CCA 200245038: IRS denies proposed depreciation method for gas utility assets
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A gas utility filed Form 3115 seeking to change how it depreciated certain distribution facility assets. The IRS advised the industry director that consent for the method change had been denied. Although the utility believed its prior depreciation treatment under former section 168 was wrong, the proposed method also used erroneous recovery periods, methods, and conventions. The memorandum explains the former recovery property and public utility asset classification rules that control the treatment.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the utility receive consent to use its proposed depreciation method for gas distribution assets?
- Outcome: Denied. The proposed method used erroneous recovery periods, methods, and conventions.
- Key authorities: Former IRC §§ 167(m), 168; Treas. Reg. § 1.167(a)-11; Rev. Proc. 83-35.
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
August 5, 2002
Number: 200245038
Release Date: 11/8/2002
UIL: 168.20-00
CC:PSI:6
446.04-17
FREV-249604-96
MEMORANDUM FOR: INDUSTRY DIRECTOR, NATURAL RESOURCES AND
CONSTRUCTION (LM:NRC)
FROM: CHIEF, BRANCH 6 (CC:PSI:6)
PASSTHROUGHS AND SPECIAL INDUSTRIES
SUBJECT: DENIAL OF CONSENT FOR CHANGE IN
ACCOUNTING METHOD
In accordance with section 8.07(2)(a) of Rev. Proc. 2002-1, 2001-1 I.R.B. 1, 34, this Chief Counsel Advice advises you that consent for a change in accounting method has been denied to a taxpayer within your jurisdiction. Pursuant to § 6110 (k)(3), this Chief Counsel Advise is not to be cited as precedent.
LEGEND:
Taxpayer =
Utility =
Date =
Taxpayer filed the Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, to request permission to change its method of computing depreciation for certain assets relating to its gas utility distribution facilities under Rev. Proc. 96-31, 1996-1 C.B. 714. Because this change was under an automatic revenue procedure, Taxpayer may have already made this change.
Taxpayer was a utility involved in the distribution of natural gas. Subsequent to the filing of the Form 3115, Taxpayer merged into Utility. Taxpayer, previously included certain items of property in asset class 49.21, Gas Utility Distribution Facilities, under Rev. Proc. 83-35, 1983-1 C. B. 745. Taxpayer believes that these items of property were erroneously depreciated under the depreciation system of former § 168. However, Taxpayer’s proposed method to depreciate these items of property is also erroneous. 2 FREV-249604-96
Former § 168 (ACRS) generally applies to recovery property placed in service after 1980 and before 1987. The term “recovery property” is defined in former § 168(c)(1) as meaning tangible property of a character subject to the allowance for depreciation that is used in a trade or business, or held for the production of income. Recovery property does not include public utility property if the taxpayer does not use a normalization method of accounting.
Pursuant to former § 168(c)(2), each item of recovery property is assigned to one of the classes of property specified in former § 168(c)(2). The term “5-year property” is defined in former § 168(c)(2)(B) as meaning recovery property that is § 1245 class property and that is not 3-year property, 10-year property, or 15-year public utility property. The classification of recovery property as 15-year public utility property means public utility property (other than § 1250 class property or 3-year property) with a present class life of more than 25 years.
The term "class life" is defined in former § 168(g)(2) as meaning the class life (if any) that would be applicable with respect to any property as of January 1, 1981, under
§ 167(m) (determined without regard to § 167(m)(4) and as if the taxpayer had made an election under § 167(m)). Former § 167(m) provided that in the case of a taxpayer who elected the asset depreciation range (ADR) system of depreciation, the depreciation allowance was based on the class life prescribed by the Secretary that reasonably reflected the anticipated useful life of that class of property to the industry or other group.
Section 1.167(a)-11(b)(4)(iii)(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides rules for classifying property under former § 167(m). Property is included in the asset guideline class for the activity in which the property is primarily used.
The present class lives of recovery property for purposes of former § 168 are set forth in Rev. Proc. 83-35. This revenue procedure divides assets into two broad categories: (1) asset classes 00.11 through 00.4, which consist of specific depreciable assets used in all business activities; and (2) asset classes 01.1 through 80.0 that consist of depreciable assets used in specific business activities.
Under the depreciation system of former § 168, pursuant to former § 168(b)(1), 15-year public utility property generally is depreciated by using a 15-year recovery period and the applicable percentage table in lieu of a particular depreciation method and convention. Under § 168(b)(3), however, a taxpayer could elect to use a longer recovery period, the straight line method of accounting, and the half-year convention. 3 FREV-249604-96
Taxpayer’s business activity is described in gas utility asset class 49.21 of Rev. Proc. 83-35. Taxpayer does not represent that any elections were made for the property subject to the Form 3115. Accordingly, Taxpayer’s proposed method of accounting uses erroneous recovery periods, depreciation methods, and conventions to depreciate the property.
The method changes would have been effective with the taxable year beginning Date and would have resulted in a negative § 481(a) adjustment/decrease in taxable income.
If you have any questions on this matter, do not hesitate to call me at (202) 622-3110.
_______
CHARLES B. RAMSEY
Chief, Branch 6
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace