan, to increase the liabilities of those plans would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year ended December 31, 2001, the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney (Form 2848) on file. A copy of this letter has also been sent to the Manager, Employee Plans Classification in A copy of this letter should be furnished to the enrolled actuary for the plan.

If you have any questions on this ruling letter, please contact

Sincerely,

[signature]
James E. Holland, Jr., Manager
Employee Plans Technical

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace