PLR 200238031: Irish reinsurer qualifies for treaty excise tax relief

Number
200238031
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Ireland
Topics
Code sections
§ 4371
Ruling dated
May 28, 2002
Publicly released
September 20, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An Irish reinsurer sought a ruling and closing agreement about U.S. excise tax on premiums for U.S. risks. The IRS found that the reinsurer met the active business requirements of the U.S.–Ireland income tax convention and that its U.S. reinsurance premiums were connected with its Irish business. The letter says premiums paid to the reinsurer from the redacted effective date may be treated as exempt from the section 4371 tax under the convention. The relief is tied to the enclosed agreement, including a letter of credit requirement. The IRS did not decide whether the taxpayer was an insurance company or whether its premiums were deductible.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Do the Irish reinsurer's U.S. premiums qualify for treaty relief from the insurance excise tax?
  • Outcome: Approved under the treaty and closing agreement terms
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4371; U.S.–Ireland income tax convention Art. 23(3) and Protocol ¶ 9(b)(i)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200238031
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 9/20/2002
Index Number: 9114.03-19
Person to Contact:

Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:Br1-PLR-163028-01
Date:
May 28, 2002

Taxpayer =

TY:

Dear
:

This responds to your letter dated November 14, 2001, in which you requested a ruling and closing agreement that premiums received by Taxpayer on policies of insurance or reinsurance of United States risks are exempt from the insurance excise tax imposed by section 4371 of the Internal Revenue Code pursuant to the Income Tax Convention between the United States and the Government of Ireland (“Convention”).

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of this request for a ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

Taxpayer, a reinsurance company that is a resident of Ireland, represents that it is engaged in an active trade or business in Ireland and that the premium income it receives from U.S. insureds, none of whom are related to Taxpayer, is derived in connection with, or is incidental to, that trade or business. Therefore, Taxpayer contends that it qualifies for benefits under Article 23(3) of the Convention.

Article 23(3)(a) of the Convention provides that a person who is not a “qualified person” under paragraph (2) may nevertheless qualify for benefits under the Convention
with respect to an item of income derived from the other State, if:

(i) such resident is engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business in 2

the first-mentioned State (other than the business of making or managing investments, unless such business is carried out by a bank or insurance company acting in the ordinary course of its business), and

(ii) the item of income is connected with or incidental to the trade or business in the first-mentioned State, provided that, where such item of income is connected with a trade or business in the first-mentioned State and such resident has an ownership interest in the activity in the other State that generated the income, the trade or business is substantial in relation to the activity.

Paragraph 9(b)(i) of the Protocol to the Convention states that whether a resident is engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business will be determined on the basis of an analysis of all relevant facts and circumstances but that

[i]n any case, . . .

(B) an insurance company will be considered to be engaged in the active conduct of a trade or business if its gross income consists primarily of insurance or reinsurance premiums and investment income attributable to such premiums.

Taxpayer meets the requirements of Article 23(3)(a) of the Convention and paragraph 9(b)(i) of the Protocol.

Further, to be entitled to benefits under the Convention, the item of income derived from the other State must be “connected with or incidental to the trade or business in the first-mentioned State. . . .” Pursuant to Article 23(3)(b)(ii) of the Convention, an item of income meets this requirement if the activity “[t]hat generated the item of income is a line of business that forms a part of or is complementary to the trade or business conducted in the” other State. The receipt of insurance and reinsurance premiums from the United States is “complementary” to Taxpayer’s insurance business in Ireland. Thus, Taxpayer qualifies for benefits under Article 23(3)(b) of the Convention with respect to reinsurance premiums it receives from persons in the United States.

Pursuant to paragraph 8(a) of the enclosed agreement, Taxpayer’s liability for Federal excise tax, as agreed upon, including liability resulting from reinsurance of U.S. risks with persons not entitled to exemption under the Convention or another Convention, will
commence on
. The letter of credit required by paragraph 5(a) of
the enclosed agreement, in the amount of $ , must be in effect within 30 days of the date the agreement is finally signed on the Commissioner’s behalf.

Any person otherwise required to remit the Federal excise tax on foreign insurance or reinsurance policies issued by Taxpayer pursuant to section 46.4371-1(a) of the Excise Tax Regulations may rely upon a copy of this letter and/or a copy of the approved 3

Closing Agreement as authority that they may consider premiums paid to Taxpayer on
and after
, as exempt under the Convention from the United States
Federal excise tax.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. Furthermore, no opinion is expressed on the issue of whether Taxpayer is an insurance company or whether premiums paid to Taxpayer are deductible under section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent by any other taxpayer.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

W. Edward Williams
Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(International)

Enclosure (1)

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace