PLR 200236055: Conditional waiver of pension minimum funding standard

Number
200236055
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Minimum Funding Waiver
Code sections
§ 412
Ruling dated
June 21, 2002
Publicly released
September 6, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company sought relief from the minimum funding contribution for its defined benefit pension plan after losses and restructuring. The plan's assets equaled 57 percent of its current liability, and the IRS described the company's recovery prospects as uncertain. The IRS granted a conditional waiver under section 412(d). The company had to make required contributions for later plan years on time and secure the waived amount within twelve months in a manner acceptable to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. The letter said the waiver would be retroactively void if the security condition was not met.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the pension plan receive a waiver of its minimum funding standard for the specified year?
  • Outcome: Approved conditionally, with later contributions and security required
  • Key authorities: IRC § 412(d); ERISA § 303

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0412.06-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

200236055
JUN 21 2002

T:EP:RA:T:A1

In re:

This letter constitutes notice that with respect to the above-named defined benefit pension plan we have granted a conditional waiver of the minimum funding standard for the plan year ended [redacted].

This conditional waiver for the plan year ended [redacted], has been granted in accordance with section 412(d) of the Internal Revenue Code and section 303 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The waived amount is the contribution which would otherwise be required to reduce the balance in the funding standard account to zero as of the end of the plan year for which this conditional waiver has been granted.

The company has a calendar year fiscal year. The Company had negative earnings from [redacted] through [redacted] primarily due to large interest expenses associated with a restructuring that occurred in [redacted]. At the end of [redacted], the Company had negative net worth. In [redacted], the Company underwent another restructuring. This restructuring resulted in a positive net worth position at the end of [redacted] and an extraordinary income gain that enabled the Company to report positive earnings in [redacted]. However, absent the extraordinary income gain, the Company would have a [redacted] consecutive earnings loss in [redacted], primarily due, for that year, to a [redacted] percent decrease in net sales from the levels reported in [redacted].

The [redacted] restructuring enabled the Company to significantly reduce its interest expense, the primary cause of its losses in the [redacted] through [redacted] period. To return net sales to the level reached in [redacted], and thus eliminate the primary cause (absent the extraordinary restructuring gain) of the [redacted] loss, the Company has adopted a two-pronged strategy of increased penetration in existing foreign markets and expansion of its product base in domestic markets. In addition, the Company has undergone a cost-cutting program to reduce selling and administrative costs.

2
200236055

As of [redacted], the value of the assets of the plan was equal to 57% of the plan's current liability. Because the prospects for recovery are uncertain and because the plan is under-funded, we are granting this waiver subject to the following conditions:

(1) The contributions required to satisfy the minimum funding standard for the plan years ending [redacted] and [redacted] are to be timely made as defined in section 412(c)(10) of the Code (without a waiver being granted for such years).

(2) The waiver for the plan year ended [redacted] is to be secured, within twelve months of the date of this letter, in a manner acceptable to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.

If this condition is not satisfied, the waiver is retroactively null and void. You agreed to this condition in a letter dated June 10, 2002.

Your attention is called to section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA which describe the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized. Please note that any amendment to other retirement plans maintained by the company or to the company’s profit sharing plan, to increase the liabilities of those plans would be considered an amendment for purposes of section 412(f) of the Code and section 304(b) of ERISA.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year ended December 31, 2001, the date of this letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a power of attorney (Form 2848) on file. A copy of this letter is also being sent to the Manager, Employee Plans Classification in [redacted]. A copy of this letter should be furnished to the enrolled actuary for the plan.

3
200236055

If you have any questions on this ruling letter, please contact [redacted].

Sincerely,

Carol D. Gold
Director, Employee Plans

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace