PLR 200227023: Water authority qualifies as a political subdivision

Number
200227023
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Political Subdivisions
Code sections
§ 103
Ruling dated
April 2, 2002
Publicly released
July 5, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A state created a public water authority to supply a town's residents and gave it the power to acquire property by eminent domain. The authority asked whether it qualified as a political subdivision and whether its income was subject to federal income tax. The IRS found that it was a division of state or local government with a substantial sovereign power. It ruled that the authority qualified as a political subdivision under the section 103 regulation and that its income was not subject to federal income tax.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the water authority qualify as a political subdivision whose income is exempt from federal income tax?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. § 1.103-1(b); Rev. Rul. 87-2; Rev. Rul. 71-131; Rev. Rul. 71-132

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury

Number: 200227023
Washington, DC 20224
Release Date: 7/5/2002
Person to Contact:
Index Number: 103.02-01
Telephone Number:

Refer Reply To:
CC:TEGE:EOEG:EO2-PLR-164141-01
Date:
04/02/2002

LEGEND

Authority =

State =

Town =

Dear
:

This is in reply to the letter dated November 7, 2001 from your authorized representative, requesting a ruling that Authority is a political subdivision, as defined in Treas. Reg. § 1.103-1(b), and that its income is not subject to federal income tax.

FACTS

The Authority was created pursuant to special legislation by the State general assembly (the “Legislation”) to provide adequate water supplies for all the residents of the Town. The Legislation found that the lack of water adversely affects the welfare, safety and prosperity of the people resident in the Town. To correct these problems the Legislation created the Authority, a public corporation separate and apart from the State and the Town, with the power to acquire, develop, construct, operate and maintain all properties necessary to provide adequate water to the residents of the Town. The powers of the Authority are vested in a board of directors composed of seven members appointed by the Town’s administrator with and after the advice and consent of the local governing body of the Town.

The Legislation gives the Authority the power to acquire any real property through the process of eminent domain. The Authority’s board of directors may exercise their power of eminent domain by an affirmative vote of not less than five directors. The Authority must obtain the consent of the State or of the Town to acquire property owned by the State or Town through the process of eminent domain.
2

LAW AND ANALYSIS

In general, the income of states and their political subdivisions is not subject to federal income tax, in the absence of specific statutory authorization to tax that income. See Rev. Rul. 87-2, 1987-1 C.B. 18; Rev. Rul. 71-131, 1971-1 C.B. 28; Rev. Rul. 71- 132, 1971-1 C.B. 29.

The term “political subdivision” is not defined in the Code. Under §1.103-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations, however, the term “political subdivision” denotes any division of any State or local governmental unit which is a municipal corporation or which has been delegated the right to exercise part of the sovereign power of the unit. In Commissioner v. Shamberg’s Estate, 144 F. 2d 998 (2d Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 323 U.S. 792 (1945) the three recognized sovereign powers are described as the power to tax, the power of eminent domain, and the police power. Section 1.103-1(b) and the Second Circuit in Shamberg require that only “part” of these powers need to be delegated for a division of a state or local government unit to be considered a “political subdivision.” However, the Service has consistently held that if only an insubstantial amount of any or all such sovereign powers are delegated, the entity will fail to qualify as a political subdivision. See Rev. Rul. 77-164, 1977-1 C.B. 20; Rev. Rul. 77-165, 1977-1 C.B. 21; and Philadelphia National Bank v. United States, 81-2 U.S.T.C. paragraph 9821 (3rd Cir. 1981).

The facts and representations submitted show that the Authority is a division of a State or local government that has been granted a substantial power of eminent domain. Therefore, the Authority qualifies as a political subdivision of the State or local governmental unit, and its income is not subject to federal income tax.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

Sincerely yours,
Elizabeth Purcell, Chief
Exempt Organizations
Branch 2
Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities)
Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace