PLR 200224032: Restoration grant set-aside counts when reserved

Number
200224032
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Set-Asides
Code sections
§ 170, § 501, § 509, § 4942, § 4944, § 6110
Ruling dated
March 18, 2002
Publicly released
June 14, 2002

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2002, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2002
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation reserved funds for a matching grant to a public charity restoring a historic site as a museum and visitor center. The charity had to secure matching contributions and obtain the foundation's approval of plans and contracts before the funds could be used. The IRS ruled that the set-aside met the suitability test of IRC § 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) because the matching grant and oversight made delayed payment more useful for the project. Up to the stated amount could count as a qualifying distribution in the year reserved, provided it was paid for the project within 60 months. The ruling also explains how the set-aside must be recorded and included in the foundation's investment return calculation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the foundation count a restoration project set-aside as a qualifying distribution in the year reserved?
  • Outcome: Approved under the suitability test, with payment required within 60 months.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4942(g)(2); Treas. Reg. § 53.4942(a)-3(b); Rev. Rul. 77-7.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, P.N. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

MAR 18 2002
Date:
Contact Person:
Identification Number:
Uniform Issue List: 4942.03-07
Telephone Number:

LEGEND:
M =
N =
P =
x =

Dear Sir or Madam:

We have considered your ruling request dated December 2, 2001, in which you requested approval of a proposed set-aside of M's income under the suitability test of section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code") and section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the Foundation and Similar Excise Taxes Regulations (the "regulations"), and a determination that the amount set aside may be treated as a qualifying distribution in the year in which it is set aside (but not in the year in which actually paid).

M is recognized as exempt from federal income tax as a charitable organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Code, and is classified as a private foundation within the meaning of section 509(a).

M wishes to set aside a grant totaling $ x to N. N is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code, and is classified as a publicly supported organization under section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). No additions to the set-aside are planned.

The purpose of the grant is to restore and renovate an historic site, known as P, which is now owned by N. N has proposed to renovate and restore P (the "Restoration Project"), and to turn it into a museum and visitor's center. . The cost of the Restoration Project is estimated at

$ x.

M's grant is subject to an agreement with N (the "Agreement"). Under the Agreement, M will make a grant of $ x to N to partially fund the costs of the Restoration Project (the "Restoration Grant"). M will disburse the funds to N in a lump sum within 10 business days after the satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Paragraphs 2(a) and 2(b) of the Agreement. Upon receipt of the funds from M, N shall deposit the funds in a separate interest bearing account (the

-2- 200224032

"Project Account"). As the conditions set forth in Paragraphs 2(c) and 2(d) are satisfied, N may make disbursements from the Project Account solely to pay Reimbursable Costs of the Restoration Project.

M's obligation to make the gift to N is subject to the following conditions precedent, detailed in Paragraph 2 of the Agreement:

(a) On or before [illegible], (i) N shall have received eligible matching contributions for the Restoration Project in an amount not less than $ x, and (ii) shall have provided M with evidence satisfactory to M in its sole discretion that such contributions have been received.

(b) On or before [illegible], (i) N shall have submitted to M, and M shall have approved in writing, the drawings, plans, and specifications for the Restoration Project (collectively, the “Plans"), and (ii) M shall be satisfied, in its sole discretion, that N has sufficient funding to complete the Restoration Project as embodied in the Plans.

(c) Prior to the disbursement of any portion of the Restoration Grant from the Project Account for the purchase of any materials or the performance of any work for the Restoration Project, N shall have submitted to M, and M shall have approved in writing, the contractor, vendor, or other supplier, and the finally awarded contract for the labor or materials for which such disbursement is to be made.

(d) At the time the Restoration Grant is to be initially paid to N, and at the time of disbursement of any portion of the Restoration Grant from the Project Account, N shall not be in default in the performance of any of its obligations under the Agreement and shall be an organization described in sections 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(1), (2), or (3) of the Code.

Should any of the conditions not be satisfied, and should M be unwilling to waive the same, then M's obligation to make the Restoration Grant may be terminated.

M states that the set-aside was made as of November 1, 2001, and that the amounts set aside must and will actually be paid for the Restoration Project within a period of time that ends not more than 60 months after the date of the set-aside. The Agreement requires that payments of the Restoration Grant be made on or before [illegible], which is less than 60 months from the date of the set-aside.

M states that the Restoration Grant, as part of a matching-grant program, is intended to stimulate grants to N from the community at large. In addition, because of M's concern with the preservation and architectural features of P, M believes it is crucial that it retain a degree of control over the architectural plans and construction process. By making the disbursement of the funds dependent upon approval of drawings, plans, and specifications of the Restoration Project, M believes it can best meet the goal of preserving P.

Section 4942(a) of the Code imposes on the undistributed income of a private foundation for any taxable year, which has not been distributed before the first day of the second taxable

-3- 200224032

year following such taxable year, a tax equal to 15 percent of the amount of such income remaining undistributed at the beginning of such second taxable year.

Section 4942(c) of the Code provides that, for purposes of section 4942, the term “undistributed income” means, with respect to any private foundation for any taxable year as of any time, the amount by which (1) the distributable amount for each taxable year, exceeds (2) the qualifying distributions made before such time out of such distributable amount.

Section 4942(g)(1) of the Code defines the term "qualifying distribution,” in general, as any amount paid to accomplish one or more purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B), or to acquire an asset used directly in carrying out one or more purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B).

Section 4942(g)(2)(A) of the Code provides that an amount of income that is set aside for a specific project which comes within one or more purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B) of the Code may be treated as a qualifying distribution if the amount meets the set-aside requirements of section 4942(g)(2)(B).

Section 4942(g)(2)(B) of the Code provides, in pertinent part, that an amount set aside for a specific project may be treated as a qualifying distribution if, at the time of the set-aside, the private foundation establishes to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the amount set aside will be paid for the specific project within five years and that the suitability test for a set-aside under section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) is met.

Section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Code provides a suitability test under which the private foundation, at the time of the set-aside, must establish to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the specific project is one that can better be accomplished by the set-aside of income rather than by the immediate payment of funds.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(1) of the regulations provides that an amount set aside for a specific project that is for one or more of the purposes described in section 170(c)(1) or (2)(B) of the Code may be treated as a qualifying distribution in the year in which set aside (but not in the year in which actually paid), if the requirements of section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Code are met, the foundation establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the amount set aside will be paid for the specific project within 60 months after it has been set aside, and the set-aside otherwise meets the suitability test of section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the regulations.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the regulations provides that the suitability test is satisfied if the private foundation establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the specific project for which the amount is set aside is one that can be better accomplished by a set-aside than by the immediate payment of funds. Specific projects that can be better accomplished by the use of a set-aside include, but are not limited to, projects in which relatively long-term grants or expenditures must be made in order to assure the continuity of particular charitable projects or program-related investments (as defined in section 4944(c)) or where grants are made as part of a matching-grant program. Such projects include, for example, a plan to erect a building to house the direct charitable, educational, or other similar exempt activity of the private

-4- 200224032

foundation, even though the exact location and architectural plans have not been finalized.

Rev. Rul. 77-7, 1977-1 C.B. 354, holds that the term “specific project" includes a building project to be undertaken by a public charity unrelated to the foundation making the set aside.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(7)(i) of the regulations provides that if an amount is set aside under the suitability test of section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the regulations, the private foundation must apply for the Commissioner's approval of the set- aside before the end of the taxable year in which the amount is set aside.

M has timely sought approval of its set-aside of income in advance of the time when the amounts of income are to be set aside, as required by section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(7)(i) of the regulations. M's set-aside of $ x as a matching-grant will be for specific projects within the charitable purposes of section 170(c)(2)(B) of the Code, as required by section 4942(g)(2)(A) of the Code and section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the regulations. M represents that the amount set aside for the Restoration Project will be paid out within 60 months from the time it is set aside as required by section 4942(g)(2)(B) of the Code and section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(1) of the regulations. M's specific project, i.e., the Restoration Grant, is better accomplished by this set-aside of income, rather than by immediate payment, because it involves a grant made as part of a matching grant program as described in section 53.4942(a)- 3(b)(2) of the regulations. Thus, M's Restoration Grant to N meets the requirements for a set- aside of income under the suitability test of section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the regulations.

Accordingly, we rule that up to $ x of M's income to be set aside for the Restoration Grant to N will be treated as a qualifying distribution under section 4942(g) of the Code and section 53.4942(a)-3 of the regulations in the tax year when such amount is set aside.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(8) of the regulations provides that any set-aside approved by the Internal Revenue Service must be evidenced by the entry of a dollar amount in on the books and records of a private foundation as a pledge or obligation to be paid at a future date or dates. Further, any amount which is set aside must be taken into account in determining the private foundation's minimum investment return under section 53.4942(a)-2(c)(1) of the regulations, and any income attributable to a set-aside must be taken into account in computing adjusted net income under section 53.4942(a)-2(d) of the regulations.

Because this ruling letter could help to resolve any questions, please keep it in M's permanent records and include a copy with M's annual return, Form 990-PF.

This ruling letter is directed only to M. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

-5- 200224032

If you have any questions about this ruling, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

(signed) Terrell M. Berkovsky

Terrell M. Berkovsky
Manager, Exempt Organizations
Technical Group 2

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace