PLR 200240045: Time extended for dual consolidated loss elections and certifications

Number
200240045
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Other
Code sections
§ 1503
Ruling dated
June 28, 2002
Publicly released
October 4, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer reported losses from two foreign hybrid entity units on its U.S. returns but omitted the related dual consolidated loss elections and annual certifications. Its tax adviser supplied affidavits about the omissions, and the taxpayer sought relief before the IRS discovered them. The IRS found that the taxpayer met the good faith and no prejudice requirements of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. It granted 30 days from the ruling date to file the elections and certifications for the stated tax years. It did not decide whether the taxpayer was otherwise eligible to file them.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer file missed dual consolidated loss elections and annual certifications?
  • Outcome: Approved a 30-day extension.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B), and 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200240045
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 10/4/2002
Index Number: 9100.22-00
Person to Contact:
1503.04-04
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:PLR-162215-01
Date:
June 28, 2002

LEGEND

Taxpayer
=

Entity A
=

Entity B
=

Dates 1, 2, 3, 4
=

Individual A
=

CPA Firm
=

Dear
:

This replies to your letter dated November 9, 2001, requesting that Taxpayer be granted an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to file the necessary elections under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), and the annual certifications required under
§ 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) with respect to the dual consolidated losses incurred by Entities A and B during the tax years ended on Dates 1, 2, 3 and 4. The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as a part of the audit process.

2

In re: PLR-162215-01

Entities A and B became hybrid entity separate units as defined in § 1.1503-2(c)(4) as of the beginning of the tax year ended on Date 1.

Entity A incurred net operating losses during each tax year ended on Dates 1, 2, 3 and 4, and these losses were included in the tax returns of Taxpayer. Entity B incurred a net operating loss during the tax year ended on Date 1, and such loss was included in Taxpayer’s tax return for the tax year ended on Date 1.

Individual A is a partner in CPA Firm, and the tax partner on Taxpayer’s account. Individual A was responsible for the preparation, review and filing of the U.S. tax returns of Taxpayer, which included its foreign subsidiaries Entities A and B. This responsibility included filing elections, statements, certifications and other attachments with the appropriate U.S. tax returns of Taxpayer for the tax years ended on Dates 1, 2, 3 and 4. The affidavits of Individual A and others together with the facts submitted describe the circumstances that led to the failure to file the elections and annual certifications. Taxpayer is requesting relief before the Internal Revenue Service has discovered Taxpayer’s failure to file the elections and annual certifications as required by § 1.1503-2(g)(2).

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election and annual certification are regulatory elections as defined in § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the rules set forth in § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time until 30 days from the date of this ruling letter to file the necessary elections under §

3

In re: PLR-162215-01

1.1503-2(g)(2)(i), and the annual certifications required under § 1.1503-2(g)(2)(vi)(B) with respect to the dual consolidated losses incurred by Entities A and B during the tax years ended on Dates 1, 2, 3 and 4.

The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to file the elections and annual certifications. § 301.9100-1(a). A copy of this ruling letter should be associated with the elections and annual certifications.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

No ruling has been requested, and none is expressed, as to the application of any other section of the Code or regulations to the facts presented.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being furnished to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

/s/ Allen Goldstein
Allen Goldstein
Reviewer
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace