PLR 200250011: Extra time granted for dual consolidated loss filings

Number
200250011
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other; Dual Resident Corporation
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
September 9, 2002
Publicly released
December 13, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporate taxpayer missed required elections, agreements, and annual certifications under the dual consolidated loss regulations. Its tax preparer had concluded the statements were unnecessary, and the taxpayer said it relied on that preparer. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the standards for relief from a missed regulatory election deadline. It gave the taxpayer 30 days from the ruling date to file the specified statements for the affiliates and years in the attached schedule. The extension did not decide whether the taxpayer otherwise qualified to make those filings.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer file the specified dual consolidated loss statements after their due dates?
  • Outcome: approved; a 30-day extension was granted
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200250011
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 12/13/2002
ndex Number : 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-164516-01
Date:
September 9, 2002

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=

Individual A
=

Individual B
=

CPA Firm
=

Dear
:

This replies to your letter dated November 7, 2001, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the election and agreement described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) and the annual certification described in § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(vi)(B) in accordance with “Schedule A”, which is attached to and made part of this ruling letter. Supplemental information was submitted in a letter dated May 16, 2002. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

Individual A is a partner in CPA Firm and has been responsible for the preparation of the consolidated tax returns of Taxpayer and its members for the tax years at issue. The affidavit of Individual A describes the circumstances that led Individual A to conclude that Taxpayer was not required to file the statements described in § 1.1503- 2(g)(2) for these tax years. Individual B is the vice president of Taxpayer. The affidavit of Individual B indicates that Taxpayer relied upon Individual A and CPA Firm to

2

In re: PLR-164516-01

properly prepare Taxpayer’s consolidated tax returns for the tax years at issue.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the statements described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2) are regulatory elections as defined in § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100–1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the election and agreement described in
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) and the annual certification described in § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) in accordance with “Schedule A”.

As provided in § 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the statements described in
§ 1.1503-(2)(g)(2).

The ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the statements described in
§ 1.1503-(2)(g)(2).

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney submitted with your request for relief, a copy of this

3

In re: PLR-164516-01

ruling letter is being furnished to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,
/s/ Allen Goldstein
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

Attachment
Schedule A

cc:

4

In re: PLR-164516-01

“SCHEDULE A”

An extension of time has been requested to file the election and agreement provided under §1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to the following affiliates for each of the tax years ended as indicated below:

An extension of time has been requested to file the annual certification provided under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) with respect to the following affiliates for each of the tax years ended as indicated below:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace