PLR 200248028: Conditional minimum funding waiver for a pension plan in bankruptcy

Number
200248028
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
September 5, 2002
Publicly released
November 29, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company in Chapter 11 bankruptcy had a defined benefit pension plan whose assets were 80 percent of current liabilities at the start of 2001. The IRS granted a conditional waiver of the plan's minimum funding standard for the plan year ending December 31, 2001. The company must make the required 2002 and 2003 plan contributions on time without waivers for those years, and its reorganization plan must provide for this waiver. If either condition fails, the waiver is retroactively void. The letter also points to restrictions on plan amendments while the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the underfunded plan receive a minimum funding waiver for its 2001 plan year?
  • Outcome: Approved conditionally; failure of either stated condition voids the waiver retroactively.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(d), 412(c)(10), 412(f); ERISA §§ 303, 304(b).

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00

200248028

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION

SEP 05 2002

T:EP:RA:T:A1

In re:

Dear [redacted]:

This letter constitutes notice that with respect to the above-named defined benefit pension plan we have granted a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ended December 31, 2001.

This conditional waiver for the plan year ended December 31, 2001, has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The waived amount is the contribution which would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account to zero as of the end of the plan year for which this conditional waiver has been granted.

The company has a June 30 fiscal year end. The Company had negative earnings from 1998 through 2001, primarily due to decreased sales caused by the contraction of the manufacturing sector. At the fiscal year end of June 30, 2001, the Company had negative net worth.

In 2001 the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The company expects to emerge from bankruptcy with a restructuring of debt and an infusion of capital. The company has implemented cost cutting measures, exited from unprofitable businesses and has implemented price increases. However, the outlook for recovery is still uncertain.

200248028

As of January 1, 2001, the value of the assets of the plan was equal to 80% of the plan's current liability. Because the prospects for recovery are uncertain and the plan is under-funded, we are granting this waiver subject to the following conditions:

(1) The contributions required to satisfy the minimum funding standard for the plan years ending December 31, 2002 and 2003, are to be timely made as defined in section 412(c)(10) of the Code (without a waiver being granted for such years).

(2) The plan of reorganization will contain language providing for this conditional waiver.

If either of these conditions are not satisfied, the waiver is retroactively null and void. You agreed to these conditions in a letter dated August 2, 2002.

Nothing in this letter precludes a request for a modification of these conditions. Please note that should such a request be made, a new user fee will be required, and that the facts and circumstances at the time of such request as well as the facts and circumstances at the time of the initial request will be considered.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA which describe the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized. Please note that any amendment to other retirement plans maintained by the company or to the company’s profit sharing plan, to increase the liabilities of those plans would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year ended December 31, 2001, the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). A copy of this letter is being sent to the Manager, Employee Plans Classification in

A copy of this letter should be furnished to the enrolled actuary for the plan.

200248028

If you have any questions on this ruling letter, please contact

Sincerely,

Norman Greenberg
Acting Manager, Actuarial Group 1

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace