CCA 200251007: IRS may correct injured spouse refund allocations

Number
200251007
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Cases of Bankruptcy
Code sections
§ 6402
Ruling dated
September 17, 2002
Publicly released
December 20, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer in bankruptcy and her spouse filed joint returns showing refunds, and the taxpayer submitted injured spouse allocation forms. The allocations conflicted with the joint returns and the method in a published IRS revenue ruling. Chief Counsel advised that the IRS was not bound by the amounts entered on those forms. It should calculate each spouse's share of the overpayments under the revenue ruling's allocation method. This matters because only one spouse's share of a joint refund can be applied to that spouse's separate debt.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Must the IRS accept injured spouse refund allocations that conflict with its published allocation method?
  • Outcome: advice given; the IRS may recalculate the allocations
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6402(a); Rev. Rul. 80-7; Rev. Rul. 74-611

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL
September 17, 2002

Number: 200251007
GL-133061-02
Release Date: 12/20/2002
CC:PA:APJP
UILC: 6402.01-03

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE LEGAL ADVICE

MEMORANDUM FOR MICHAEL J. O’BRIEN
ASSOCIATE AREA COUNSEL (SB/SE)
CC:SB:6:OKL

FROM: John J. McGreevy
Senior Advisor
CC:PA:APJP

SUBJECT: Request for Legal Advice Regarding Injured Spouse Claims

This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your memorandum dated July 1, 2002. In accordance with I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3), this Chief Counsel Advice should not be cited as precedent.

LEGEND

Taxpayer/Debtor =

Tax Year 1 =

Tax Year 2 =

Date 1
=

ISSUE

Whether the Service is bound by Taxpayer’s allocations as submitted on Form 8379, Injured Spouse Claim and Allocation, when the allocations are not consistent with the guidelines for determining the amount of relief provided in Rev. Rul. 80-7, 1980-1 C.B. 296.
2
GL-133061-02

CONCLUSION

If Taxpayer’s allocations on Form 8379 are not consistent with the guidelines set forth in Rev. Rul. 80-7, the Service is not bound by them. Therefore, the amount of injured spouse relief should be determined in accordance with Rev. Rul. 80-7.

FACTS

Taxpayer (Debtor) filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition, which was subsequently converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding. Thereafter, Debtor and her non- petitioning spouse filed joint Forms 1040 federal income tax returns for Tax Years 1 and 2, reflecting income tax refunds for both years. Although the Service attempted to obtain Debtor’s agreement to offset her post-petition income tax refunds against her pre-petition income tax liabilities, Debtor did not agree to the offset. On Date 1, Debtor filed Forms 8379 requesting her portion of the refunds for Tax Years 1 and 2.

You have indicated that Debtor’s allocations on the Forms 8379 are inconsistent with the information submitted on the joint Forms 1040 for those years, as well as the provisions of Rev. Rul. 80-7.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 6402(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) provides that in the case of any overpayment, the Secretary, within the applicable period of limitations, may credit the amount of the overpayment, including any interest allowed thereon, against any liability in respect of an internal revenue tax on the part of the person who made the overpayment, and shall refund any balance to such person.

Rev. Rul. 74-611, 1974-2 C.B. 399, provides that when a husband and wife file a joint return, each spouse has a separate interest in the jointly reported income and a separate interest in any overpayment.

Injured spouse relief applies when a couple files jointly and their tax refund is reduced or eliminated because of an unpaid tax liability or other debt that only one of them owes. The injured spouse has a right to his/her share of the refund, based on an allocation between the spouses of income, deductions, payments, and other tax return items. Accordingly, Rev. Rul. 80-7 provides that if spouses file a joint return showing an overpayment, the amount that may be credited to one spouse’s separate liability is computed by subtracting that spouse’s share of the joint liability from his/her contribution toward the joint liability. The amount credited may not exceed that of the joint overpayment. 3 GL-133061-02

Section 21.4.6.4.11.1 of the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) provides that items of income, deductions, and exemptions shall be allocated as determined by the taxpayer on Form 8379, or as reported on the original return to arrive at the taxable income for each spouse in accordance with Rev. Rul. 80-7.

Although the IRM states that the Service should compute the amount of injured spouse relief based on allocations submitted by Debtor, the provision makes reference to the guidelines for determining the amount of relief set forth in Rev. Rul. 80-7. Therefore, if Debtor’s allocations on Forms 8379 are inconsistent with those guidelines, the Service is not bound by her allocations. Accordingly, Debtor’s allocable share of the overpayments should be computed according to the method provided in Rev. Rul. 80-7.

This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this writing may have an adverse effect on privileges, such as the attorney client privilege. If disclosure becomes necessary, please contact this office for our views.

If you have any further questions, please contact our office at (202) 622-4910.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace