PLR 200243043: Extension granted for dual consolidated loss filings
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A taxpayer used losses from two entities on its U.S. consolidated returns but missed related agreements and annual certifications required by the dual consolidated loss regulations. It requested relief before the IRS discovered the omissions and submitted an affidavit from a tax partner at the firm responsible for its returns. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the good faith and no prejudice standards for discretionary relief. It granted 30 days from the letter date to file the specified agreements and certifications. The IRS did not decide whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible to make those filings.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the taxpayer file late dual consolidated loss agreements and annual certifications?
- Outcome: Approved: a 30-day filing extension, without a ruling on other eligibility requirements.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Number: 200243043
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/25/2002
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Telephone Number:
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-164897-01
Date:
July 31, 2002
LEGEND
Taxpayer
=
Entity A
=
Entity B
=
Dates 1, 2, 3
=
Individual A
=
CPA Firm
=
Dear
:
This replies to your letters dated November 9, 2001, requesting that Taxpayer be granted an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the election and agreement provided under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to Entity A for the tax years ended on Date 1 and Date 2; and with respect to Entity B for the tax year ended on Date 3; and to file the annual certification provided under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) with respect to Entity A for the tax year ended on Date 2 with respect to the dual consolidated loss incurred in the tax year ended on Date 1, and for the tax year ended on Date 3 with respect to the dual consolidated losses incurred in the tax years ended on Dates 1 and 2. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.
2
In re: PLR-164897-01
The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.
Entity A generated a net operating loss in the tax years ended on Date 1 and Date 2. Entity B generated a net operating loss in the tax year ended on Date 3. These losses were taken into account for U.S. federal income tax purposes. CPA Firm was responsible for preparing and signing the U.S. consolidated federal income tax returns for Taxpayer for the years ended on Dates 1, 2, and 3.
Individual A is a tax partner in CPA Firm. The affidavit of Individual A and the facts submitted describe the circumstances that led to the failure to file the agreements and annual certifications. Taxpayer is requesting relief before the failure to file the agreements and annual certifications as required by § 1.1503-2(g)(2) has been discovered by the Internal Revenue Service.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
In the present situation, the agreements and annual certifications are regulatory elections as defined in § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).
Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the election and agreement provided under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to Entity A for the tax years ended on Date 1 and
3
In re: PLR-164897-01
Date 2; and with respect to Entity B for the tax year ended on Date 3; and to file the annual certification provided under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) with respect to Entity A for the tax year ended on Date 2 with respect to the dual consolidated loss incurred in the tax year ended on Date 1, and for the tax year ended on Date 3 with respect to the dual consolidated losses incurred in the tax years ended on Dates 1 and 2.
The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the agreements and annual certifications. § 301.9100-1(a). A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the agreements and annual certifications.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being furnished to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
/s/Allen Goldstein
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace