PLR 200240046: Extension granted to file dual consolidated loss agreements

Number
200240046
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
July 1, 2002
Publicly released
October 4, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer failed to attach required agreements for an entity's dual consolidated losses to returns for four tax years. It sought relief before the IRS discovered the omissions and supplied affidavits explaining what happened. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the good faith and no prejudice standards for an extension under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. It granted 30 days from the ruling date to file the agreements. The IRS did not decide whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible to file them.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer file the dual consolidated loss agreements after the original deadlines?
  • Outcome: Approved a 30-day extension.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200240046
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/4/2002
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-154868-01
Date:
July 1, 2002

In re:

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=

Entity
=

Tax years ended 1, 2, 3, 4 =

Individuals A, B and C =

External Tax Advisor =

Dear :

This replies to a letter dated September 14, 2001, in which Taxpayer requests an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the agreement described in
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i) with respect to each dual consolidated loss of Entity incurred in tax years ended 1, 2, 3, and 4 (“the agreements”). The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

2

In re: PLR-154868-01

Individual A is the former Vice President of Taxes for Taxpayer and was involved in the preparation of Taxpayer’s tax returns for the tax years ended 1 through 4. Individual B is a partner with External Tax Advisor and, together with his staff, were engaged to review Taxpayer’s consolidated tax returns for the tax years ended 1 and 4. Individual C is a tax partner with External Tax Advisor and during June of was asked by Taxpayer to assist in preparing a request for a closing agreement under § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(iv)(B)(2) with respect to the dual consolidated losses of Entity. The affidavits of Individuals A, B and C, and the facts submitted describe the circumstances that led to the failure to file the agreements. Taxpayer is requesting relief before the failure to attach the required agreements to Taxpayer’s tax returns for the tax years at issue was discovered by the IRS.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the agreement is a regulatory election as defined in
§ 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under
§ 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the agreement described in § 1.1503- 2(g)(2)(i) with respect to each dual consolidated loss of Entity incurred in tax years ended 1, 2, 3, and 4.

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the agreements. § 301.9100-1(a). A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the agreements.

3

In re: PLR-154868-01

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of the ruling letter is being furnished to Taxpayer and to the other authorized representative.

Sincerely,

/s/ Allen Goldstein
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace