PLR 200246028: Late application to change tax year treated as timely filed

Number
200246028
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Section 442; Accounting Periods
Code sections
§ 442, § 6110
Ruling dated
August 16, 2002
Publicly released
November 15, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation filed Form 1128 late to request a change from a June 30 tax year to a 52 to 53 week year ending near January 31. The filing was within 90 days of its due date, and the company attributed the delay to an error or misunderstanding. The IRS found that the corporation acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It granted an extension under Treasury Regulation section 301.9100-3 and treated the Form 1128 as timely filed. The IRS expressly left the decision on whether the requested tax year change was permitted to the service center.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the late Form 1128 receive an extension so it would count as timely filed?
  • Outcome: Approved: filing relief granted; eligibility for the tax year change was not decided.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 442; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.442-1(b)(1), 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2000-11.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200246028
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date:11/15/2002
Index Nos.: 9100.09-00
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:4 PLR-138664-02
Date:
August 16, 2002

EIN:

Dear
:

This is in reference to a Form 1128, Application to Adopt, Change, or Retain a Tax Year, submitted on behalf of the above-named taxpayer, requesting permission to change its accounting period, for federal income tax purposes, from a taxable year ending June 30, to a 52-53 week taxable year ending on the Saturday nearest to
January 31, effective
The taxpayer has requested that the Form
1128 be considered timely filed under the authority contained in § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations.

The taxpayer's Form 1128 was due on or before The information furnished indicates that the application for the change in accounting period was filed late because of an error or misunderstanding. However, the form was filed within 90 days of the due date.

Rev. Proc. 2000-11, 2000-3 I.R.B. 309, provides procedures by which certain corporations may obtain automatic approval to change their annual accounting periods under § 442 of the Internal Revenue Code. A corporation complying with all the applicable provisions of this revenue procedure has obtained the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service to change its annual accounting period under § 442 and the Income Tax Regulations thereunder. Section 6.02(1) of Rev. Proc. 2000-11 provides that a Form 1128 filed pursuant to this revenue procedure will be considered timely filed for purposes of § 1.442-1(b)(1) only if it is filed on or before the time (including extensions) for filing the return for the short period required to effect such change. As noted above, the taxpayer’s Form 1128 was not timely filed.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions), such as the instant case, must be made under the rules of § 301.9100-3. Requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to

2

establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, it is held that the taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief have been satisfied in this case, and the taxpayer's late filed Form 1128 requesting permission to change to a 52-53 week taxable year ending on the Saturday nearest to January 31, effective February 2, 2002, is considered timely filed.

The application indicates that the taxpayer qualifies under Rev. Proc. 2000-11, 2000-1 C.B. 309. Since changes in accounting period under Rev. Proc. 2000-11 are under the jurisdiction of the Director, Internal Revenue Service Center where the taxpayer’s returns are filed, we have forwarded the application to the Director, Kansas City Service Center. Any further communication regarding this matter should be directed to the Service Center.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as part of an examination process.

This ruling addresses the granting of § 301.9100-3 relief only. No opinion is expressed regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable thereto, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction. Specifically, no opinion is expressed as to whether the taxpayer is permitted under the Code and applicable regulations to change to the tax year requested in the subject Form 1128.

In accordance with the provisions of a power of attorney currently on file, we are sending a copy of this letter ruling to the taxpayer’s authorized representatives.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,
Robert A. Berkovsky
Branch Chief
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax and Accounting)
Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace