CCA 200237004: IPO investors and target owners meet section 351 control test
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation planned an initial public offering alongside mergers to acquire twelve operating businesses. The target shareholders would transfer stock, and public investors would contribute cash, in exchange for stock of the acquiring company and some cash. Chief Counsel agreed that the target shareholders and IPO investors together acquired enough of the company's stock to satisfy section 351's control requirement. It treated the public investors as transferring cash directly to the company, disregarding the underwriter for this purpose. The advice also agreed that the mergers did not qualify under a separate reorganization rule because too much consideration was other than stock.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Do the IPO and related acquisitions satisfy section 351's control requirement?
- Outcome: Advice: yes, counting target shareholders and public investors together
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 351, 368(c); Treas. Reg. § 1.351-1(a)(3)
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
I N T E R N AL R E V E N U E S E R V I C E WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
OFFICE OF
CHIEF COUNSEL
May 30, 2002
Number: 200237004
Release Date: 9/13/2002
CC:CORP:BR:06
PostF-151723-01
UILC: 351.00-00
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE LEGAL ADVICE
MEMORANDUM FOR
Associate Area Counsel (Large and Mid-size Business) CC:LM:HMT:NEW:2
FROM: William D. Alexander
Acting Associate Chief Counsel CC:CORP
SUBJECT: Section 351 Control
This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your memorandum dated May 10, 2002. In accordance with I.R.C. § 6110(k)(3), this Chief Counsel Advice should not be cited as precedent.
LEGEND
Target =
Year 1 =
Date 1 =
#a =
#b =
#c =
State A =
Business 1 =
Business 2 =
2
PostF-151723-01
ISSUE
- Whether the target acquisitions by Acquiring as well as the related IPO of
Acquiring stock meet the “control” requirement of I.R.C. § 351.
FACTS
Acquirer was founded in Year 1 as a State A corporation. Its goal was to become a leading consolidator and operator of Business 1 and Business 2. Pursuant to a plan of acquisition contained in its Date 1 SEC prospectus, Acquirer sought to engage in a series of transactions whereby Target 1 and eleven (11) other independent Business 1 and related companies would, through reorganization, become subsidiaries of Acquirer.
The consummation of an IPO was to be contemporaneous and contingent upon the closing of twelve separate merger agreements between temporary transitory subsidiaries of Acquirer, formed for the purpose of this reorganization, and the twelve operating companies including Target. The subsidiaries would merge into the operating target companies, with the targets surviving as twelve separate subsidiaries of Acquirer. The approximate values of the eleven other companies, all smaller than Target 1, ranged from #a to #b. None of the above transactions qualified under I.R.C. § 368(a)(2)(E) because 20% or more of the consideration each target received from Acquiring consisted of boot.
Acquirer transferred cash and nearly #c of its equity in the IPO and mergers to the underwriters, public and target owners in exchange for cash and stock of the targets. Transfer of this amount of stock to the various transferors constituted “control” under the provisions of I.R.C. § 368(c).
LAW AND ANALYSIS
You have stated that none of the above acquisitions by Acquiring of Targets 1-12 through the use of merger subsidiaries qualify under I.R.C. § 368(a)(2)(E) because 20% or more of the consideration each target received from Acquiring consisted of boot. We agree with this conclusion.
In addition, you state that the above mentioned target acquisitions by Acquiring as well as the related IPO of Acquiring stock meet the “control” requirement of I.R.C.
§ 351. Under I.R.C. § 351, the shareholders of Targets 1-12 will be treated as transferring all their stock in Targets 1-12 and the public investors in the IPO would be treated as transferring cash in exchange for stock of the Acquiring corporation and cash. Since at least #c of the stock of Acquiring was acquired by the
3
PostF-151723-01
transferors (the individual investors in the IPO and the shareholders of Targets 1- 12) the transaction will meet the “control” requirement of I.R.C. § 351.
In addition, we agree that the public investors in the IPO of Acquiring stock will be treated as if they transferred cash directly to Acquiring in exchange for Acquiring stock. The underwriter will be disregarded for purposes of I.R.C. § 351. See Treas. Reg. § 1. 351-1(a)(3).
Further, when the transferors in a transaction qualifying under I.R.C. § 351 obtain “control” in the transferee (as defined in I.R.C. § 368(c)) no additional continuity of shareholder interest is required. See Rev. Rul. 84-71, 1984-1 C.B. 106. (Continuity of interest is unnecessary in order for a transaction to qualify under I.R.C. § 351 if it meets the other requirements of I.R.C. § 351.)
Please call if you have any further questions.
William D. Alexander
Acting Associate Chief Counsel
By:
ALFRED BISHOP JR.
Branch Chief
Corporate Branch 6
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace